Distributed Computing of Management Data in a Telecommunications Network

  • Ville Kojola
  • Shubham Kapoor
  • Kimmo Hätönen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 191)


In this paper, we propose a concept for distributed Management Plane data computation and its delivery in the cellular networks. Architecture for proposed concept is described. Calculation of Key Performance Indicators is distributed to the cellular network edge, close to the managed network elements which reduces the volume of the Management Plane traffic. In this concept, further aggregation and refinement of data is done in the nodes located in the operator’s cloud, close to consumers of Management Plane data. Distribution of calculation to the network edge reduces load at the network operator’s central database. This paper presents an analysis to the benefits of the proposed concept. Efficient on-demand type streaming data delivery model allows network management functions to be plugged in to receive Management Plane data directly without database access. A demonstrator system has been implemented. The feasibility of the implementation is evaluated in terms of resource consumption and latency.


Cellular network Key performance indicator Network management 


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    3GPP. Telecommunication management; Key Performance Indicators (KPI) for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN): Definitions. TS 32.450, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), August 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    3GPP. Telecommunication management; Self-Organizing Networks (SON) Policy Network Resource Model (NRM) Integration Reference Point (IRP); Requirements (3Gpp. TS 32.521 version 9.0.0 Release 9). TS 32.521, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), April 2010Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Baldi, M., Picco., G.P.: Evaluating the tradeoffs of mobile code design paradigms in network management applications. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 146–155. IEEE (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., Davin, J.: RFC 1157: Simple network management protocol (SNMP) (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clemm, A., Wolter, R.: Network-Embedded Management and Applications: Understanding Programmable Networking Infrastructure. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eugster, P.T., Felber, P.A., Guerraoui, R., Kermarrec, A.M.: The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 35(2), 114–131 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goodhope, K., Koshy, J., Kreps, J., Narkhede, N., Park, R., Rao, J., Ye, V.Y.: Building linkedin’s real-time activity data pipeline. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 35(2), 33–45 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hertel, G.: Operation and maintenance. In: Hillebrand, F. (ed.) GSM and UMTS The Creation of Global Mobile Communication, pp. 445–456. Wiley, Chichester (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hämäläinen, S., Sanneck, H.: LTE Self-Organising Networks (SON): Network Management Automation for Operational Efficiency. Wiley, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nossenson, R.: Long-term evolution network architecture. In: IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electronics Systems, COMCAS, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olsson, M., Mulligan, C.: EPC and 4G Packet Networks: Driving the Mobile Broadband Revolution. Academic Press, Amsterdam (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simões, P., Rodrigues, J., Silva, L., Boavida, F.: Distributed retrieval of management information: is it about mobility, locality or distribution? In: Network Operations and Management Symposium, NOMS. IEEE/IFIP, pp. 79–94. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    TeleManagement Forum. Telecom operations map. Approved version 2.1. GB910. TeleManagement Forum, March 2000Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trossen, D., Reed, M.J., Riihijärvi, J., Georgiades, M., Fotiou, N., Xylomenos, G.: IP over ICN-the better IP? In: European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), pp. 413–417. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Ubiquitous ComputingUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Nokia Bell LabsEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations