Perspectives of Saint John Chrysostom for the VUCA World

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

We are used to think that the VUCA world is a recent phenomenon, its characteristics being specific to our post-modern era. However, these four traits, volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity, characterize many other periods of the human history. This chapter proposes an inquiry on the spiritual teaching received by the managers of Antiquity, specifically the Pater Familias , in order to cope with the challenges of the VUCA world of Antioch and Constantinople in the fourth century in Late Roman Empire. Following the tradition of Fathers of the Desert and Fathers of the Church, their teacher, John Chrysostom , proposes an Integrative Mindfulness Program. This program goes beyond the classical approach of mindfulness by proposing a state of mind called hesychia . This is a peaceful state of mind which is the fruit of nepsis , the attention to one thoughts and of spiritual discernment . The classical approach of mindfulness it has been inspired by Buddhism and it has transformed into a secularized method of self-development based on awareness, attention and non-judgement attitude—these three components describe the classical approach of mindfulness. In this sense, the Integrative Mindfulness Program of John Chrysostom is more fundamental and proposes a profound and stable inner change and not only a temporary state of mind.

Thanks to a hermeneutic approach we deliver the main structure, the objectives and the implementation of the Integrative Mindfulness Program .

Keywords

Human Nature Ethical Decision Moral Intensity Fourth Century Spiritual Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 125–143.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bph077.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, P. (2012). Through the eye of a needle: Wealth, the Fall of Rome, and the making of Christianity in the West, 350-550 AD. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiesa, A., & Serretti, A. (2009). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for stress management in healthy people: A review and meta-analysis. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 15(5), 593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson, R. J., Kabat-Zinn, J., Schumacher, J., Rosenkranz, M., Muller, D., Santorelli, S. F., & Urbanowski, F. (2003). Alterations in brain and immune function produced by mindfulness meditation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4), 564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S., & Walach, H. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits. A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57(1), 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayibor, S., & Wasieleski, D. M. (2009). Effects of the use of the availability heuristic on ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: A meta-analytic review. NIH Public Access, 78(2), 169–183.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395.Google Scholar
  12. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.Google Scholar
  13. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2009). Mindfulness, 1–4. Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis, 15(5), 593–600.Google Scholar
  14. Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lawlor, M. S. (2010). The effects of a mindfulness-based education program on pre- and early adolescents’ well-being and social and emotional competence. Mindfulness, 1(3), 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teasdale, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., Ridgeway, V. A., Soulsby, J. M., & Lau, M. A. (2000). Prevention of relapse/recurrence in major depression by mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Princeton University Faith & Work InitiativePrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Center for the Study of ReligionPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations