Advertisement

Moving on Towards a Workable Climate Regime

  • Jaime de Melo
Conference paper

Abstract

The Paris Agreement (PA) signed by 175 parties is now a Treaty since a quorum of signatories has been obtained. This Treaty is really the first important step taken to limit temperature increase, as pledges, if sustained and far more ambitious beyond 2030, would drastically limit the projected temperature increase from projections in the absence of measures to limit emissions of greenhouse gases. Contributions however fall short of the intentions to limit temperature increase to the +1.5 to +2 °C range since the onset of industrialization. Drawing on recent contributions, this paper reviews where we stand in tackling four challenges ahead: (i) taking fuller cognizance of the accumulating scientific evidence calling for urgent action; (ii) designing an architecture that will render effective the blend of ‘bottom-up’ and ‘top-down’ approaches; (iii) choosing policy options and tackling the slow transition to a low-carbon economy, and; (iv) raising finance and addressing burden sharing.

JEL codes

O44 F18 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Scott Barrett and Carlo Carraro for fruitful collaboration, Jean-Marie Grether, Jie He, Nicole Mathys and participants at the XXVIII Mondragone seminar June 23–4, 2016 for comments and Adrien Corneille and Vincent Nossek for logistic support. I am grateful to the French National Research Agency for its support under program ANR-10-LABX-14-01. Views and errors are mine and do not reflect those of the institutions to which I am affiliated.

References

  1. Aldy J (2014) The crucial role of policy surveillance in international climate policy. Clim Change 126(3):279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angelsen A (2015) REDD+: What should come next? Chap. 28 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldy J, William P et al (2016) Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris agreement. Nat Climate Change 6Google Scholar
  4. Averchenkova A, Nicholas S, Zenghelis D (2014) Taming the beasts of ‘burden-sharing’: an analysis of equitable mitigation actions and approaches to 2030 mitigation pledges. Grantham Resarch Institute on Climate Change and the EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  5. Babonneau Frédéric, Haurie Alain, Vielle Marc (2016) Assessment of balanced burden—sharing in the 2050 EU climate/energy roadmap: a metamodeling approach. Clim Change 134:505–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barrett S, Carraro C, de Melo J (eds) [BCM] (2015) Towards a workable and effective climate regime. VoxEU.org, eBook, CEPR and FERDIGoogle Scholar
  7. Bigio A (2015) Towards resilient and low-carbon cities. Chap. 30 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  8. Burtraw D (2015) The regulatory approach in US climate policy. Chap. 17 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  9. Bodansky D (2016) The legal character of the Paris agreement. Review of European, comparative, and international environmental law, ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  10. Burke M, Dykema J et al (2015) Incorporating climate uncertainty into estimates of climate change impacts. Rev Econom Statist 97(2):461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collier P (2015) Curbing carbon without curbing development. Chap. 29 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  12. Calel R, Stainforth DA, Dietz S (2015) Tall tales and fat tails: the science and economics of extreme warming. Climactic Change 132:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chancel L, Piketty T (2015) Carbon and inequality: from kyoto to Paris: trends in the global inequality of carbon emissions (1998–2013) and prospects for an equitable carbon fund. PSEGoogle Scholar
  14. Corneille A, de Melo J (2016) Les défis de l’Afrique Sub-saharienne face au changement climatique. Policy brief#165, FERDIGoogle Scholar
  15. De Coninck H, Shikha B (2015) Meaningful technology development and transfer: a necessary condition for a viable climate regime. Chap. 31 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  16. De Conto Robert, Pollard David (2016) Contribution of antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature 531:591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Melo J, Vijil M (2016) The critical mass approach to achieve a deal on green goods and services: What is on the Table? How Much to Expect? Environ and Resour Econ 21(3):393–414Google Scholar
  18. Dietz S, Stern N (2015) Endogenous growth, convexity of damage and climate risk: how Nordhaus’ framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions. Econ J 574–617Google Scholar
  19. Fischer C (2015) Options for avoiding carbon leakage. Chap. 21 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  20. Gollier Christian, Jullien Bruno, Treich Nicolas (2000) Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the ‘precautionary principle’. J Public Econ 75(2):229–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Green Jessica (2014) Rethinking private authority: agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  22. Hourcade JC (2015) Harnessing the animal spirits of finance for a low-carbon transition. Chap. 34 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  23. Henderson JV, Storeygard A, Deichman U (2017) Has climate change driven urbanization in africa? J Dev Econ 124:60–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keohane R, Victor D (2015) After the failure of top-down mandates: the role of experimental governance in climate policy. Chap. 14 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  25. Massetti E (2015) The macroeconomics of climate policy: investments and financial flows. Chap. 32 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  26. Mathys N, de Melo J (2011) Political economy aspects of climate change mitigation efforts. World Econ 34(11):1938–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mavroidis P, de Melo J (2015) Climate change policies and the WTO: greening the GATT, revisited. Chap. 16 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  28. Mo K (2016) Financing energy efficiency buildings in chinese cities. Paulson InstituteGoogle Scholar
  29. Myhrvold NP, Caldeira K (2012) Greenhouse gases, climate change and the transition from coal to low-carbon electricity. Environ Res Lett 7(1)Google Scholar
  30. Nordhaus W (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  31. Nordhaus W (2015) Climate clubs: overcoming free riding in international climate policy. Am Econ Rev 105(4):1339–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parry I, Veung C, Heine D (2014) How much carbon pricing is in countries’ own interests? the critical role of co-benefits. IMF WP/14/174Google Scholar
  33. Schelling T (2007) Climate change: the uncertainties, the certainties, and what they imply for action. Economists’ VoiceGoogle Scholar
  34. Schmalensee R (1998) Greenhouse policy architecture and institutions. Econ Policy Issues Clim Change 137–158Google Scholar
  35. Schmid G (2012) Technology transfer under the CDM: the role of country characteristics. Clim Policy 12(6):722–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stavins RN (2015) Linkage of regional, national and sub-national policies in a future international climate agreement. Chap 20 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  37. Stern N (2013) The structure of economic modeling and the potential impacts of climate change: grafting gross underestimation of risk onto already narrow science models. J Econ Lit 51(3):838–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stocker T (2015) Implications of climate science for negotiators. Chap 2 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  39. Stewart R, Oppenheimer M, Ruddyk B (2015) A Building blocs strategy for global climate change. Chap. 15 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  40. TCFD (2016) Phase I report of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Financial Stability BoardGoogle Scholar
  41. Toman M (2015) International cooperation in advancing energy technologies for deep decarbonisation. Chap. 22 in BCMGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner G, Zeckhauser R (2016) Confronting deep and persistent climate uncertainty. Kennedy School, DP#16-14Google Scholar
  43. Wara M, Victor D (2008) Trading in fake carbon credits: problems with the clean development mechanism. Friends of the EarthGoogle Scholar
  44. World Bank (2009) World development report: reshaping economic geography. Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  45. World Bank (2010) World development report: development and climate change. Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.FERDI (Fondation pour les Études et Recherches sur le Développement International)Clermont-FerrandFrance
  2. 2.CEPRLondonUK
  3. 3.Geneva Business SchoolGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations