Advertisement

Technology for the Active Senior

  • Micael Santos CouceiroEmail author
  • Gonçalo Nuno Figueiredo Dias
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research book series (BRIEFSWELLBEING)

Abstract

The ever-increasing ageing of the population has been under the international spotlight for the past few years. The solutions provided so far essentially focus on the health care, personal care services and pensions. However, even by reducing the growth of healthcare costs, the demographic trends and constrained state will drive health and retirement spending toward an even larger share of the economy. Therefore, one needs to go beyond the classical approaches and develop new breakthroughs for active and assisted living (AAL) by benefiting from the Information and Communications Technology (ICT). Those breakthroughs should focus on fighting the cognitive impairment, frailty and social exclusion of the ageing population, so as to improve the quality of their life and the ones surrounding them. The recent technological developments combined with other disciplines, such as behavioural, sociological, health and others, have opened a new window of opportunity. Nevertheless, and given the multidisciplinary research involved, the market has not yet provided reliable commercial solutions to appropriately address this specific challenge. This chapter outlines the general ideas and future prospects, supported by the recent rapid proliferation of ICT solutions, mainly focusing in two key approaches: (i) mixed reality serious games; and (ii) robotics. The main purpose is to foster the development of projects based on the premise that those will be ultimately beneficial, not only for the science and technological competitiveness, but also to our socio-economic welfare, increasing the sustainability and efficiency of both social and healthcare systems and, more importantly, the quality of life of the elderly.

Keywords

Information and communication technology Active and assisted living Wearable technologies Augmented reality Robotics 

References

  1. Ageing Working Group. (2012). The 2012 Ageing Report-Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010–2060). Brussels: EU Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Arrichiello, F., Chiaverini, S., & Fossen, T. I. (2006). Formation control of marine surface vessels using the Null-Space-based Behavioral control. In Group Coordination and Cooperative Control (pp. 1–19). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Barbesh, G. I., & Glied, S. A. (2010). New technology and health care costs—The case of robot-assisted surgery. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(8), 701–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borrmann, D., Elseberg, J., Lingemann, K., Nüchter, A., & Hertzberg, J. (2008). Globally consistent 3D mapping with scan matching. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 56(2), 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botella, C., Bretón-López, J., Quero, S., Baños, R., & García-Palacios, A. (2010). Treating cockroach phobia with augmented reality. Behavior Therapy, 41(3), 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 39(6669), 756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calderita, L. V., Bustos, P., Mejías, C. S., González, B. F., & Bandera, A. (2013). Rehabilitation for children while playing with a robotic assistant in a serious game. In Neurotechnix 2013 Proceedings, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal. Google Scholar
  8. Callejas-Cuervo, M., Díaz, G. M., & Ruíz-Olaya, A. F. (2015). Integration of emerging motion capture technologies and videogames for human upper-limb telerehabilitation: A systematic review. Dyna, 82(189), 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, D. A., Ozick, D., Vu, C., Lynch, J., & Mass, P. R. (2008). Autonomous robot auto-docking and energy management systems and methods. Patent-7332890.Google Scholar
  10. Couceiro, M. S., Martins, F. M., Rocha, R. P., Ferreira, N. M., & Sivasundaram, S. (2012). Introducing the fractional order robotic Darwinian PSO. In AIP Conference Proceedings-American Institute of Physics (Vol. 1493, No. 1, p. 242).Google Scholar
  11. Cupec, R., Lorch, O., & Schmidt, G. (2003). Vision-guided humanoid walking—Concepts and experiments. Autonome Mobile Systeme 2003 (pp. 1–11). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Carvalho, R., & Ishitani, L. (2012). Motivational factors for mobile serious games for elderly users. Paper presented at the Proceedings of XI SB Games 2012, Brasilia, Brazil.Google Scholar
  13. Dias, G., & Mendes, R. (2013). Atividade Física para a Terceira idade. Coimbra.Google Scholar
  14. Djaouti, D., Alvarez, J., Jessel, J. P., & Rampnoux, O. (2011). Origins of serious games. Serious games and edutainment applications (pp. 25–43). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferreira, N. L., Couceiro, M. S., Araújo, A., & Rocha, R. P. (2013). Multi-sensor fusion and classification with mobile robots for situation awareness in urban search and rescue using ROS. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
  16. Gutmann, J. S., Fukuchi, M., & Fujita, M. (2004). Stair climbing for humanoid robots using stereo vision. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2004. (IROS 2004). Proceedings. 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 1407–1413). IEEE.Google Scholar
  17. Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., & Evers, V. (2008). Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction (pp. 113–120). ACM.Google Scholar
  18. Hough, M. G. (2011). Exploring elder consumers’ interactions with information technology. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 2(6), 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Humpel, N., Owen, N., & Leslie, E. (2002). Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 22(3), 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaess, M., Ranganathan, A., & Dellaert, F. (2008). iSAM: Incremental smoothing and mapping. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 24(6), 1365–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamei, K., Nishio, S., Hagita, N., & Sato, M. (2012). Cloud networked robotics. IEEE Network, 26(3), 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kilteni, K., Normand, J. M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2012). Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: A very long arm illusion. PloS one, 7(7), e40867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laut, J., Cappa, F., Nov, O., & Porfiri, M. (2015). Increasing patient engagement in rehabilitation exercises using computer-based citizen science. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0117013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lehrer, N., Chen, Y., Duff, M., Wolf, S. L., & Rikakis, T. (2011). Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, Part II: Design of interactive feedback for upper limb rehabilitation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 8(1), 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lemus-Zúñiga, L. G., Navarro-Pardo, E., MoretTatay, C., & Pocinho, R. (2015). Serious games for elderly continuous monitoring. In Data Mining in Clinical Medicine (pp. 259–267). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Li, C., Rusák, Z., Horváth, I., Hou, Y., & Ji, L. (2014). Optimizing patients’ engagement by a cyber-physical rehabilitation system. In GI-Jahrestagung (pp. 1971–1976).Google Scholar
  27. Ma, M., Jain, L. C., & Anderson, P. (Eds.). (2014). Virtual, augmented reality and serious games for healthcare 1 (Vol. 1). Springer.Google Scholar
  28. McCall, N., Komisar, H. L., Petersons, A., & Moore, S. (2001). Medicare home health before and after the BBA. Health Affairs, 20(3), 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., et al. (2009). ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System. In ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software (Vol. 3, pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  30. Reiners, T., Teräs, H., Chang, V., Wood, L. C., Gregory, S., Gibson, D., et al. (2014). Authentic, immersive, and emotional experience in virtual learning environments: the fear of dying as an important learning experience in a simulation. Transformative, Innovative and Engaging. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Teaching Learning Forum (pp. 1–14). University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  31. Rizzo, A., Pair, J., Graap, K., Manson, B., McNerney, P. J., Wiederhold, B., et al. (2006). A virtual reality exposure therapy application for Iraq War military personnel with post traumatic stress disorder: From training to toy to treatment. NATO Security through Science Series E. Human and Societal Dynamics, 6, 235.Google Scholar
  32. Rus-Calafell, M., Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J., Botella, C., & Baños, R. M. (2013). Virtual reality exposure and imaginal exposure in the treatment of fear of flying: A pilot study. Behavior Modification, 0145445513482969.Google Scholar
  33. Sallis, J., & Owen, N. (1997). Ecological models. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 403–424). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(4), 332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tamura, T., Yonemitsu, S., Itoh, A., Oikawa, D., Kwakami, A., Higashi, Y., et al. (2004). Is an Entertainment Robot Useful in the Care of Elderly People With Severe Dementia? Journal of Gerentology: Medical Sciences, 59(1), 83–85.Google Scholar
  37. Tenorth, M., Perzylo, A. C., Lafrenz, R., & Beetz, M. (2012). The roboearth language: Representing and exchanging knowledge about actions, objects, and environments. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 1284–1289). IEEE.Google Scholar
  38. Wada, K., & Shibata, T. (2007, October). Living with seal robots—It’s sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5), 972–980.Google Scholar
  39. Walcott-Bryant, A., Kaess, M., Johannsson, H., & Leonard, J. J. (2012). Dynamic pose graph SLAM: Long-term mapping in low dynamic environments. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (pp. 1871–1878).Google Scholar
  40. Wiemeyer, J., & Kliem, A. (2011). Serious games in prevention and rehabilitation—A new panacea for elderly people? European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, 9, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wittenberg, R., Pickard, L., Comas-Herrera, A., Davies, B., & Darton, R. (1998). Demand for Long-term Care: Projections of Long-term Care Finance for Elderly People. Canterbury: PSSRU, University of Kent. Available from the PSSRU website at www.ukc.ac.uk/PSSRU.
  42. Wu, Y. C., Teng, M. C., & Tsai, Y. J. (2009). Robot docking station for automatic battery exchanging and charging. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics. ROBIO 2008 (pp. 1043–1046). IEEE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Micael Santos Couceiro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gonçalo Nuno Figueiredo Dias
    • 2
  1. 1.Ingeniarius, Ltd.CoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education (CIDAF)University of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations