Advertisement

International Criminal Law as One Response to World Suffering: General Observations and the Case of Darfur

  • Joachim J. SavelsbergEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 67)

Abstract

In the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries some actions that caused mass violence have been redefined from heroic deeds to criminal acts, including war crimes and genocide. This essay outlines dimensions of mass violence in recent history and describes how new institutions such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and Amnesty International have sought to define actions producing mass violence as criminal acts. Special attention and research detail are given to recent events in Darfur, derived in large part from the author’s research on inter-national media content over the course of the Darfur conflict. The author concludes with some cautionary notes about the extent to which this historical interjection of criminal law and criminal sanctions into international conflicts will have lasting effects in future instances of mass violence. To the extent that relevant institutional changes persist, we can be optimistic about being on a path that relieves some kinds of world suffering.

Keywords

Criminal Justice International Criminal Court Rome Statute Transitional Justice Truth Commission 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, J. C. (2004). On the social construction of moral universals: The ‘Holocaust’ from war crime to trauma drama. In J. C. Alexander et al. (Eds.), Cultural trauma and collective identity (pp. 196–263). Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barkan, E. (2013). Justifying atrocities: Contested victims. Lecture at Legal Frames of Memory conference. Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Czarnota, A. (2015). Law as Mnemosyne married with Lethe: Quasi-judicial institutions and collective memories. Paper presented at Contested past, contested present: Social memories and human rights in post-communist Europe conference, Minneapolis, 2015.Google Scholar
  5. Elias, N. (1978). The civilizing process. 1st American ed. Mole Editions. New York: Urizen Books.Google Scholar
  6. Giesen, B. (2004). Triumph or Trauma. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  7. Golden, S. (2013). After atrocity: Community reconstruction in Northern Uganda. University of Minnesota, Doctoral Dissertation.Google Scholar
  8. Goldsmith, J., & Krasner, S. D. (2003). The limits of idealism. Daedalus, 132(1), 47–63.Google Scholar
  9. Hayner, P. B. (2001). Unspeakable truths: Confronting state terror and atrocity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Jo, H. & Simmons, B. (2016). Can the international criminal court deter atrocity? International Organization, 70(3), 443–475.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, E. A., & Monkkonen, E. H. (Eds.). (1996). The civilization of crime: Violence in town and country since the middle ages. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  12. Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, H., & Sikkink, K. (2010). Explaining the deterrence effect of human rights prosecutions for transitional countries. International Studies Quarterly, 54(4), 939–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Landsman, S. (2005). Crimes of the holocaust: The law confronts hard cases, Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levy, D., & Sznaider, N. (2010). Human rights and memory, Essays on Human Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Marrus, M. (2008). The Nuremberg doctors’ trial and the limitations of context. In P. Heberer & J. Matthäus (Eds.), Atrocities on trial (pp. 103–122). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  17. Matsueda, R. L., Kreager, D. A., & Huizinga, D. (2006). Deterring delinquents: A rational choice model of theft and violence. American Sociological Review, 71(1), 95–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McCarthy, B. (2002). New economics of sociological criminology. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mead, G. H. (1918). The psychology of punitive justice. American Journal of Sociology, 23, 577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meierhenrich, J. (2006). Conspiracy in international law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 341–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  22. Neier, A. (2012). The international human rights movement: A history, Human Rights and Crimes against Humanity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nobels, M. (2010). The prosecution of human rights violations. Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Osiel, M. (2014). The demise of international criminal law. Humanity Journal, June 10, 2014 (http://www.humanityjournal.net/blog/the-demise-of-international-criminal-law/)
  25. Pendas, D. O. (2006). The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963–65: Genocide, history and the limits of the law. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pensky, M. (2008). Amnesty on trial: Impunity, accountability, and the norms of international law. Ethics & Global Politics, 1(1–2), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Power, S. (2002). A problem from hell: America and the age of genocide. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
  28. Rummel, R. J. (1994). Death by government. New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Savelsberg, J. J. (2010). Crime and human rights: Criminology of genocide and atrocities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Savelsberg, J. J. (2015). Representing mass violence: Conflicting responses to human rights violations in Darfur. Oakland: University of California Press. (An open access version of the book is available online at: http://www.luminosoa.org/site/books/detail/3/representing-mass-violence/.)
  31. Savelsberg, J. J., & King, R. D. (2011). American memories: Atrocities and the law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. Savelsberg, J. J., & Nyseth Brehm, H. (2015). Global justice, national distinctions: Criminalizing human rights violations in Darfur. American Journal of Sociology, 121(2), 564–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheffer, D. (2012). All the missing souls: A personal history of the war crimes tribunals. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Seekers of Truth and Justice. (2003). The black book (no place or publisher).Google Scholar
  35. Sikkink, K. (2011). The justice cascade: How human rights prosecutions are changing world politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, P. (2008). Punishment and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, K. (2010). Genocide and the Europeans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and errors: Principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28, 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stan, L. (2013). Civil society and post-communist transitional justice. Paper presented at Legal Frames of Memory conference. Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations