Social Policy: Targeting Women in Urban Policies – Producing Subject Positions

  • Marguerite van den Berg
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

This chapter considers the next generation of urbanites as one entry point for entrepreneurial urban strategies. It investigates the way in which cities aiming to redefine themselves imagine future populations and how in these efforts they design social policies that explicitly and particularly target women as mothers. It develops the concept of urban regeneration: efforts to regenerate the city by either investing in the children (the next generation) of the current population or replacing the current population of children by a new generation of better-suited children. Based on an ethnographic case study of parenting guidance policy practices, this chapter shows how a ritual-like practice of communication and reflection produces subject positions in parenting guidance that very much resemble what is expected of employees in the post-Fordist and arguably more feminine labour market.

Keywords

Feminization Parenting Mothers Emancipation Empowerment Urban regeneration 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abramovich, M. ([1988] 1996). Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from ColonialTimes to the Present. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adkins, L. (2002). Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late Modernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam. London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition, and Aestheticsin in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, C. (1997). Ritual. Perspectives and Dimensions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, van den, M. (2013). City Children and Genderfied Neighbourhoods: The New Generation as Urban Regeneration Strategy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 523–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg, van den, M. (2016a). Egalitarian Paternalism. Interactional Forms of Negotiating Equality and Intervention in Dutch Policy Practices. Citizenship Studies, 20(3/4), 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berg, van den, M. (2016b). ‘Activating’ those that ‘Lag Behind’ – Space-Time Politics in Dutch Parenting Training for Migrants. Patterns of Prejudice, 50(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berg, van den, M., & Arts, J. (forthcoming). Evaluating the Aesthetics of Work-Readiness. Aesthetic Judgements for Conditional Welfare and Post-Fordist Labour Markets.Google Scholar
  10. Berg, van den, M., & Chevalier, D. (forthcoming). Of “City Lounges”, “Bans on Gathering” and Macho policies. Gender, Class and Race in Productions of Space for Rotterdam’s Post-Industrial Future.Google Scholar
  11. Berg, van den, M., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2012). Paternalizing Mothers. Feminist Repertoires in Contemporary Dutch Civilizing Offensives. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 554–574.Google Scholar
  12. Berg, van den, M., & Schinkel, W. (2009). “Women from the Catacombs of the City”: Gender Notions in Dutch Culturist Discourse. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 22(4), 393–410.Google Scholar
  13. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Bonjour, S., & De Hart, B. (2013). A Proper Wife, a Proper Marriage. Constructions of ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Dutch Family Migration Policy. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(1), 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boucher, M. (2011). Gouverner les familles: Les classes populaires à l’épreuve de la parentalité [Governing families. Working classes experiencing parenthood]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. ([1984] 1996). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Crozier, G. (1998). Parents and Schools: Partnership of Surveillance? Journal of Education Policy, 13(1), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crozier, G., & Davies, J. (2007). Hard To Reach Parents or Hard To Reach Schools? A Discussion of Home-School Relations, With Particular Reference to Bangladeshi and Pakistani Parents. Britisheducational Research Journal, 33(3), 295–313.Google Scholar
  19. Cruikshank, B. (1999). The Will to Empower. Democratic Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Donzelot, J. ([1977] 1980). The Policing of Families: Welfare Versus the State. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
  21. Duyvendak, J. W. (2004). Een eensgezinde, vooruitstrevende natie. Over de mythe van dé individualisering en de toekomst van de sociologie. Amsterdam: Vossius pers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duyvendak, J. W. (2011). The Politics of Home. Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Elchardus, M. (2009). Self-Control as Social Control. The Emergence of Symbolic Society Poetics, 37(2), 146–161.Google Scholar
  24. Epstein, J. L. (2001). School, Family and Community Partnerships. Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ghorashi, H. (2003). Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Daring or Dogmatic? Debates on Multiculturalism and Emancipation in the Netherlands. In: T. Van Meijl & H. Driessen (Eds.). Multiple identifications and the self. Utrecht: Stichting Focaal.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity – Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  29. Grandey, A., Deifendorff, J., & Rupp, D. (Eds.) (2012). Emotional Labor in the Twenty-First Century: Diverse Perspectives on Emotion Regulation at Work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hage, J., & Powers, C. H. (1992). Post-Industrial Lives. Roles and Relationships in the 21st Century. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harvey, D. (1989). From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, 71B(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Hochschild, A. R. ([1983] 2012). The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hoffman, L. (2014). The Urban, Politics and Subject Formation. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1576–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kabeer, N. (1995). Targeting Women or Transforming Institutions? Policy Lessons from NGO Anti Poverty Efforts. Development in Practice, 5(2), 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalberg, S. (2002). Introduction to the Protestant Ethic. In: M. Weber ([1920] 2002) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (pp. xi–lxxvii). Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Keere, de, K. (2014). From a Self-Made to an Already-Made Man A Historical Content Analysis of Professional Advice Literature. Acta Sociologica, 57(4), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lopez, G. R., Scribner, J. D., & Mahitivanichcha, K. (2001). Redefining Parent Involvement: Lessons From High-Performing Migrant-Impacted Schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 253–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahmood, S. (2001). Rehearsed Spontaneity and the Conventionality of Ritual: Disciplines of Şalat. American Ethnologist, 28(4), 827–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McDowell, L. (2000). “Learning to Serve?” Employment Aspirations and Attitudes of Working-Class Men in an Era of Labour Market Restructuring. Gender, Place and Culture, 7(4), 389–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDowell, L. (2003). Redundant Masculinities? Employment Change and White Working ClassYouth. Blackwell: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McDowell, L. (2009). Working Bodies. Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Muehlebach, A. (2011). On Affective Labour in Post-Fordist Italy. Cultural Anthropology, 26(1), 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Muehlebach, A. (2012). The Moral Neoliberal. Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nayak, A. (2006). Displaced Masculinities. Chavs, Youth, and Class in the Post-Industrial City. Sociology, 40(5), 813–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nixon, D. (2009). “I Can’t Put a Smiley Face On”: Working-Class Masculinity, Emotional Labour and Service Work in the ‘New Economy’. Gender, Work and Organization, 16(3), 300–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. NIZW, Nederlands Instituut voor Zorg en Welzijn. (2006). Opvoeden Zo! Cursusmap. Utrecht: NIZW.Google Scholar
  48. Peake, L. (2016). On Feminism and Feminist Allies in knowledge Production in Urban Geography. Urban Geography, 37(6), 830–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peake, L., & Rieker, M. (eds.) (2015). Rethinking Feminist Interventions Into the Urban. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Prins, B. (2000). Voorbij de onschuld. Het debat over integratie in Nederland. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  51. Rahman, A. (1999). Micro-Credit Initiatives for Equitable and Sustainable Development: Who Pays? World Development, 27(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reekum, R., Van, & Berg, van den, M. (2015). Performing Dialogical Dutchness: Negotiating a National Imaginary in Parenting Guidance. Nations and Nationalism, 21(4), 741–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sassen, S. (1991). The Global City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schinkel, W. (2007). Denken in een tijd van sociale hypochondrie. Aanzet tot een theorie voorbij de maatschappij. Kampen: Klement.Google Scholar
  55. Sharma, A. (2008). Logics of Empowerment: Development, Gender, and Governance in Neoliberal India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  56. Starfield, S. (2002). “I’m a Second-Language English Speaker”: Negotiating Writer Identity And Authority in Sociology One. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 1(2), 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Verkaaik, O. (2009). Ritueel burgerschap. Een essay over nationalisme en secularisme in Nederland. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
  58. Verkaaik, O. (2010). The Cachet Dilemma: Ritual and Agency in New Dutch Nationalism. AmericanEthnologist, 37(1), 69–82.Google Scholar
  59. Vincent, C. (2001). Social Class and Parental Agency. Journal of Education Policy, 16(4), 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Waal, van der, J., & Burgers, J. (2009). Unravelling the Global City Debate on Social Inequality: A Firm Level Analysis of Wage Inequality in Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 46(13), 2715–2729.Google Scholar
  61. Weber, M. ([1920] 2002). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  62. Wekker, G. (2004). Still Crazy after All Those Years … Feminism for the New Millennium. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 11(4), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wekker, G. (2016). White Innocence: Paradoxes of Colonialism and Race. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Willis, P. E. (1977). Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Willis, P. E., & Trondman, M. (2000). Manifesto for Ethnography. Ethnography, 1(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and Nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marguerite van den Berg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations