Advertisement

International Research Involving Resource-Constrained Countries

  • Arthur L. Caplan
  • Barbara K. Redman
Chapter

Abstract

While there has been an accelerating development of scientific capacity around the globe, in much of the world research ethics review systems are still developing and policies are variable. (Subjects protection regulations for many countries may be found on the US Office of Human Research Protection website). Policies and research ethics frameworks are not yet harmonized, and varied intellectual property and trade laws may limit data transfer.

Keywords

Global research Research capacity Fair benefit 

References

  1. Daley G, Hyun I, Apperley J, Barker R, Benvenisty N, et al. Setting global standards for stem cell research and clinical translation: the 2016 ISSCR Guidelines. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;6:787–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Søreide K, Alderson D, Bergenfelz A, Beynon J, Connor S, et al. Strategies to improve clinical research in surgery through international collaboration. Lancet. 2013;382:1140–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yusuf S, Wittes J. Interpreting geographic variations in results of randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(23):2263–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Additional Suggested Reading

  1. Benatar S, Daibes I, Tomsons S. Inter-philosophies dialogue: creating a paradigm for global health ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2016;26(3):323–346. (Philosophical look at global health ethics is provided.)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Daley G, Hyun I, Apperley J, Barker R, Benvenisty N, et al. Setting global standards for stem cell research and clinical translation: the 2016 ISSCR Guidelines. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;6:787–797. (Stem cell research is an example of self-regulation by an emerging area of science.)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Folayan M, Peterson K, Haire B, Brown B, Audu K, et al. Debating ethics in HIV research: Gaps between policy and practice in Nigeria. Dev World Bioeth. 2015;15(3):214–225. (One developing country addresses gaps between policy and practice in an area of research important to the health of their people.)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pratt B, Lwin K, Zion D, Nosten F, Loff B, Cheah P Exploitation and community engagement: Can community advisory boards successfully assume a role minimizing exploitation in international research? Dev World Bioeth. 2013;15(1):18–26. (Community advisory boards to research projects are expected to provide strong recommendations to make international research fair.)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur L. Caplan
    • 1
  • Barbara K. Redman
    • 1
  1. 1.New York University Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations