Mobile Health pp 443-453 | Cite as

Modeling Opportunities in mHealth Cyber-Physical Systems

  • Wendy Nilsen
  • Emre Ertin
  • Eric B. Hekler
  • Santosh Kumar
  • Insup Lee
  • Rahul Mangharam
  • Misha Pavel
  • James M. Rehg
  • William Riley
  • Daniel E. Rivera
  • Donna Spruijt-Metz
Chapter

Abstract

Cyber-physical systems, with their focus on creating closed-loop systems, have transformed a wide range of areas (e.g., flight systems, industrial plants, robotics, etc.). However, even after a century of health research we still lack dynamic computational models of human health and its interactions with the environment, let alone a full closed-loop cyber-physical system. A major hurdle to developing cyber-physical systems in the medical and health fields has been the lack of high-resolution data on changes in both outcomes and predictive variables in the natural environment. There are many public and private initiatives addressing these measurement issues and the health research community is witnessing rapid progress in this area. Consequently, there is an emerging opportunity to develop cyber-physical systems for mobile health (mHealth). This chapter describes research challenges in developing cyber-physical system models to build effective and safe mHealth interventions. Doing so involves significant advances in modeling of health, biology, and behavior and their interactions with the environment and response of humans to the mHealth interventions.

References

  1. 1.
    L. G. Jaimes, J. Calderon, J. Lopez and A. Raij, “Trends in Mobile Cyber-Physical Systems for health Just-in time interventions,” SoutheastCon 2015, Fort Lauderdale, FL, 2015, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hekler E, Michie S, Rivera DE, Collins LM, Pavel M, Jimison H, Garnett C, Parral S, Spruijt-Metz D. Developing and refining models and theories suitable for digital behavior change interventions. Am J Prev Med.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Science Foundation (2016). Cyber-Physical Systems solicitation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=503286 on July 30, 2016.
  4. 4.
    Stephen D. Patek, Sanjian Chen, Patrick Keith-Hynes, Insup Lee. Distributed Aspects of the Artificial Pancreas, 51st Annual Allerton Conf. on Communication, Control and Computing, 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nahum-Shani I, Hekler E, Spruijt-Metz D. Building Health Behavior Models to Guide the Development of Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions: A Pragmatic Framework. Health Psychol. 2015; 34.Suppl 1209–19.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hekler EB, Klasnja P, Riley WT, et al. Agile science: creating useful products for behavior change in the real world. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2016:1–12.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patrick K, Hekler EB, Estrin D, et al. Rapid rate of technological development and its implications for research on digital health behavior interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2016.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar, S., et al., Mobile Health Technology Evaluation: The mHealth Evidence Workshop. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2013. 45(2): p. 228–236.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hekler EB, Klasnja P, Traver V, Hendriks M. Realizing Effective Behavioral Management of Health: The Metamorphosis of Behavioral Science Methods. IEEE Pulse 2013;4(4):29–34Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, Nilsen W, Allison SM, Mermelstein R. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2011;1(1):53–71.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Klasnja P, Hekler EB, Shiffman S, et al. Micro-randomized trials: An experimental design for developing just-in-time adaptive interventions. Health Psychology. 2016;34(Suppl):1220–1228.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martin CA, Desphande S, Hekler EB, Rivera DE. A system identification approach for improving behavioral interventions based on social cognitive theory. Paper presented at: American Control Conference (ACC)2015; Chicago, IL USA.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liao P, Klasnja P, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Sample size calculations for micro-randomized trials in Mhealth. Statistics in Medicine. 2015;35(12):1944–1971.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spruijt-Metz D, Hekler E, Saranummi N, Intille S, Korhonen I, Nilsen W, Rivera DE, Spring B, Michie S, Asch DA, Sanna A, Salcedo VT, Kukakfa R, Pavel M. Building new computational models to support health behavior change and maintenance: new opportunities in behavioral research. Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2015; 5(3): 335–46.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pavel M, Jimison HB, Korhonen I, Gordon CM, Saranummi N. Behavioral Informatics and Computational Modeling in Support of Proactive Health Management and Care. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on 2015; 62(12): 2763–75.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin CA, Rivera DE, Hekler EB. A decision framework for an adaptive behavioral intervention for physical activity using hybrid model predictive control. Paper presented at: American Control Conference (ACC)2016; Boston, MA USA.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang Z., Pajic M., and Manghara R. Cyber–Physical Modeling of Implantable Cardiac Medical Devices. Proceedings of the IEEE | Vol. 100,No. 1, January 2012, pp 122–137.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eunkyoung Jee, Shaohui Wang, Jeong Ki Kim, Jaewoo Lee, Oleg Sokolsky and Insup Lee, A Safety-Assured Development Approach for Real-Time Pacemaker Software. IEEE Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (RTCSA) 2010.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Insup Lee, Oleg Sokolsky, Sanjian Chen, John Hatcliff, Eunkyoung Jee, BaekGyu Kim, Andrew King, Margaret Mullen-Fortino, Soojin Park, Alexander Roederer, and Krishna Venkatasubramanian, Challenges and Research Directions in Medical Cyber-Physical Systems, in Special Issue on Cyber-Physical Systems, IEEE Proceedings, 100(1), pp. 75–90, Jan 2012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy Nilsen
    • 1
  • Emre Ertin
    • 2
  • Eric B. Hekler
    • 3
  • Santosh Kumar
    • 4
  • Insup Lee
    • 5
  • Rahul Mangharam
    • 5
  • Misha Pavel
    • 6
  • James M. Rehg
    • 7
  • William Riley
    • 8
  • Daniel E. Rivera
    • 9
  • Donna Spruijt-Metz
    • 10
  1. 1.National Science FoundationArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of MemphisMemphisUSA
  5. 5.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  6. 6.Northeastern UniversityBostonUSA
  7. 7.College of ComputingGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  8. 8.National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA
  9. 9.Control Systems Engineering LaboratorySchool for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  10. 10.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations