Young’s Modulus of Al–Si–Mg–Cu Based Alloy Under Different Heat Treatment Processes

  • Sajjad Amirkhanlou
  • Yijie Zhang
  • Shouxun Ji
  • Zhongyun Fan
Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Young’s modulus of metallic materials is one of the most important mechanical properties in controlling structural design. The increase of Young’s modulus in cast aluminium alloys is attractive for lightweight structures. In the present investigation, the Young’s modulus of an Al–Si–Mg–Cu alloy reinforced with TiB2 and Mg2Si phases was investigated under different heat treatment processes, including T4, T6, T7 and O. The microstructural evaluation and mechanical properties of the developed Al–Si–Mg–Cu alloys were examined by X-ray diffractometer (XRD), scanning and high resolution transmission electron microscopes (SEM and HRTEM), ultrasonic pulse technique and tensile test. The results revealed that the alloys, in all heat treatment conditions, mainly consist of Si, Mg2Si and TiB2 phases, which are responsible for the increase of Young’s modulus. HRTEM micrographs showed the formation of incoherent, clean and smooth interfaces between aluminium matrix and TiB2 particles. The alloys with over 90 GPa Young’s modulus are still castable for making shaped castings. In comparison with the conventional aluminium alloys that have Young’s modulus at a level of 70 GPa, 30% increase of Young’s modulus can be achieved by the developed alloys.

Keywords

Aluminium alloys Microstructure Mechanical properties Young’s modulus Heat treatment 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from Jaguar Range Rover (JLR) [grant number R33232] is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Geng et al., The solution treatment of in-situ sub-micron TiB2/2024 Al composite. Mater. Des. 98, 186–193 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Li, M. Zheng, G. Chen, Mechanism and kinetic model of in-situ TiB2/7055Al nanocomposites synthesized under high intensity ultrasonic field. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mater Sci. Ed. 26, 920–925 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Kumar, V.S. Sarma, B. Murty, Effect of temperature on the wear behavior of Al-7Si-TiB2 in-situ composites. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 40, 223–231 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.M. Sree Manu et al., Structure and properties of modified compocast microsilica reinforced aluminum matrix composite. Mater. Des. 88, 294–301 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Taherzadeh Mousavian, Fabrication of aluminum matrix composites reinforced with nano- to micrometer-sized SiC particles. Mater. Des. 89, 58–70 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.I.H. Committee, ASM handbook, vol 2, Properties and selection: nonferrous alloys and special purpose materials, in ASM International (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Frommeyer, S. Beer, K. Von Oldenburg, Microstructure and mechanical properties of mechanically alloyed intermetallic Mg2Si-Al alloys. Zeitschrift für Metallkunde 85, 372–377 (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Lu, M. Lai, M. Hoe, Formaton of nanocrystalline Mg2Si and Mg2Si dispersion strengthened Mg-Al alloy by mechanical alloying. Nanostruct. Mater. 10, 551–563 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Ammar et al., Influence of aging parameters on the tensile properties and quality index of Al-9 Pct Si-1.8 Pct Cu-0.5 Pct Mg 354-type casting alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 43, 61–73 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Bonnet, V. Daeschler, G. Petitgand, High modulus steels: new requirement of automotive market. How to take up challenge? Can. Metall. Q. 53, 243–252 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Yue, L. Lu, M. Lai, Application of thermodynamic calculation in the in-situ process of Al/TiB2. Compos. Struct. 47, 691–694 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.K. Gupta et al., Development of TiB2 reinforced in-situ Ti aluminide matrix composite through reaction synthesis. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 63, 715–718 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Wang, Q.Y. Han, Particle pushing during solidification of metals and alloys, in Advanced Materials Research (2014), pp. 1513–1517Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Sun et al., Effect of alloy elements on the morphology transformation of TiB2 particles in Al matrix. Micron 70, 21–25 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Calderon et al., Ostwald ripening in concentrated alloys. Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 991–1000 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    H.-W. Huang, B.-L. Ou, Evolution of precipitation during different homogenization treatments in a 3003 aluminum alloy. Mater. Des. 30, 2685–2692 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajjad Amirkhanlou
    • 1
  • Yijie Zhang
    • 1
  • Shouxun Ji
    • 1
  • Zhongyun Fan
    • 1
  1. 1.BCASTBrunel University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations