Epilogue as Conclusion

  • Thomas Nemeth
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Studies in German Idealism book series (SIGI, volume 19)

Abstract

The conclusion summarizes how the Russian diaspora in its early years viewed Kant in order to show how Russian philosophy differed from Western philosophy. The dominent ontological orientation of Russian philosophy remained. Thus, in light of the emerging interest in ontology in the West, it is doubtful that the nascent epistemological concerns of the neo-Kantians would have gained ascendency had Russian philosophy not been disrupted by political events.

Keywords

Gordon Vejdeman Sesemann Fokht Hartmann 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography of Works Cited

  1. Abramov, A.I. 1998. Kantianstvo v russkoj universitetskoj filosofii. Voprosy filosofii i psikhologii 1: 58–68.Google Scholar
  2. Beiser, Frederick. 2013. Weimar Philosophy and the Fate of Neo-Kantianism. In Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy, ed. Peter E. Gordon and John P. McCormick, 115–132. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. 2006. Vasily Sesemann: Experience, Formalism, and the Question of Being. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  4. Dmitrieva, N[ina] A. 2006. Iz istorii neokantianstva v Rossii. In Eternity’s Hostage: Selected Papers from the Stanford International Conference on Boris Pasternak, ed. L. Fleishman, 467–494. Stanford: Stanford Slavic Studies.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2007. Russkoe neokantianstvo: “Marburg” v Rossii. Istoriko-filosofskie ocherki. Moscow: Rosspen.Google Scholar
  6. Finkel, Stuart. 2007. On the Ideological Front: the Russian Intelligentsia and the Making of the Soviet Public Sphere. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jakovenko, B.V. 2003. Istorija russkoj filosofii. Moscow: Respublika.Google Scholar
  8. Koval’chuk, Svetlana. 1998. “Vzyskuja Istinu…” (Iz istorii russkoj religioznoj, filosofskoj i obshchestvenno-politicheskoj mysli v Latvii). Riga: Institut filosofii i sociologii Latvijskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
  9. Pavlov, A[leksej]. T. 2010. Filosofija v Moskovskom Universitete. St. Petersburg: Izd. Russkoj khristianskoj gumanitarnoj akademii.Google Scholar
  10. Vejdeman, Aleksandr. 1927. Myshlenie i bytie (Logika dostatochnogo osnovanija). Riga: Salamandra.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1938. Opravdanie zla. Riga: Izd. “Logos”.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Nemeth
    • 1
  1. 1.Jordan Center for the Advanced Study of RussiaNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations