Advertisement

Problematising and Reconceptualising ‘Vulnerability’ in the Context of Disablist Violence

  • Ryan ThorneycroftEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The concept vulnerability is largely used in a taken-for-granted manner, whereby people designated as vulnerable are associated with weakness, powerlessness and susceptibility to harm (Furedi 2007). The next logical step, then, is that people termed vulnerable are different and in need of special protection (Brown 2011). As a consequence of these cultural metaphors, certain groups have resisted the externally imposed depiction that they are vulnerable (Gilson 2014). In particular, the term is contentious in disability studies, as some argue it paints disabled people1 as inherently weak, easy targets and dependent (see Quarmby 2008; Roulstone and Sadique 2013; Roulstone et al. 2011; Sherry 2010; Thomas 2011). Vulnerable is thus presented as a dangerous term because calling people vulnerable ghettoises them, confines them and abjects them. And yet paralleling these arguments, another corpus of scholarship embraces vulnerability and places it at the centre of human existence (see Butler 2004; Gilson 2014; Turner 2006). These arguments contend that all humans are vulnerable, and this is evidenced by the fact all humans possess a corporeal fragility, and each has the capacity to affect and be affected by others (Gilson 2014; Turner 2006) (also see Howes, Bartkowiak-Théron and Asquith in this collection for a discussion about the varying terminology surrounding vulnerability).

Keywords

Criminal Justice System Asylum Seeker Disable People Hate Crime Social Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Asquith, N. L. 2015a, A governance of denial: Hate crime in New Zealand and Australia, in N. Hall, A. Corb, P. Giannasi, & J. Grieve (eds), The Routledge international handbook on hate crime. London: Routledge, pp. 174–189.Google Scholar
  2. Asquith, N. L. 2015b, Honour, violence and heteronormativity, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 4(3), pp. 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asquith, N. L., & Fox, C. A. 2016, No place like home: Intrafamilial hate crime against gay men and lesbians, in A. Dwyer, M. Ball, & T. Crofts (eds), Queering criminology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 163–182.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, C. 2012, Understanding the social model of disability: Past, present and future, in N. Watson, A. Roulstone, & C. Thomas (eds), Routledge handbook of disability studies. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 12–29.Google Scholar
  5. Bartkowiak-Théron, I., & Asquith, N. L. 2016, Conceptual divides and practice synergies in law enforcement and public health: Some lessons from policing vulnerability in Australia, Policing & Society. doi:  10.1080/10439463.2016.1216553 Google Scholar
  6. Baynton, D. 2001, Disability and the justification of inequality in American history, in P. K. Longmore & L. Umansky (eds), The new disability history: American perspectives. New York & London: New York University Press, pp. 33–57.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, B. 2012, Listening to shame, TEDTalk, filmed March. Available from https://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_listening_to_shame?language=en(accessed 14 March 2016).
  8. Brown, K. 2011, ‘Vulnerability’: Handle with care, Ethics and Social Welfare, 5(3), pp. 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burghardt, M. 2013, Common frailty, constructed oppression: Tensions and debates on the subject of vulnerability, Disability & Society, 28(4), pp. 556–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butler, J. 1993, Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, J. 2004, Precarious life: The power of mourning and violence. London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Chakraborti, N. 2015a, Re-thinking hate crime: Fresh challenges for policy and practice, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(10), pp. 1738–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chakraborti, N. 2015b, Framing the boundaries of hate crime, in N. Hall, A. Corb, P. Giannasi, & J. Grieve (eds), The Routledge international handbook on hate crime. London: Routledge, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
  14. Chakraborti, N., & Garland, J. 2012, Reconceptualizing hate crime victimization through the lens of vulnerability and ‘difference’, Theoretical Criminology, 16(4), pp. 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cops, D., & Pleysier, S. 2011, ‘Doing gender’ in fear of crime, British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), pp. 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Doherty, G. 2015, Do mates hate? A framing of the theoretical position of mate crime and an assessment of its practical impact, The Journal of Adult Protection, 17(5), pp. 296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furedi, F. 2007, From the narrative of the blitz to the rhetoric of vulnerability, Cultural Sociology, 1(2), pp. 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerstenfeld, P. B. 2013, Hate crimes: Causes, controls and controversies (3e). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Gilson, E. C. 2014, The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Grattet, R., & Jenness, V. 2001, Examining the boundaries of hate crime law: Disabilities and the ‘dilemma of difference’, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 91(3), pp. 653–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iganski, P. 2008, ‘Hate crime’ and the city. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobs, J., & Potter, K. 1998, Hate crimes: Criminal law and identity politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jenness, V., & Grattet, R. 2001, Making Hate a crime: From social movement to law enforcement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Luna, F. 2009, Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2(1), pp. 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Macdonald, S. J. 2015, ‘Community fear and harassment’: Learning difficulties and hate crime incidents in the North-East of England, Disability & Society, 30(3), pp. 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mason, G. 2009, Hate crime laws in Australia: Are they achieving their goals?, Criminal Law Journal, 33(6), pp. 326–340.Google Scholar
  27. Mason-Bish, H. 2015, Beyond the silo: Rethinking hate crime and intersectionality, in N. Hall, A. Corb, P. Giannasi, & J. Grieve (eds), The Routledge international handbook on hate crime. London: Routledge, pp. 24–33.Google Scholar
  28. May, L. 1987, The morality of groups: Collective responsibility, group-based harm and corporate rights. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nyamathi, A. 1998, Vulnerable populations: A continuing nursing focus, Nursing Research, 47(2), pp. 65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliver, M. 1996, Understanding disability: From theory to practice. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. People with Disability Australia. nd, A guide to reporting on disability. Available from http://pwd.org.au/library/guide-to-reporting-disability.html (accessed 8 August 2016).
  32. Perry, B. 2001, In the name of hate: Understanding hate crime. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Perry, J. 2013, The wrong war? Critically examining the ‘fight against disability hate crime’, in A. Roulstone & H. Mason-Bish (eds), Disability, hate crime and violence. London: Routledge, pp. 40–51.Google Scholar
  34. Quarmby, K. 2008, Getting away with murder: Disabled people’s experiences of hate crime in the UK. London: Scope.Google Scholar
  35. Roulstone, A., & Sadique, K. 2013, Vulnerable to misinterpretation: Disabled people, ‘vulnerability’, hate crime and the fight for legal recognition, in A. Roulstone & H. Mason-Bish (eds), Disability, hate crime and violence. London: Routledge, pp. 25–39.Google Scholar
  36. Roulstone, A., Thomas, P., & Balderston, S. 2011, Between hate and vulnerability: Unpacking the British criminal justice system’s construction of disablist hate crime, Disability & Society, 26(3), pp. 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shakespeare, T. 2006, Disability rights and wrongs. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Sherry, M. 2010, Disability hate crimes: Does anyone really hate disabled people?Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Sin, C. H., Hedges, A., Cook, C., Mguni, N., & Comber, N. 2009, Disabled people’s experiences of targeted violence and hostility. Manchester, UK: Equality and Human rights Commission.Google Scholar
  40. Swain, J., French, S., & Cameron, C. 2003, Controversial issues in a disabling society. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thomas, P. 2011, ‘Mate crime’: Ridicule, hostility and targeted attacks against disabled people, Disability & Society, 26(1), pp. 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomas, P. 2013, Hate crime or mate crime? Disablist hostility, contempt and ridicule, in A. Roulstone & H. Mason-Bish (eds), Disability, hate crime and violence. London: Routledge, pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
  43. Turner, B. 2006, Vulnerability and human rights. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Waxman, B. F. 1991, Hatred: The unacknowledged dimension in violence against disabled people, Sexuality and Disability, 9(3), pp. 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Sciences and PsychologyWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations