Advertisement

A Check-Dam to Measure Debris Flow-Structure Interactions in the Gadria Torrent Open image in new window

  • Georg NaglEmail author
  • Johannes Hübl
Conference paper

Abstract

To design technical mitigation structure against debris flows in torrents it is important to define realistic design impact loads. Presented impact forces were mostly derived from back calculations of past events and yielded a rough estimation. The majority of scientific publications of impact force are based on small scale experiments in laboratories, but the transfer to real scale problems is limited due to scaling issues. Monitoring in real scale of debris flows is necessary to understand the process and the apparent phenomena. The Gadria valley in the Autonomous Province of Bozen-Bolzano is one of the rare areas were debris flows frequently occur. Therefore the Gadria torrent is already equipped with a monitoring station to provide data to analyze the occurring debris flows. To measure real scale impact forces of a debris flow and the variables that are necessary to calculate and understand the impact process and the debris flow/structure/ground interaction, a special monitoring check dam is designed and will be built in September 2016. An arrangement of 38 sensors will measure the impact forces on the check dam, the acceleration of the construction and the interaction with the ground. Also the pore water pressures, weights and heights of the debris flows will be recorded. This arrangement of sensors should help to understand the debris flow structure interaction to facilitate the calibration of numerical models and to improve guidelines for national standards.

Keywords

Debris flows Monitoring Impact force 

References

  1. Arattano M, Coviello V, Cavalli M, Comiti F, Macconi P, Theule J, Crema S (2015) Brief communication: a new testing field for debris flow warning systems. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 15(7):1545–1549. doi: 10.5194/nhess-15-1545-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berti M, Genevois R, LaHusen R, Simoni A, Tecca PR (2000) Debris flow monitoring in the Acquabona watershed on the Dolomites (Italian Alps). Phys Chem Earth, Part B: Hydrol, Oceans and Atmos 25(9):707–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Comiti F, Marchi L, Macconi P, Arattano M, Bertoldi G, Borga M. et al. (2014) A new monitoring station for debris flows in the European Alps: first observations in the Gadria basin. Nat Hazards 73(3):1175–1198. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1088-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hu Kaiheng, Wei Fangqiang, Li Yong (2011) Real-time measurement and preliminary analysis of debris-flow impact force at Jiangjia Ravine, China. Earth Surf Process Landforms 36(9):1268–1278. doi: 10.1002/esp.2155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hübl J, Schimmel A, Kogelnig A, Suriñach E, Vilajosana I, Mcardell BW (2013) A review on acoustic moni toring of debris flow. Int J SAFE 3(1):105–115. doi: 10.2495/SAFE-V3-N2-105-115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hungr O, Morgan GC, Kellerhals R (1984) Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Can Geotech J.21(4):663–677. doi: 10.1139/t84-073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaitna R, Palucis MC, Yohannes B, Hill KM, Dietrich WE (2016) Effects of coarse grain size distribution and fine particle content on pore fluid pressure and shear behavior in experimental debris flows. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 121(2):415–441. doi: 10.1002/2015JF003725 Google Scholar
  8. Marchi L, Arattano M, Deganutti AM (2002) Ten years of debris-flow monitoring in the Moscardo Torrent (Italian Alps). Geomorphology 46(1–2):1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00162-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Scheidl C, Chiari M, Kaitna R, Müllegger M, Krawtschuk A, Zimmermann T, Proske D (2013) Analysing debris-flow impact models, based on a small scale modelling approach. Surv Geophys 34(1):121–140. doi: 10.1007/s10712-012-9199-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Suwa H, Okano K, Kanno T (2011) Forty years of debris flow monitoring at kamikamihorizawa creek, mount yakedake, Japan. Ital J Eng Geol Environ. Checked on 24 June 2016Google Scholar
  11. Suwa H, Okuda S, Yokoyama K (1973) Observation system on rocky mudflow. Bulletin Disaster Prevention Institute, Kyoto University, vol 23. Parts 3–4 No. 213Google Scholar
  12. Wendeler C, Volkwein A, Roth A, Denk M, Wartmann S (2007) Field measurements and numerical modelling of flexible debris flow barriers. Debris-Flow Hazards Mitig Mech Predict Assess. Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 681–687Google Scholar
  13. Zhang S (1993) A comprehensive approach to the observation and prevention of debris flows in China. Nat Hazards 7(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang S, Yuan J (1984) Impact forces of debris flow and its detection. In Memoirs of Lanzhou Institut of Glaziology and Cryopedology Chinese Academy of Science 1984 (04). Checked on 18 Aug 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Institute of Mountain Risk EngineeringViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations