Differentiating Between Santos and Uribe

  • Gwen Burnyeat
Part of the Studies of the Americas book series (STAM)


This chapter describes a more recent development in the Community’s radical narrative, in which President Juan Manuel Santos is perceived to be ‘the same’ as ex-President Álvaro Uribe, despite different official rhetoric on peace and victims’ rights. It describes how the Community’s four demands have been translated into orders by the Colombian Constitutional Court, leading to an attempt at a presidential apology which was received ambiguously by the Community, and the attitude that Community members have to state reparations programmes. Drawing on conversations with Community members about current topics such as the peace process, it shows how the radical narrative functions as a self-reconfirming framework.


  1. Burnyeat, Gwen (2010). ‘Una barrera a la paz: polarización en el debate colombiano de víctimas’. In Revista Javeriana 768(146): 30–43.Google Scholar
  2. Corte Constitucional (2012). Auto 164/12 Seguimiento al cumplimiento de las órdenes impartidas en la sentencia T-1025 de 2007. [accessed 1 June 2014].
  3. Gómez-Suárez, Andrei (2016). El triunfo del No: La paradoja emocional detrás del plebiscito. Bogotá: Icono Editorial.Google Scholar
  4. Mitchell, Timothy (2006). ‘Society, Economy, and the State Effect’. In Aradhana Sharma and Akhil Gupta (Eds.) The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Tate, Winifred (2007). Counting the Dead: The Culture and Politics of Human Rights Activism in Colombia. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gwen Burnyeat
    • 1
  1. 1.University College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations