Advertisement

Technological Immersion in Industrial Engineering for a Project Management Course to Develop Dual Use Technology

  • José Luis Roca-González
  • Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano
  • Germán Rodríguez-Bermúdez
  • Pedro José García-Laencina
  • Antonio Juan Briones-Peñalver
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)

Abstract

Technological Immersion (TI) is defined as an approach process to current industrial activity. It is focused on improving the competitive standards of the production activity by analyzing innovation processes, which were regulated by any standard that summarizes most of the international and relevant knowledge on Innovation Management Processes (for Spain, this is the regulation UNE166000). It allows using education on Project Management as a basic foundation to develop dual use technologies for security and defense purposes and for any other industry framework as well. The aim of this case study is to compile, under a TI scope, the experiences acquired by the students of the fourth course at the University Centre of Defense at the Spanish Air Force Academy, when studying the last generation of films that may have high strategic interest for defense as well as for many industrial applications. The TI was performed through a workshop about UNE166000 (Spanish Regulation), McLuhan Tetrad and other lessons on Innovation Management, the main purpose being to teach the students how to draft a professional report about the technological and knowledge transfer opportunities that these films may generate in order to develop new industrial advantages on dual use industry.

Keywords

Technological immersion Project management UNE166000 Dual use technology 

References

  1. AENOR (2013) Gestión de la I + D+i: Normas UNE. Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación, MadridGoogle Scholar
  2. Chibás Ortíz F, Borroto Carmona G, Almeida Santos F (2014) Managing creativity in collaborative virtual learning environments e: a DL corporate project. Comunicar 22(43):143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DGAM (2015) Dirección General de Armamento y Material. Resolución DEF/1453/2010. Boletín Oficial del Estado de 16 de 04 de 2015, MadridGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferderman M, De KerKchove D (2003) McLuhan for managers: new tools for new thinking. Viking Canada, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  5. Hasso-Plattner-Institut (2009) School of design thinking. In: Germany HA (ed) Recuperado el 2011, de http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/d_school/home.htm: http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/d_school/home.htm
  6. Hempell A (1996) Exploring the process of the tetrad. The resonating interval. (S. F. University, ed). CanadaGoogle Scholar
  7. Hernández Sellés N, González Sanmamed M, Muñoz Carril PC (2014) Planning collaborative learning in virtual environments. Comunicar 21(42):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kline S, Rosenberg N (1986) An overview of innovation. In: Landau R, Rosenberg N (eds) The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth. Washington, pp 270–300Google Scholar
  9. Lancho de León JL (1999) La industria española de Defensa. Boletín económico de ICE, Información Comercial Española (2630): 21–30Google Scholar
  10. López O, Blanco M, Guerra S (2009) Evolución de los modelos de la gestión de innovación. Innovaciones de Negocios 5(2):251–264Google Scholar
  11. McLuhan C, Powers B (1989) The global village. Oxford Universitary PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Novelli C, Pincolini C (2005) Towards a knowledge management: production of cultural and educational contents. Comunicar 24:163–170Google Scholar
  13. Sameshima P (2006) Household at the shore: a Marshall McLuhan metaphor. J Can Assoc Curric Stud 4(1):51–58Google Scholar
  14. Steinbeck R (2011) Building creative competence in globally distributed courses through design thinking. Comunicar XIX(37):27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Verstraete G (2011) The Tetrad: a dialectical model of media ecology theory (U. o. Alberta, ed). HASTAC, Humanities, Arts, Science and Technology Alliance and Collaborative, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  16. Zamanillo Elgezabal I, Intxaurburu Clemente G, Velasco Balmaseda EM (2007) Evolución de los modelos sobre el proceso de innovacióndesde el modelo lineal hasta los sistemas de innovación, 2. Asociación Europea de Dirección y Economía de Empresa, Palma de Mallorca, pp 28–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Luis Roca-González
    • 1
  • Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano
    • 2
  • Germán Rodríguez-Bermúdez
    • 1
  • Pedro José García-Laencina
    • 1
  • Antonio Juan Briones-Peñalver
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Group in Engineering and Dual Use Technologies. Department of Engineering and Applied TechnologiesUniversity Centre of Defence at the Spanish Air Force Academy (CUD)Santiago de La RiberaSpain
  2. 2.Research Group in Engineering and Dual Use Technologies. Department of SciencesUniversity Centre of Defence at the Spanish Air Force Academy (CUD)Santiago de la RiberaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Business Economics. Faculty of Business StudiesTechnical University of Cartagena (UPCT)CartagenaSpain

Personalised recommendations