Place, Space and Hermeneutics pp 413-425

Part of the Contributions to Hermeneutics book series (CONT HERMEN, volume 5) | Cite as

Place, Life-World and the Leib: A Reconstructive Perspective on Spatial Experiences for Human Geography

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter tries to scope the influence of phenomenology and hermeneutics for place-based methodologies and concepts in Geography. As this metatheoretical concept is seen as paradigmatic to cope with the understanding of places and (social) spaces, it is astonishing that its significance seems to be still underdeveloped or overlooked. The importance and productivity of hermeneutics and phenomenology to contribute to place-related phenomena like globality or transnationality is evident, but not the most popular strand in contemporary Human Geography. As well, it is challenged by ‘post’- and by ‘anti’-hermeneutic approaches like post-phenomenology or deconstruction, which misconceive its potential to raise their argument against the ‘limitations’ of classic phenomenology; it is argued that this perspective is based on a self-contradicting conceptionalizing of the social, which cannot tap the potential of hermeneutics to reconstruct life-world experiences like places, architectures, other beings, or atmospheres. Here we trace the arrival as well as the significance and the prospects of hermeneutic approaches in Geography in the light of such discussions.

References

  1. Anderson, Ben, and Paul Harrison. 2010. Taking-Place: Non-Representational Theories and Geography. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  2. Ash, James, and Paul Simpson. 2014. Geography and Post-Phenomenology. In Progress in Human Geography, 1–19.Google Scholar
  3. Bachelard, Gaston. 1969. The Poetics of Space . Trans. Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press. Google Scholar
  4. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  5. Blumer, Herbert. 1973. A Note on Symbolic Interactionism. American Sociological Review 38(6): 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bohnsack, Ralf. 2000. Reconstructive Social Research. Introduction to Methodology and Practice of Qualitative Research. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
  7. Bollnow, Otto Friedrich. 1961. Lived-Space. Philosophy Today 5(1): 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2011/1963. Human space. London: Hyphen Press. (translated from Mensch und Raum, Kohlhammer: Stuttgart).Google Scholar
  9. Buttimer, Anne. 1976. Grasping the Dynamism of Life-World. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 66(2): 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buttimer, Anne, and David Seamon. 1980. The Human Experience of Space and Place. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cosgrove, Denis. 1984. Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cresswell, Tim. 1996. In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. De Lyser, Dydia, et al. 2014. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Denzin, Norman, and Yvonna Lincoln. 2005. Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, 1–33. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Derrida, Jacques, and Hans-Georg Gadamer. 2004. Der ununterbrochene Dialog. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Dewsbury, John-David. 2003. Witnessing Space: ‘Knowledge Without Contemplation’. Environment and Planning A 35: 1907–1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Doerfler, Thomas, and Eberhard Rothfuß. 2013. Postkonstruktivismus – Jenseits von Postmoderne und Cultural Turn. Berichte. Geographie und Landeskunde 87(2): 195–203.Google Scholar
  18. Duncan, James. 1990. The City as a Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society, Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hasse, Juergen. 2014. Was Raeume mit uns machen – und wir mit ihnen. Kritische Phänomenologie des Raumes. Freiburg/München: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  21. Ihde, Don. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience. Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2012. Postphenomenological Re-embodiment. Foundations in Science 17(4): 373377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Korf, Benedikt. 2012. Neuro-Kulturgeographie. Geographica Helvetica 67(1–2): 77–84.Google Scholar
  24. Lea, Jennifer Jane. 2009. Post-Phenomenology/Post-Phenomenological Geographies. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, ed. Rob Kitchin and Nigel Thrift, 373–378. Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorimer, Hayden. 2005. Cultural Geography: The Busyness of Being ‘More-than-representational’. Progress in Human Geography 29(1): 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Löw, Martina. 2008. The Constitution of Space. The Structuration of Spaces Through the Simultaneity of Effect and Perception. European Journal of Social Theory 11(1): 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malpas, Jeff. 1999. Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Massey, Doreen. 1991. A Global Sense of Place. Marxism Today 38: 24–29.Google Scholar
  29. McCormack, Derek. 2003. Geographies for Moving Bodies: Thinking, Dancing, Spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. The Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  31. Michelfelder, Diane, and Richard Palmer. 1989. Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mitchell, Don. 2000. Cultural Geography. A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Piaget, Jean. 1954. The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Piaget, Jean, and Baerbel Inhelder. 1967. The Child’s Conception of Space. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Pickles, John. 1985. Phenomenology, Science and Geography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plessner, Helmuth. 1970. Laughing and Crying: A Study of the Limits of Human Behaviour. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Relph, Edward. 1976. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.Google Scholar
  38. Schroer, Markus. 2006. Räume, Orte, Grenzen. Auf dem Weg zu einer Soziologie des Raums. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  39. Schütz, Alfred. 1945. On Multiple Realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5(4): 533–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 1967 [1932]. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: North Western University Press.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 1982. Life Forms and Meaning Structure. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Seamon, David/Sowers, Jacob. 2008. Place and Placelessness (1976): Edward Relph. In Key Texts in Human Geography, ed. Phil Hubbard, Rob Kitchin & Gill Valentine. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Simonsen, Kirsten. 2004. Spatiality, Temporality and the Construction of the City. In Space Odysseys: Spatiality and Social Relations in the 21. Century, ed. Jorgen Ole Baerenholdt and Kirsten Simonsen. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2013. In Quest of a New Humanism: Embodiment, Experience and Phenomenology as Critical Geography. Progress in Human Geography 37(1): 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Srubar, Ilja. 1981. Einleitung. Schütz’ Bergson Rezeption. In Theorie der Lebensformen, ed. Ilja Srubar. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. Thrift, Nigel. 1996. Spatial Formations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 2000. Non-Representational Theory. In The Dictionary of Human Geography, ed. Ron Johnston, Derek Gregory, Geraldine Pratt, Michael Watts, and Sarah Whatmore. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2007. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  50. Werlen, Benno. 2010. Geographie. In Raumwissenschaftliche Basics. Eine Einführung für die Soziale Arbeit, ed. Christian Reutlinger et al., 70–80. Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
  51. Winchester, Hilary P.M., and Matthew W. Rofe. 2010. Qualitative Research and Its Place in Human Geography. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. Ian Hay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Žižek, Slavoj. 1998. Cyberspace, or, How to Traverse the Fantasy in the Age of the Retreat of the Big Other. Public Culture 10(3): 483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeographyUniversity of BayreuthBayreuthGermany

Personalised recommendations