The Internet Versus Copyright?

  • Trisha Meyer
Chapter
Part of the Information Technology and Global Governance book series (ITGG)

Abstract

This chapter provides theoretical insight into power relations in the field of online copyright enforcement. It studies the history, rationales and discourses of the Internet and copyright. The history of the Internet and copyright teaches us that choices are continually made in the development of a technology or policy. Further, this chapter analyzes the costs and benefits of copyright infringement. Piracy causes loss in the media industries, but benefits other parts of the economy. Digitization and the Internet challenge the creation of artificial scarcity. Finally, the chapter explains the political and legal reality of online copyright enforcement policies. Online copyright enforcement policies are likely to be framed as extensions of existing offline approaches.

Keywords

Media Industry Creative Work Digital Right Management Domain Name System World Intellectual Property Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. February 16, 2012. C-360/10 Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM) vs. Netlog. Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
  2. January 29, 2008. C-275/06 Promusicae vs. Telefónica. Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
  3. July 12, 2011. C-324/09 L’Oréal & Others vs. eBay International & Others. Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
  4. March 27, 2014. C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien vs. Constantin Film Verleih and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft. Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
  5. November 24, 2011. C-70/10 Scarlet Extended vs. Société Belge des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs (SABAM). Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
  6. September 3, 2014. C-201/13 Deckmyn & Vrijheidsfonds vs. Vandersteen, Dupont, Amoras II & WPG Uitgevers België. Court of Justice of the European Union.Google Scholar
  7. Abbate, Janet. 1999. Inventing the internet. London/Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. AGCOM. 2013. Delibera n. 680/13/CONS, Regolamento in materia di tutela del diritto d’autore sulle reti di comunicazione elettronica e procedure attuative ai sensi del decreto legislativo 9 aprile 2003, n. 70. Naples: Italian Communications Regulatory Authority.Google Scholar
  9. Aguiar, Luis, and Bertin Martens. 2013. Digital Music Consumption on the Internet: Evidence from Clickstream Data. Seville: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Aigrain, Philippe. 2012. Sharing: Culture and the Economy in the Internet Age. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ala-Fossi, Marko, Piet Bakker, Hanna-Kaisa Ellonen, Lucy Küng, Stephen Lax, Charo Sádaba, and Richard van der Wurff. 2008. The Impact of the Internet on Business Models in the Media Industries – A Sector-by-Sector Analysis. In The Internet and the Mass Media, ed. Lucy Küng, Robert Picard, and Ruth Towse, 149–169. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Andrejevic, Mark. 2007. iSpy. Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  13. Apple. 2009. Press Info. Changes Coming to the iTunes Store. https://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/06Changes-Coming-to-the-iTunes-Store.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2016.
  14. Beer, David. 2009. Power Through the Algorithm? Participatory Web Cultures and the Technological Unconscious. New Media Society 11(6): 985–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Belgian Parliament. 1994. Wet Betreffende het Auteursrecht en de Naburige Rechten. Brussels: Belgisch Staatsblad.Google Scholar
  16. Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks. How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bently, Lionel, Uma Suthersanen, and Paul Torremans, eds. 2010. Global Copyright: Three Hundred Years Since the Statute of Anne, From 1709 to Cyberspace. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Bettig, Ronald. 1996. Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bigo, Didier. 2006. Security, Exception, Ban and Surveillance. In Theorizing Surveillance. The Panopticon and Beyond, ed. David Lyon, 46–68. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Bing, Jon. 2009. Building Cyberspace: A Brief History of the Internet. In Internet Governance. Infrastructure and Institutions, ed. Bygrave Lee and Jon Bing, 8–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boyle, James. 2003. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66(1/2): 33–74.Google Scholar
  22. Breindl, Yana, and François Briatte. 2010. Digital Network Repertoires and the Contentious Politics of Digital Copyright in France and the European Union. Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Bridy, Annemarie. 2009. Why Pirates (Still) Won’t Behave: Regulating P2P in the Decade After Napster. Rutgers Law Journal 40(3): 565–611.Google Scholar
  24. Brown, Ian, and Christopher Marsden. 2013. Regulating Code: Good Governance and Better Regulation in the Information Age. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Brownsword, Roger. 2008. Rights, Regulation, and the Technological Revolution. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. BSA. 2016. Seizing Opportunity Through License Compliance. BSA Global Software Survey. May 2016. Washington, DC: Business Software Alliance.Google Scholar
  27. Burkitt, Daniel. 2001. Copyrighting Culture – The History and Cultural Specificity of the Western Model of Copyright. Intellectual Property Quarterly 2: 146–186.Google Scholar
  28. Bygrave, Lee, and Terje Michaelsen. 2009. Governors of Internet. In Internet Governance. Infrastructure and Institutions, ed. Lee Bygrave and Jon Bing, 92–125. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Campbell, John, and Matt Carlson. 2002. Panopticon.com: Online Surveillance and the Commodification of Privacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42(2): 586–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cano, Pedro, Eloi Batlle, Ton Kalker, and Jaap Haitsma. 2005. A Review of Audio Fingerprinting. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems 41(3): 271–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Castells, Manuel. 2001. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. ———. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Cooper, Alissa, and David Sohn. 2006. Evaluating DRM: Building a Marketplace for the Convergent World. Washington, DC: Center for Democracy and Technology.Google Scholar
  34. Coudert, Fanny, and Evi Werkers. 2010. In the Aftermath of the Promusicae Case: How to Strike the Balance? International Journal of Law and Information Technology 18(1): 50–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Council of the European Communities. 1986. Council Directive 87/54/EEC of 16 December 1986 on the Legal Protection of Topographies of Semiconductor Products. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 1991. Council Directive 91/250/EEC of 14 May 1991 on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 1992. Council Directive 92/100/EEC of 19 November 1992 on Rental Right and Lending Right and on Certain Rights Related to Copyright in the Field of Intellectual Property. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 1993a. Council Directive 93/83/EEC of 27 September 1993a on the Coordination of Certain Rules Concerning Copyright and Rights Related to Copyright Applicable to Satellite Broadcasting and Cable Retransmission. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  39. ———. 1993b. Council Directive 93/98/EEC of 29 October 1993b Harmonizing the Term of Protection of Copyright and Certain Related Rights. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  40. Davies, Gillian. 2002. Copyright and the Public Interest. 2nd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
  41. Deibert, Ronald. 2008. Access Denied: The Practice and Policy of Global Internet Filtering, the Information Revolution and Global Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. DeNardis, Laura. 2009. Protocol Politics: The Globalization of Internet Governance. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 2010. The Emerging Field of Internet Governance. In Yale Information Society Project Working Paper Series. New Haven: Yale Law School.Google Scholar
  44. ———. 2012. Hidden Levers of Internet Control. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 720–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Dutton, William, and Malcolm Peltu. 2007. The Emerging Internet Governance Mosaic: Connecting the Pieces. Information Polity 12(1–2): 63–81.Google Scholar
  46. Dutton, William, Anna Dopatka, Ginette Law, and Victoria Nash. 2011. Freedom of Connection, Freedom of Expression: The Changing Legal and Regulatory Ecology Shaping the Internet. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  47. Dyer-Witheford, Nick. 2002. E-Capital and the Many-Headed Hydra. In Critical Perspectives on the Internet, ed. Greg Elmer, 129–163. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  48. El País. 2010a. Cable sobre la Polémica por la Ley contra la Piratería. http://elpais.com/elpais/2010a/12/03/actualidad/1291367865_850215.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  49. ———. 2010b. Cable sobre las Presiones para que España Combata la Piratería. http://elpais.com/elpais/2010b/12/03/actualidad/1291367862_850215.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  50. EUIPO. 2016. The Economic Cost of IPR Infringement in the Recorded Music Industry. Alicante: European Union Intellectual Property Office.Google Scholar
  51. European Commission. 2005. COM(2005) 276 final. Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Criminal Measures aimed at Ensuring the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights, and Proposal for Council Framework Decision to Strengthen the Criminal Law Framework to Combat Intellectual Property Offences. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  52. ———. 2009a. COM(2009a) 467 final. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on Enhancing the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Internal Market. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2009b. Creative Content in a European Digital Single Market: Challenges for the Future. A Reflection Document of DG INFSO and DG MARKT. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  54. ———. 2009c. Final Report on the Content Online Platform. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2009d. SEC(2009d) 1103 Final. Commission Staff Working Document. Accompanying Document to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Europe’s Digital Competitiveness Report. Volume 1: i2010—Annual Information Society Report 2009d Benchmarking i2010: Trends and Main Achievements. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 2015a. COM(2016) 288/2. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Online Platforms and the Digital Single Market. Opportunities and Challenges for Europe Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 2015b. IP/15/6261. Commission Takes First Steps to Broaden Access to Online Content and Outlines Its Vision to Modernise EU Copyright Rules. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6261_en.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  58. ———. 2016a. Promoting a Fair, Efficient and Competitive European Copyright-Based Economy in the Digital Single Market (COM(2016a)592 Final). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  59. ———. 2016b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (COM(2016b)593 Final). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  60. European Parliament. 2012. ACTA Before the European Parliament. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20120217BKG38488/html/ACTA-before-the-European-Parliament. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  61. European Parliament & Council. 1996. Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the Legal Protection of Databases. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 2000. Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on Certain Legal Aspects of Information Society Services, in particular Electronic Commerce, in the Internal Market. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  63. ———. 2001a. Directive 2001a/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001a on the Harmonisation of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  64. ———. 2001b. Directive 2001b/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001b on the Resale Right for the Benefit of the Author of an Original Work of Art. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  65. ———. 2002. Decision n. 676/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a Regulatory Framework for Radio Spectrum Policy in the European Community (Radio Spectrum Decision). Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  66. ———. 2004. Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 2006. Directive 2006/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on Rental Right and Lending Right and on Certain Rights Related to Copyright in the Field of Intellectual Property (Codified Version). Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  68. ———. 2009a. Directive 2009a/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009a on the Legal Protection of Computer Programs (Codified Version). Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  69. ———. 2009b. Directive 2009b/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009b amending Directive 2002/22/EC on Universal Service and Users’ Rights relating to Electronic Communications Networks and Services, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the Processing of Personal Data and the Protection of Privacy in the Electronic Communications Sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on Cooperation between National Authorities Responsible for the Enforcement of Consumer Protection Laws (Citizens’ Rights Directive). Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  70. ———. 2009c. Directive 2009c/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009c amending Directives 2002/21/EC on a Common Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications Networks and Services, 2002/19/EC on Access to, and Interconnection of, Electronic Communications Networks and Associated Facilities, and 2002/20/EC on the Authorisation of Electronic Communications Networks and Services (Better Regulation Directive). Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  71. ———. 2009d. Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009d of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009d establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Office. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  72. ———. 2010. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 2011. Directive 2011/77/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 Amending Directive 2006/116/EC on the Term of Protection of Copyright and Certain Related Rights. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  74. ———. 2012. Directive 2012/28/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on Certain Permitted Uses of Orphan Works. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  75. ———. 2014. Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights and Multi-Territorial Licensing of Rights in Musical Works for Online Use in the Internal Market. Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union.Google Scholar
  76. European Union. 2006. Accession to the WIPO Treaties. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/businesses/intellectual_property/l26054_en.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  77. ———. 2011. Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/businesses/intellectual_property/r11013_en.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  78. ———. 2015. Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/information_society/legislative_framework/l24216a_en.htm. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  79. ———. 2016. Regulations, Directives and Other Acts. https://europa.eu/european-union/law/legal-acts_en. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  80. Farrand, Benjamin. 2011. ‘Piracy. It’s a Crime.’ – The Criminalization Process of Digital Copyright Infringement. Neutralidad de la Red y otros Retos para el Futuro de Internet. Actas del VII Congreso Internacional Internet, Derecho y Política, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  81. Feenberg, Andrew. 1999. Questioning Technology. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Fisher, W. 2004. Promises to Keep: Technology, Law, and the Future of Entertainment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Foster, John, and Robert McChesney. 2011. The Internet’s Unholy Marriage to Capitalism. Monthly Review 62(10).Google Scholar
  84. Foucault, Michel. 1980. The Confession of the Flesh. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. Colin Gordon, 194–228. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  85. French Parliament. 2009a. Loi n. 2009a-669 du 12 Juin 2009a favorisant la Diffusion et la Protection de la Création sur Internet. Paris: Journal officiel de la République française.Google Scholar
  86. ———. 2009b. Loi n. 2009b-1311 du 28 Octobre 2009b relative à la Protection Pénale de la Propriété Littéraire et Artistique sur Internet. Paris: Journal officiel de la République française.Google Scholar
  87. Frontier Economics. 2011. Estimating the Global Economic and Social Impacts of Counterfeiting and Piracy. London: Frontier Economics.Google Scholar
  88. Fuchs, Christian. 2009. Information and Communication Technologies and Society: A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of the Internet. European Journal of Communication 24(1): 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. ———. 2013. Societal and Ideological Impacts of Deep Packet Inspection Internet Surveillance. Information, Communication & Society 16: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Fuchs, Christian, and Dwayne Winseck. 2011. Critical Media and Communication Studies Today. A Conversation. tripleC 9(2): 247–271.Google Scholar
  91. Gibson, Johanna. 2007. Knowledge and Other Values – Intellectual Property and the Limitations for Traditional Knowledge. In Emerging Issues in Intellectual Property: Trade, Technology and Market Freedom Essays in Honour of Herchel Smith, ed. Guido Westkamp, 309–318. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  92. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. Power, Property and the State. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 1. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  93. ———. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Vol. 2. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  94. Gillespie, Tarleton. 2007. Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  95. Gomes, Leandro de C.T., Pedro Cano, Emilia Gómez, Madeleine Bonnet, and Eloi Batlle. 2003. Audio Watermarking and Fingerprinting: For Which Applications? Journal of New Music Research 32(1): 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Gordon, Wendy, and Robert Bone. 2000. Copyright. In Encyclopedia of Law & Economics: Volume II, ed. Boudewijn Boukaert and Gerrit de Geest. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  97. Gotzen, Frank, and Marie-Christine Janssens. 2009. Wegwijs in Het Intellectueel Eigendomsrecht. Editie 2009. Brugge: Vanden Broele.Google Scholar
  98. Green, Leila. 2002. Communication, Technology and Society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  99. Hajer, Maarten. 2006. Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning. In Words Matter in Policy and Planning. Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, ed. Margo van den Brink and Tamara Metze, 65–74. Utrecht: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap & Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research.Google Scholar
  100. Halbert, Debora. 1999. Intellectual Property in the Information Age: The Politics of Expanding Property Rights. Westport: Quorum Press.Google Scholar
  101. Handke, Christian. 2010. The Economics of Copyright and Digitisation: A Report on the Literature and the Need for Further Research. London: UK Strategy Advisory Board for Intellectual Property Policy.Google Scholar
  102. Harbers, Hans, ed. 2005. Inside the Politics of Technology: Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Harcourt, Alison. 2008. Introduction. In European Media Governance: The Brussels Dimension, ed. Georgios Terzis, 13–23. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  104. Harhoff, Dietmar. 2009. Challenges Affecting the Use and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. London: UK Intellectual Property Office.Google Scholar
  105. Henten, Anders, and Reza Tadayoni. 2008. The Impact of the Internet on Media Technology, Platforms and Innovation. In The Internet and the Mass Media, ed. Lucy Küng, Robert Picard, and Ruth Towse, 45–64. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Herrington, TyAnna. 2001. Controlling Voices: Intellectual Property, Humanistic Studies, and the Internet. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Hesmondhalgh, David. 2007. Cultural Industries. 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  108. Hetland, Jarle. 2009. Sweden’s Pirate Bay Members Found Guilty. European Voice, April 17. http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2009/04/sweden-s-pirate-bay-members-found-guilty/64641.aspx. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  109. Huygen, Annelies, Paul Rutten, Sanne Huveneers, Sander Limonard, Joost Poort, Jorna Leenheer, Kieja Janssen, Nico van Eijk, and Natali Helberger. 2009. Ups and Down. Economische en Culturele Gevolgen van File Sharing voor Muziek, Film en Games. Delft: Dutch Ministries for Education, Culture and Science, Economic Affairs, and Justice.Google Scholar
  110. ICANN. 2016. Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. Welcome to ICANN!. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/welcome-2012-02-25-en. Accessed 8 Sept 2016.
  111. IFPI. 2012. Digital Music Report 2012. Expanding Choice. Going Global. London: International Federation of the Phonographic Industry.Google Scholar
  112. IPKat. 2014. Super-Breaking News: EU Commission Had Several Serious Doubts About Italian Communication Authority’s Online Copyright Enforcement Regulation Compatibility with Fundamental Rights and EU Law. http://ipkitten.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/super-breaking-news-eu-commission-had.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  113. ITU. 2006. World Summit on the Information Society: About WSIS. http://www.itu.int/wsis/basic/about.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  114. Jessop, Bob. 2009. Cultural Political Economy and Critical Policy Studies. Critical Policy Studies 3(3–4): 336–356.Google Scholar
  115. Jones, Richard. 2005. Entertaining Code: File Sharing, Digital Rights Management Regimes, and Criminological Theories of Compliance. International Review of Law Computers 19(3): 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Küng, Lucy, Nikos Leandros, Robert Picard, Roland Schroeder, and Richard van der Wurff. 2008. The Impact of the Internet on Media Organization Strategies and Structures. In The Internet and the Mass Media, ed. Lucy Küng, Robert Picard, and Ruth Towse, 125–148. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Lash, Scott. 2007. Power After Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation. Theory, Culture & Society 24(3): 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Lessig, Lawrence. 2003. The Future of Ideas. The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. Reprint Edition. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  119. ———. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  120. ———. 2006. Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  121. Lievrouw, Leah. 2012. The Next Decade in Internet Time. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 616–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Linebaugh, Peter, and Marcus Rediker. 2000. The Many-Headed Hydra: The Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  123. Los, Maria. 2006. Looking into the Future: Surveillance, Globalization and the Totalitarian Potential. In Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond, ed. David Lyon, 69–94. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  124. Lyon, David. 2001. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life, Issues in Society. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  125. ———. 2003. Surveillance as Social Sorting: Computer Codes and Mobile Bodies. In Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk and Digital Discrimination, ed. David Lyon, 13–30. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  126. Mansell, Robin. 2012. Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Marsden, Christopher. 2010. Net Neutrality. Towards a Co-regulatory Solution. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Mattelart, Tristan. 2009. Audio-Visual Piracy: Towards a Study of the Underground Networks of Cultural Globalization. Global Media and Communication 5(3): 308–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Mattelart, Armand. 2010. The Globalization of Surveillance. The Origin of the Securitarian Order. Trans. Susan Taponier and James Cohen. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  130. May, Christopher, and Susan Sell. 2005. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Boulder/London: Lynne Riener Publishers.Google Scholar
  131. McChesney, Robert Waterman. 2008. The Political Economy of Media: Enduring Issues, Emerging Dilemmas. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  132. ———. 2013. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  133. McIntyre, T.J., and Colin Scott. 2008. Internet Filtering: Rhetoric, Legitimacy, Accountability and Responsibility. In Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes, ed. R. Brownsword and K. Yeung, 109–124. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  134. Menell, Peter. 2000. Intellectual Property: General Theories. In Encyclopedia of Law & Economics: Volume II, ed. Boudewijn Boukaert and Gerrit de Geest, 129–188. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  135. Metois, Eric. 1999. Audio Watermarking and Applications. http://www.metois.com/Docs/audiowatermark.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2016.
  136. Meyer, Trisha. 2012. Graduated Response in France: The Clash of Copyright and the Internet. Journal of Information Policy 2: 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Meyer, Trisha, and Leo Van Audenhove. 2012. Surveillance and Regulating Code: An Analysis of Graduated Response in France. Surveillance and Society 9(4): 365–377.Google Scholar
  138. Michalis, Maria. 2007. Governing European Communications: From Unification to Coordination. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  139. Mueller, Milton. 2010. Networks and States. The Global Politics of Internet Governance. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. ———. 2011. DPI Technology from the Standpoint of Internet Governance Studies: An Introduction. http://dpi.ischool.syr.edu/Technology_files/WhatisDPI-2.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2016.
  141. Mueller, Milton, and Hadi Asghari. 2012. Deep Packet Inspection and Bandwidth Management: Battles Over BitTorrent in Canada and the United States. Telecommunications Policy 36(6): 462–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Mueller, Milton, Andreas Kuehn, and Stephanie Santoso. 2012. Policing the Network: Using DPI for Copyright Enforcement. Surveillance and Society 9(4): 348–364.Google Scholar
  143. Murdock, Graham. 2011. Political Economies as Moral Economies: Commodities, Gifts, and Public Goods. In The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications, ed. Janet Wasko, Graham Murdock, and Helena Sousa, 13–40. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  144. Mylly, Tuomas. 2009. Intellectual Property and European Economic Constitutional Law: The Trouble with Private Informational Power. Gummurus: Helsinki.Google Scholar
  145. Netanel, Neil. 2008. Copyright’s Paradox. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. NetNames. 2015. Counting the Cost of Counterfeiting. A NetNames Report. London: NetNames.Google Scholar
  147. Oberholzer-Gee, Felix, and Koleman Strumpf. 2010. File Sharing and Copyright. In Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10, ed. Josh Lerner and Scott Stern, 19–55. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  148. OECD. 2009. Piracy of Digital Content. Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.Google Scholar
  149. OECD, and EUIPO. 2016. The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.Google Scholar
  150. OECD Secretary General. 2007. The Economic Impact of Counterfeiting and Piracy. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.Google Scholar
  151. OpenNet Initiative. 2016a. About Filtering. http://opennet.net/about-filtering. Accessed 26 Aug 2016a.
  152. ———. 2016b. About ONI. http://opennet.net/about-oni. Accessed 26 Aug 2016b.
  153. Oudenampsen, Merijn, and Koen Haegens. 2009. De Hydra Is Terug. Het Veelkoppige Monster van de Internetpiraterij. Groene Amsterdammer.Google Scholar
  154. Papathanassopoulos, Stylianos, and Ralph Negrine. 2010. Public Broadcasters in the Digital Age. In Communications Policy. Theories and Issues, ed. Stylianos Papathanassopoulos and Ralph Negrine, 133–147. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  155. Paré, Daniel. 2003. Internet Governance in Transition. In Who Is the Master of This Domain? Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  156. Perry Barlow, John. 1996. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace. Davos: Electronic Frontier Foundation.Google Scholar
  157. Reidenberg, Joel. 1998. Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rules Through Technology. Texas Law Review 73(3): 553–584.Google Scholar
  158. Reyman, Jessica. 2009. The Rhetoric of Intellectual Property: Copyright Law and the Regulation of Digital Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  159. Rogers, Jim. 2013. The Death and Life of the Music Industry in the Digital Age. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  160. Rooke, Richard. 2009. European Media in the Digital Age. Analysis and Approaches. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  161. Searle, Nicola. 2011. Changing Business Models in the Creative Industries: The Cases of Television, Computer Games and Music. London: UK Intellectual Property Office.Google Scholar
  162. Shahin, Jamal. 2006. A European History of the Internet. Science and Public Policy 33(9): 681–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Shapiro, Andrew L. 1999. The Control Revolution: How the Internet Is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know. 1st ed. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  164. Shemtov, Noam. 2007. Circumventing the Idea Expression Dichotomy: The Use of Copyright, Technology and Contract to Deny Public Access to Ideas. In Emerging Issues in Modern Intellectual Property: Trade, Technology and Market Freedom Essays in Honour of Herchel Smith, ed. Guido Westkamp, 88–108. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  165. Solum, Lawrence. 2009. Models of Internet Governance. In Internet Governance. Infrastructure and Institutions, ed. Bygrave Lee and Jon Bing, 48–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Spanish Parliament. 2011. Ley 2/2011, de 4 de marzo, de Economía Sostenible. Madrid: Boletín Oficial del Estado.Google Scholar
  167. ———. 2014. Ley 21/2014, de 4 de noviembre, por la que se modifica el texto refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual aprobado por Real Decreto Legislativo 1/1996, de 12 de abril, y la Ley 1/2000, de 7 de enero, de Enjuiciamiento Civil. Madrid: Boletín Oficial del Estado.Google Scholar
  168. Stalder, Felix. 2002. Opinion. Privacy Is Not the Antidote to Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 1(1): 120–124.Google Scholar
  169. Strangelove, M. 2005. The Empire of Mind. Digital Piracy and the Anti-Capitalist Movement. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  170. Sunder, Madhavi. 2006. IP3. Stanford Law Review 59(2): 257–332.Google Scholar
  171. TERA Consultants. 2010. Building a Digital Economy: The Importance of Saving Jobs in the EU’s Creative Industries. Paris: International Chamber of Commerce/BASCAP.Google Scholar
  172. Tian, YiJun. 2009. Re-thinking Intellectual Property: The Political Economy of Copyright Protection in the Digital Era. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  173. Torremans, Paul. 2004. Copyright as a Human Right. In Copyright and Human Rights, ed. Paul Torremans, 1–20. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  174. UK Parliament. 2010. Digital Economy Act 2010. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  175. UN Working Group on Internet Governance. 2005. Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance. 05.41622. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  176. United States of America. 1790. Constitution of the United States. Champaign: Project Gutenberg.Google Scholar
  177. US Government Accountability Office. 2010. GAO-10-423. Intellectual Property. Observations on Efforts to Quantify the Economic Effects of Counterfeit and Pirated Goods. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
  178. Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2001. Copyrights and Copywrongs. The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  179. Van Asbroeck, Benoit, and Maud Cock. 2012. The Scarlet Case. ISPs Cannot Be Ordered to Introduce General Filters on Their Network to Prevent Copyright Infringement. AmCham Connect, February.Google Scholar
  180. van Peperstraten, Frans. 1999. Samenleving Ter Discussie. Een Inleiding in de Sociale Filosofie. Bussum: Uitgeverij Coutinho.Google Scholar
  181. Waldfogel, Joel. 2012. Copyright Protection, Technological Change, and the Quality of New Products: Evidence from Recorded Music Since Napster. Journal of Law and Economics 55(4): 715–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Weiss, Aaron. 2008. Content Filters. Will ISPs Become the Enforcers of the Web? netWorker 12(1).Google Scholar
  183. Werkers, Evi. 2011. Intermediaries in the Eye of the Copyright Storm. A Comparative Analysis of the Three Strike Approach Within the European Union. ICRI Working Paper Series 4.Google Scholar
  184. Westkamp, Guido. 2007. Changing Mechanisms in Copyright’s Ontology – Structure, Reasoning and the Fate of the Public Domain. In Emerging Issues in Intellectual Property: Trade, Technology and Market Freedom Essays in Honour of Herchel Smith, ed. Guido Westkamp, 78–103. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Winseck, Dwayne. 2011. The Political Economies of Media and the Transformation of the Global Media Industries. In The Political Economies of Media. The Transformation of the Global Media Industries, ed. Dwayne Winseck and Dal Yong Jin, 3–48. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. WIPO. 1996a. Copyright Treaty, WO033EN. Geneva: International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
  187. ———. 1996b. Performances and Phonograms Treaty, WO034EN. Geneva: International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization.Google Scholar
  188. Wittem Group. 2010. European Copyright Code. http://www.copyrightcode.eu/. Accessed 6 Oct 2016.
  189. WTO. 1994. Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Annex 1C of Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. Marrakech: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
  190. X-Rates.com. 2016a. Exchange Rate Average 2008 (Euro, US Dollar). http://www.x-rates.com/average/?from=EUR&to=USD&amount=1.00&year=2008. Accessed 26 Aug 2016a.
  191. ———. 2016b. Exchange Rate Average 2014 (Euro, US Dollar). http://www.x-rates.com/average/?from=EUR&to=USD&amount=1.00&year=2014. Accessed 26 August 2016b.
  192. YouTube. 2016. Content ID. http://www.youtube.com/t/contentid. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
  193. Yu, Peter. 2004. The Escalating Copyright Wars. Hofstra Law Review 32: 907–951.Google Scholar
  194. ———. 2007a. Digital Piracy and the Copyright Response. In The Internet and Governance in Asia. A Critical Reader, ed. Indrajit Banerjee, 340–359. Singapore: Asian Media Information and Communication Centre.Google Scholar
  195. ———. 2007b. International Enclosure, The Regime Complex, and Intellectual Property Schizophrenia. Michigan State Law Review 2007b:1–33.Google Scholar
  196. ———. 2011. Digital Copyright and Confuzzling Rhetoric. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 13: 881–939.Google Scholar
  197. ———. 2016. International Property Rulemaking in the Global Capitalist Economy. In The Intellectual Property Right Domain in Contemporary Capitalism, ed. Birgitte Andersen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  198. Zittrain, Jonathan. 2008. Future of the Internet – And How to Stop It. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trisha Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for European Studies and Vesalius CollegeVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations