Advertisement

Discourse of Hedonism and Extravagance: Tension Between the Agency and the Actor

  • Shaoying Zhang
  • Derek McGhee
Chapter
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)

Abstract

This chapter will show that the discourse on hedonism and extravagance is about the tension between the subject’s agency and the self in the struggle for balance between the restrictions laid down by the Party and the freedom officials enjoy (or more accurately, enjoyed). In this struggle, the normative power of the Party “works on” its members who live hedonistically and extravagantly through reinforcing “their duty to be.” Thus, as we will show, the new disciplinary measures adopted by the Party are dedicated to the regulation of officials’ individual behaviours in order to turn officials’ gaze towards their corrupt self as the site from whence their ethical self might emerge.

Thus, the discourse of the care of the people (the masses) includes the care of the self through denying the self. It is expected that by regulating the everyday behaviours of officials, the ethical subjectivities of officials can be reformulated and through this collective process the morality of the Party can be restored. This process can be described as a means of restoring the ethical virtue of officials through governing their habits. In this context, respect for one’s duty thus becomes a sacrificial exercise (through the abandoning of enjoyable but prohibited practices) on the self. It is assumed that living ascetically is a sign of an ethical subject and it is further assumed that ethical subjectivity will lead to virtuous work. Thus, the austerity measures (such as the eight-point code) are not only associated with the imposition of a doctrinal principle but are also for creating a sense of sacrifice among officials, which is deemed essential for creating a sense of respect for their duty.

Keywords

Public Fund Provincial Government Party Member County Government Disciplinary Department 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Ackerly, Brooke A. 2005. Is Liberalism the Only Way Toward Democracy? Confucianism and Democracy. Political Theory 33(4): 547–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agamben, Giorgio. 2013a. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2013b. Opus Dei: An Archaeology of Duty. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2015. Stasis: Civil War as a Political Paradigm (Homo Sacer II, 2), trans. Nicholas Heron. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Agamben, Giorgio, Luca D’Isanto, and Kevin Attell. 2009. The Signature of All Things: On Method. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  6. Bevir, Mark, and Rod A.W. Rhodes. 2010. The State as Cultural Practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, Peter. 2011. Confucian China and Jeffersonian America: Beyond Liberal Democracy. Asian Studies Review 35(1): 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De, Soumick. 2013. Law, Reason, Truth: Three Paradigmatic Problems Concerning Faith. KRITIKE: An Online Journal of Philosophy 7(2): 19–32.Google Scholar
  9. Dillon, Michael. 2015. Biopolitics of Security A Political Analytic of Finitude. Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Dirlik, Arif. 2002. Modernity as History: Post-Revolutionary China, Globalization and the Question of Modernity. Social History 27(1): 16–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan, Ying. 2002. Ganxi’s Consequences: Personal Gains at Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics 38(4): 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault, Michel. 1997. The Essential Works, 1954±1984, Vol. 1: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. The New Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2005. The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Collège De France 1981–1982. Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, Michel, and J.R. Carrette. 1999. Religion and Culture. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gong, Ting. 2008a. Objective Responsibility Vs. Subjective Responsibility: A Critical Reading of the CCP’s Internal Supervision Regulation. China Review 8(2): 77–102.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2008b. The Party Discipline Inspection in China: Its Evolving Trajectory and Embedded Dilemmas. Crime, Law and Social Change 49(2): 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hairong, Yan. 2003. Neoliberal Governmentality and Neohumanism: Organizing Suzhi/Value Flow Through Labor Recruitment Networks. Cultural Anthropology 18(4): 493–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillman, Ben. 2010. Factions and Spoils: Examining Political Behavior within the Local State In China. The China Journal: 1–18.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, Lisa. 2006. Autonomous Choices and Patriotic Professionalism: On Governmentality in Late-Socialist China. Economy and Society 35(4): 550–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horujy, Sergey S. 2015. Practices of the Self and Spiritual Practices: Michel Foucault and the Eastern Christian Discourse. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Hualing, Fu. 2013. Stability and Anticorruption Initiatives: Is There a Chinese Model? University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper (2013/032).Google Scholar
  22. Kim, Sungmoon. 2010. Beyond Liberal Civil Society: Confucian Familism and Relational Strangership. Philosophy East and West 60(4): 476–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, Jim. 1993. The Passion of Michel Foucault. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  24. Oksenberg, Michel. 1970. Getting Ahead and Along in Communist China: The Ladder of Success on the Eve of the Cultural Revolution. In Party Leadership and Revolutionary Power in China, ed. John Wilson Lewis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Osburg, John. 2013. Anxious Wealth: Money and Morality among China’s New Rich. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Shadnam, Masoud. 2015. Theorizing Morality in Context. International Review of Sociology 25(3): 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, Graeme. 2009. Political Machinations in a Rural County. The China Journal 62(July): 29–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2015. Getting Ahead in Rural China: The Elite-Cadre Divide and Its Implications for Rural Governance. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(94): 594–612.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, Chih-Ming. 2012. Geopolitics of Literature: Foreign Literature Studies in Early Twentieth-Century China. Cultural Studies 26(5): 740–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weber, M. 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the “Spirit” of Capitalism and Other Writings. Penguin.Google Scholar
  31. Yang, Mayfair Mei-Hui. 1988. The Modernity of Power in the Chinese Socialist Order. Cultural Anthropology 3(4): 408–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yeh, Emily T., Kevin J. O’Brien, and Jingzhong Ye. 2013. Rural Politics in Contemporary China. Journal of Peasant Studies 40(6): 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu, Olivia. 2008. Corruption In China’s Economic Reform: A Review of Recent Observations and Explanations. Crime, Law and Social Change 50(3): 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yuen, Samson. 2014. Disciplining the Party. Xi Jinping’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and Its Limits. China Perspectives 2014(3): 41–47.Google Scholar
  35. Zhang, S., and D. McGhee. 2014. Social Policies and Ethnic Conflict in China: Lessons from Xinjiang. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaoying Zhang
    • 1
  • Derek McGhee
    • 2
  1. 1.Shanghai University of Political Science and LawShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Social Policy, CriminologyUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations