Advertisement

Introduction: Beyond Elections: Representation Circuits and Political Intermediation

  • Gisela Zaremberg
  • Adrián Gurza Lavalle
  • Valeria Guarneros-Meza
Chapter
Part of the Studies of the Americas book series (STAM)

Abstract

This introductory chapter offers a new conceptual framework based on the language of intermediation to highlight analytically new horizons of indirect politics whose range has usually been reduced to electoral representation. Without disregarding or detracting from this form of representation, the framework provides two main, new conceptual tools. First, a typological concept of “representation circuits” systematizes the heterogeneity of actors, repertories and rules as different channels of political intermediation. These can be present in the use of corporative negotiation, organizational participation, charismatic bonds between leaders and people, and technical-bureaucratic implementation. Second, considering the three most important dimensions in representation theory (authorization, accountability and representativeness) the “cube of political intermediation” (CPI) offers an analytical three-dimensional model in which it is possible to locate and compare different empirical cases of political intermediation. In sum, this chapter exposes crucial conceptual tools with which to analyse a wider repertoire of forms of intermediation for the access and defence of citizens’ rights and public services across time and space.

Keywords

Civil Society Organization Representation Circuit Political Representation Electoral Representation Social Accountability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Aguilar, L. 2004. Recepción y desarrollo de la disciplina de política pública en México. Un estudio introductorio. Sociológica 19(54): 15–38.Google Scholar
  2. Aibar, J., ed. 2007. Vox Populi. Vol. 1. FLACSO: Mexico.Google Scholar
  3. Aibar, J., and L.D. Vázquez. 2009. ¿Autoritarismo o democracia?: Hugo Chávez y Evo Morales. Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  4. Alcoff, L. 1992. The Problem of Speaking for Others. Cultural Critique 20 (Winter, 1991–1992): 5–32, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arditi, B., ed. 2000. El reverso de la diferencia: Identidad y política [The Underside of Difference: Identity and Politics]. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
  6. ———., ed. 2005. ¿Democracia post-liberal?: el espacio político de las asociaciones. Vol. 147. Rubí (Barcelona): Anthropos Editorial; Mexico: UNAM. Faculty of Political and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Auyero, J. 1999. Performing Evita a Tale of Two Peronist Women. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 27(4): 461–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balán, P. E. 2010. Conflicto y democracia. Notas sobre una discusión teórica irresuelta [Mimeo]. http://www.academia.edu/1611768/Conflicto_y_democracia_notas_sobre_una_discusi%C3%B3n_te%C3%B3rica_irresuelta
  9. Bensusán, G., and E. O’Connor. 2015. Innovation in Policy-making in City Governments: Openings to Change Minimum Wage Policy in Mexico City and Los Angeles. Paper presented in the Conferencia Anual de la Red para el Estudio de la Economía Política de América Latina (REPAL), July 7 and 8, Montevideo, Uruguay.Google Scholar
  10. Bensusán, G., and M. Subiñas. 2014. Representación e intermediación en el ámbito del trabajo: actores, recursos y estrategias. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Soaicles 59(220): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burke, E. 1774 (1942). Carta a los electores de Bristol. In Textos politicos, ed. E. Burke. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1792. An Extract from Letter to Sir Hercules Langrishe, on the Subject of The Roman Catholics of Ireland. http://www.ourcivilisation.com/smartboard/shop/burke/extracts/chap18.html
  13. Burt, R. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cameron, M., A. Hershberg, E. Sharpe, and E. Kenneth. 2012. New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campilongo, C.F. 1988. Representação política. Sao Paulo: Ática.Google Scholar
  16. Castiglione, D., and M. Warren. 2006. Rethinking Representation: Nine Theoretical Issues. In Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Chicago: MPSA.Google Scholar
  17. De Sousa Santos, B. 2002. Democratizar la democracia. Los caminos de la democracia participativa. Rio de Janeiro: Civilizacao Brasilera.Google Scholar
  18. DeBardeleben, J., and J. Pammet. 2009. Activating the Citizen: Dilemmas of Participation in Europe and Canada. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dowbor, M. 2009. Origins of Successful Health Sector Reform: Public Health and Institutional Opportunities in Brazil. Paper presented in IPSAs Twenty-first World Congress of Political Science, Santiago.Google Scholar
  20. Downs, A. 1991[1957]. Una teoría económica de la acción política en una democracia. In Lecturas de teoría política positiva, comp. Josep Colomer. Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.Google Scholar
  21. Feinberg, R., C.H. Waisman, and L. Zamosc. 2006. Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fox, J. 2006. Sociedad civil y políticas de rendición de cuentas. Perfiles Latinoamericanos 13(27). Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  23. Fung, A., and E.O. Wright. 2003. Deepening Democracy. Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Goldfrank, B. 2011. Deepening Local Democracy in Latin America: Participation, Decentralization and the Left. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gurza Lavalle, A. 2014. Dualidade, representatividade e representação democrática. In O Papel da Teoria Política Contemporânea: Justiça, Constituição, Democracia e Representação, orgs. Adrián Gurza Lavalle, Álvaro de Vita and Cicero Araújo. Brazil: Alameda.Google Scholar
  26. Gurza Lavalle, A., and C. Araujo. 2008. O debate sobre a representacaon politica no Brasil: nota introdutória. Caderno CRH 21: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gurza Lavalle, A., P. Houtzager, and G. Castello. 2006. Democracia, pluralização da representação e sociedade civil. Lua Nova (Impresso) 67: 49–103.Google Scholar
  28. Gurza Lavalle, A., and E. Isunza Vera, coords. 2010. La innovación democrática en América Latina. Tramas y nudos de la representación, la participación y el control social. Mexico: CIESAS/Universidad Veracruzana.Google Scholar
  29. Gurza Lavalle, A., and G. Zaremberg. 2014. Más allá de la representación y del clientelismo: hacia un lenguaje de la intermediación política. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Year LIX, May–August 2014, 221: 19–50.Google Scholar
  30. Gurza Lavalle, A., and M. von Büllow. 2015. Institutionalized Brokers and Collective Actors: Different Types, Similar Challenges. In Social Movement Dynamics: New Perspectives on Theory Research from Latin America, Org., Federico M. Rossi and Marisa von Bülow, 1st ed., 157–180. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Harary, F. 1969. Graph Theory. Massachusets: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, E., and J. Gaventa. 2002. Concepts of Citizenship: A Review. IDS Development Bibliography 19. Brighton: IDS.
  33. Jordan, A., R. Wurzel, and A. Zito. 2005. The Raice of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsep Government? Political Studies 53: 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kooiman, J. 2000. Societal Governance: Levels, Modes, and Orders of Social-Political Interaction. In Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, ed. J. Pierre. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Laclau, E. 1990. Nuevas reflexiones sobre la revolución de nuestro tiempo. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2000a. Nuevas reflexiones sobre la revolución de nuestro tiempo. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2000b. Sujeto de la política, política del sujeto. In El reverso de la diferencia: Identidad y política, ed. Benjamín Arditi. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
  38. Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  39. Lasswell, H. 1992. La orientación hacia las políticas. In El estudio de las políticas públicas, ed. A.F. Luis. Mexico: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.Google Scholar
  40. Lefort, C. 1992. La representación no agota a la democracia. In ¿Qué queda de la representación política?, comp. Mario R. Dos Santos. Argentina: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
  41. Long, N. 2007. Sociología del desarrollo: una perspectiva centrada en el actor. Mexico: CIESAS y El Colegio de San Luis Potosí.Google Scholar
  42. MacKinnon, M., and L. Feoli’s. 2013. Representation and Effectiveness in Latin America Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Mair, P. 2005. Democracy beyond Parties. Irvine: Uniersity of California, Center for the Study of Democracy http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vs886v9.Google Scholar
  44. Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manin, B., A. Przeworski, and S. Stokes. 1999. Introduction. Elections and Representation. In Accountability and Representation, ed. A. Przeworski, S.C. Stokes and B. Manin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mansbridge, J. 2003. Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review 97(4): 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marsh, D., and M. Smith. 2000. Understanding Policy Networks: Towards a Dialectical Approach. Political Studies 48: 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mazmanian, D., and P. Sabatier. 1981. Effective Policy Implementation. Washington, DC: Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  50. Mouffe, C. 2003. La paradoja democrática. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
  51. Novaro, Marcos. 2000. Representación y liderazgo en las democracias contemporáneas. Rosario: Homo Sapiens Ediciones.Google Scholar
  52. Offe, C. 1990. Contradicciones del Estado de Bienestar. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
  53. Pitkin, H. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  54. Pressman, J.L., and A.B. Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland: Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Przeworski, A. 2002. Accountability social en América Latina y más allá. In Controlando la política: Ciudadanos y medios en las nuevas democracias latinoamericanas, ed. Enrique Peruzzotti and Catalina Smulovitz. Buenos Aires: Temas.Google Scholar
  56. Ranciere, J. 1996. El odio a la democracia. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.Google Scholar
  57. Rhodes, R.A.W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivility and Accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  58. ———. 2000. Governance and Public Administration. In Debating Governance: Authority, Steering and Democracy, ed. J. Pierre. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Sartori, G. 1980[1976]. Partidos y sistemas de partidos. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar
  60. Saward, M. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schedler, A. 1999. Conceptualizing Accountability. In The Self-restraining State. Power and Accountability in New Democracies, ed. Andreas Schedler, Larry Diamond, and Marc F. Plattner, 13–28. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  62. Schmitter, P. 1992. The Consolidation of Democracy and Representation of Social Groups. The American Behavioral Scientist 35(4): 422–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmitter, P., and G. Lehmbruch. 1979. Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Selee, A., and E. Peruzzotti. 2009. Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Sigal, S., and E. Verón. 1986. Perón o muerte. Los fundamentos discursivos del fenómeno peronista. Buenos Aires: Editorial Legasa.Google Scholar
  66. Sikkink, K., and H.J. Kim. 2013. The Justice Cascade: The Origins and Effectiveness of Prosecutions of Human Rights Violations. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9(November): 269–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, G. 2009. Democratic Innovations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smulovitz, C. 2008. La política por otros medios. Judicialización y movilización legal en la Argentina. Revista Desarrollo Económico 48(190/191, July–December): 287–305.Google Scholar
  69. Smulovitz, C., and E. Peruzzotti. 2006. Enforcing the Rule of Law. Social Accountability in the New Latin American Democracies. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  70. Stein, E., and M. Tommasi 2006. La política de las políticas públicas. Política y Gobierno 13(2): 393–416. Mexico: CIDE.Google Scholar
  71. Stovel, K., and L. Shaw. 2012. Brokerage. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tornquist, O. 2010. Rethinking Popular Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Urbinati, N. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vieira, M.B., and D. Runciman. 2008. Representation. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  75. Von Bülow, M. 2011. Brokers in Action: Transnational Coalitions and Trade Agreements in the Americas. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 16(2): 165–180.Google Scholar
  76. Wampler, B., and L. Avritzer. 2005. The Spread of Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: From Radical Democracy to Participatory Good Government. Journal of Latin American Urban Studies 7: 37–52.Google Scholar
  77. Young, I.M. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zaremberg, G. 2012. Redes y jerarquías. Representación, participación y gobernanza local en América Latina. Vol. 1. Canada: IDRC; Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  79. Zaremberg, G., and A. Muñoz. 2013. Redes y jerarquías. Representación, participación y conflicto local en América Latina. Vol. 2. Canada: IDRC; Mexico: FLACSO.Google Scholar
  80. Žižek, S. 1999. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Dictionaries Consulted

  1. DRAE, Diccionario de la Real Academia Española: http://www.rae.es/
  2. Diccionario Griego Español: http://dge.cchs.csic.es/xdge/
  3. Diccionario Latín Español, Pierre Grimal: http://es.glosbe.com/la/es/ Grimal, Pierre (2010).
  4. Diccionario de Mitología Griega y Romana, Pierre Grimal, Buenos Aires, Paidos-Ibérica: http://www.miembrosadepac.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Grimal-Diccionario-Mitologia-Griega-y-Romana.pdf
  5. Etymology Dictionary: http://www.etymonline.com/
  6. English Dictionary: http://www.oed.com/
  7. The Oxford Classical Dictionary: http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gisela Zaremberg
    • 1
  • Adrián Gurza Lavalle
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Valeria Guarneros-Meza
    • 5
  1. 1.Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO)Mexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Universidade de São Paulo (USP)São PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Center for Metropolitan Studies (CEM)São PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Brazilian Center for Analysis and Planning (CEBRAP)São PauloBrazil
  5. 5.De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations