Advertisement

Passage, Flow, and the Logic of Temporal Perspectives

  • Jenann IsmaelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 326)

Abstract

In this paper, an attempt is made to inject a little formal precision into the discussion of passage. Instead of focusing on the quality of temporal experience, we talk about the content, and we argue that a good many of the issues can be resolved with an examination of the logic of temporal perspectives.

Keywords

Episodic Memory Perceptual State Representational Content Representational State Temporal Asymmetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albert, D.Z. 2000. Time and chance. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bruner, J. 1987. Life as narrative. Social Research 54: 11–32.Google Scholar
  3. Butterfield, J. 1999. The arguments of time. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chuard, P. 2011. Temporal experiences and their parts. Philosopher’s Imprint 11: 1–28.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A. 2013. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3): 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dainton, B. 2008. Sensing change. Philosophical Issues 18: 362–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennett, D. 1988. Why everyone is a novelist. Times Literary Supplement, September 16–22.Google Scholar
  8. Ellis, G. 2008. On the flow of time. arXiv:0812.0240.Google Scholar
  9. Gold, Th. (Ed.). (1967). The nature of time. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Grush, R. 2005. Internal models and the construction of time: Generalizing from state estimation to trajectory estimation to addresses temporal features of perception, including temporal illusions. Journal of Neural Engineering 2: 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2007. Time and experience. In Philosophie der Zeit, ed. Th. Müller, 27–44. Frankfurt: Klosterman.Google Scholar
  12. Hartle, J. 2005. The physics of now. American Journal of Physics 73 (2): 101–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ismael, J. 2007. The situated self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 2011a. Decision and the open future. In The future of the philosophy of time, ed. A. Bardon, 149–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2011b. Reflexivity, fixed points, and semantic descent; How I learned to stop worrying and love reflexivity. Acta Analytica 26 (4): 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2016. How physics makes us free. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James, W. 1890. The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joyce, J. 2002. Levi on causal decision theory and the possibility of predicting one’s own actions. Philosophical Studies 110: 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macintyre, A. 1981. After virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  20. Markosian, N. 2010. Time. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta. (Winter 2010 Edition). URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/time/
  21. Norton, J. 2010. Time really passes. Humana Mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 13: 23–34.Google Scholar
  22. Perry, J. 2001. Reference and reflexivity. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Phillips, I. 2014. The temporal structure of experience. In Subjective time: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality, ed. V. Arstila and D. Lloyd, 139–238. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Price, H. 1992. The direction of causation: Ramsey’s ultimate contingency. In PSA 92 (Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Vol. 1992), ed. D. Hull, M. Forbes, and K. Okruhlik, vol. 2, 253–267. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 1996. Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point: New directions for the physics of time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Proust, M. 2002. In search of lost time. London: Allen Lane. (6 vols).Google Scholar
  27. Ramsey, F.P. 1978. General propositions and causality. In Foundations: Essays in philosophy, logic, mathematics and economics, ed. D.H. Mellor, 133–151. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  28. Strawson, G. 2004. Against narrativity. Ratio (new series) XVII, December 4.Google Scholar
  29. Sutton, J. 1998. Philosophy and memory traces: Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations