Advertisement

Robotic Pyeloplasty in Infants and Toddlers

  • Arvind P. Ganpule
Chapter

Abstract

Pyeloplasty has been considered to be the gold standard for management of pelviureteric junction obstruction. It can be performed in a number of ways. The well described approaches to pyeloplasty include, laparoscopy, robotic and the gold standard open approach. The obvious advantages of robotic approach include better vision dexterity and ability to suture with three dimensional vision. The advantages of robotic pyeloplasty are more obvious in paediatric age group. The suturing in pediatric patients presents with a unique set of challenges. In this chapter, we emphasise the difficulties associated with robotic pyeloplasty.

References

  1. 1.
    Ganpule A, Bhattu A, Mishra S, Desai MR. Ultrasound-guided antegrade access during laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants less than one year of age: a point of technique. J Minim Access Surg. 2012;8:107–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bird VG, Levellie RJ, Eldefrqu A, et al. Comparison of robot assisted versus conventional laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 2011;77:730–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weise ES, Winfield H. Robotic computer assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2006;20:813–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganpule AP, Jairath A, Singh A. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children less than 20 kg by weight: single-center experience. World J Urol. 2015;33:1867–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of UrologyMuljibhai Patel Urological HospitalNadiadIndia

Personalised recommendations