Advertisement

Difficulties in Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

  • Manoj B. Patel
  • Sanket Chauhan
  • Kenneth J. Palmer
  • Vipul R. Patel
Chapter

Abstract

The task of learning robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) can be quite challenging for both novice and experienced open or laparoscopic surgeons alike. Therefore, prior to the first procedure, adequate training and planning is required as the entire surgical team prepares for the upcoming challenge. The learning curve to achieve basic competency has been estimated to be between 20 and 25 cases. However, during the initial stage of the learning curve, the surgeon should screen potential operative candidates cautiously to minimize the technical challenges of the procedure by selecting “ideal candidates” so that the surgical team can ease into the experience. As the experience of the surgeon and robotic team develops, one can begin to entertain the idea of tackling more challenging clinical scenarios, as studies have shown that difficult cases were attempted after performing a median of 50 procedures.

References

  1. 1.
    Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168(3):945-949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perer E, Lee D, Ahlering T, Clayman R. Robotic revelation: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a nonlaparoscopic surgeon. J Am Coll Surg. 2003;10:1738-1741.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lavery H, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Patel VR. The advanced learning curve in robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional survey. J Endourol. 2007;21(Suppl 1):8-61.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Venkatesh V, Landman J, Sundaram CP, et al. Prevention, recognition, and management of laparoscopic complications in urologic surgery. AUA Update Ser. 2003;12(40):322-331.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Litwiller JP, Wells RE Jr, Halliwill JR, et al. Effect of lithotomy positions on strain of the obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. Clin Anat. 2004;17:45-49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tewari A, Rao SR. Anatomical foundations and surgical manoeuvres for precise identification of the prostatovesical junction during robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2006;98:833-837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mulhall JP, Slovick R, Hotaling J, et al. Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: hemodynamic profiles and their correlation with the recovery of erectile function. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1371-1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers CG, Trock BP, Walsh PC. Preservation of accessory pudendal arteries during radical retropubic prostatectomy: surgical technique and results. Urology. 2004;64(1):148-151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matin SF. Recognition and preservation of accessory pudendal arteries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2006;67(5):1012-1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Secin FP, Touijer K, Mulhall J, Guillonneau B. Anatomy and preservation of accessory pudendal arteries in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(5):1229-1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA, Lee DI, Skarecky DW. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology. 2004;64(6):1224-1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nguyen MM, Turna B, Santos BR, et al. The use of an endoscopic stapler vs suture ligature for dorsal vein control in laparoscopic prostatectomy: operative outcomes. BJU Int. 2008;101(4):463-466.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Campenni MA, Harmon JD, Ginsberg PC, Harkaway RC. Improved continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy using two pubo-urethral suspension stitches. Urol Int. 2002;68(2):109-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shalhav AL, Orvieto MA, Chien GW, Mikhail AA, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC. Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology. Urology. 2006;68(3):508-513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson KR, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic lower urinary tract reconstruction. World J Urol. 2000;18:349-354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manoj B. Patel
    • 1
  • Sanket Chauhan
    • 1
  • Kenneth J. Palmer
    • 1
  • Vipul R. Patel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Urologic SurgeryGlobal Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital-Celebration HealthCelebrationUSA

Personalised recommendations