Influence of Sticking on the Roll Topography at Twin-Roll Casting of Aluminum Alloys

  • Olexandr GrydinEmail author
  • Florian Nürnberger
  • Mirko Schaper
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


The formation of strips at twin-roll casting depends on the state of the roll surface. The processing conditions, which are characterized by high metal-tool interface temperatures and compression stresses, provoke sticking between the cast material and the rolls. This effects changing of the tool’s topography, impairment of the strip’s surface quality and interference of its flatness. In the scope of this study the evolution of roll’s topography at twin-roll casting of 3 mm thick strips of aluminum alloys EN AW-1070 and EN AW-6082 without any release agents was experimentally analyzed using laboratory casting unit. The effect of repetitive tool’s self-cleaning during processing of the EN AW-6082 alloy was observed, whereas aluminum of technical purity showed intensive sticking on the roll surface. In the last case micro-profiling of the tool’s surface is not more efficient and release agents have to be used for improvement of the strip’s formation conditions.


Twin-roll casting Thin strip Aluminum alloys Sticking Roll topography 



The authors would like to thank Dr.-Ing. Gregor Mroz for supporting the micro-relief topography measurements.


  1. 1.
    T. Furuya et al., Method and apparatus of continuously casting a metal sheet. Patent EP0409645B1 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Minamida, M. Kido, F. Nishizawa, Cooling drum for casting thin cast piece; device for and method of forming dimples on peripheral surface of said drum. Patent EP0577833A (1992)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Yukumoto, M. Ozawa, H. Yamane, A pair of cooling rolls for a twin-roll type cooling apparatus for producing rapidly solidified strip. Patent EP0396862B1 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Mahapatra, J. Freemann, L. Strezov, Casting stainless steel strip on surface with specified roughness. Patent WO095/13889 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Badowski, “Die Primärerstarrung beim Dünnbandgießen—Einfluss auf die Bandbildung und Produktqualität”, Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 2005, 182Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Lauscher, “Verbesserung der Oberflächenqualität von Gießrollen für das Dünnbandgießen nach dem Zwei-Rollen-Verfahren”, Dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 2008, 138Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Yun, S. Lokyer, J.D. Hunt, Twin roll casting of aluminium alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 280, 116–123 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Basson, D. Letzig, Aluminium twin roll casting transfers benefits to magnesium. Alum. Int. Today 12, 19–21 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. Grydin et al., Experimental twin-roll casting equipment for production of thin strips. Metall. Min. Ind. 2(5), 348–354 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Grydin, M. Schaper, V. Danchenko, Twin-Roll Casting of High-Strength Age-Hardened Aluminium Alloys. Metall. Min. Ind. 3(7), 7–16 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Stolbchenko, O. Grydin, M. Schaper, Twin-roll casting and finishing treatment of thin strips of the hardening aluminum alloy EN AW-6082. Mater. Today: Proc. 2, 32–38 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Valberg, T. Malvic, Metal flow in die channels of extrusion investigated by an experimental grid pattern technique. Paper presented at the 5th International Extrusion Technology Seminar (Chicago, Illinois, 19–22 May 1992), p. 31Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olexandr Grydin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Florian Nürnberger
    • 2
  • Mirko Schaper
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Materials SciencePaderborn UniversityPaderbornGermany
  2. 2.Institut Für WerkstoffkundeLeibniz Universität Hannover, An der Universität 2GarbsenGermany

Personalised recommendations