COMPLEX NETWORKS 2016 2016: Complex Networks & Their Applications V pp 69-81 | Cite as

Network-Oriented Modeling and Analysis of Dynamics Based on Adaptive Temporal-Causal Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 693)

Abstract

This paper discusses how Network-Oriented Modelling based on adaptive temporal-causal networks can be used to model and analyse dynamics and adaptivity of vari-ous processes. Adaptive temporal-causal network models incorporate a dynamic perspective on causal relations in which the states in the network change over time due to the causal relations, and these causal relations themselves also change over time. It is discussed how modelling and analysis of the dynamics of the behaviour of these network models can be performed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beer, R.D.: On the dynamics of small continuous-time recurrent neural networks. Adaptive Behavior 3(4), 469–509 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brauer, F., Nohel, J.A.: The qualitative theory of ordinary differential equations: an introduction. Courier Corporation (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung, B., Choi, H., Kim, S.: Workflow-enabled internet service delivery for a variety of access networks. In: APNOMS’03 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cottret, L., Jourdan, F.: Graph methods for the investigation of metabolic networks in parasitology. Parasitology 137(9), 13931407 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Fuzzy sets in approximate reasoning, part 2: logical approaches. Fuzzy sets and systems 40(1), 203–244 (1991)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility theory, probability theory and multiple-valued logics: A clarification. Annals of mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 32(1-4), 35–66 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elzas, M.S.: Organizational structures for facilitating process innovation. In: Real Time Control of Large Scale Systems, pp. 151–163. Springer (1985)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Felsen, L.B., Mongiardo, M., Russer, P.: Electromagnetic field representations and computations in complex structures i: Complexity architecture and generalized network formulation. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields 15(1), 93–107 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Felsen, L.B., Mongiardo, M., Russer, P.: Electromagnetic field computation by network methods. Springer Science & Business Media (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gerla, G.: Fuzzy logic: mathematical tools for approximate reasoning, vol. 11. Springer Science & Business Media (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gerstner, W., Kistler, W.M.: Mathematical formulations of hebbian learning. Biological cybernetics 87(5-6), 404–415 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grossberg, S.: On learning and energy-entropy dependence in recurrent and nonrecurrent signed networks. Journal of Statistical Physics 1(2), 319–350 (1969)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hebb, D.O.: The organization of behavior (1949)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirsch, M.W.: Convergent activation dynamics in continuous time networks. Neural Networks 2(5), 331–349 (1989)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hopfield, J.J.: Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 79(8), 2554–2558 (1982)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopfield, J.J.: Neurocomputing: Foundations of research. chap. Neurons with Graded Response Have Collective Computational Properties Like Those of Two-state Neurons, pp. 577–583. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA (1988). URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=65669.104438
  17. 17.
    Laurent, H.: Trait d’analyse, vol.1. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1891). URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/460639
  18. 18.
    Laurent, H.: Trait d’analyse, vol.2. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1893). URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/460639
  19. 19.
    Lotka, A.: Elements of Physical Biology. Williams & Wilkins Company (1925). URL https://books.google.it/books?id=lsPQAAAAMAAJ
  20. 20.
    Naud, A., Le Maitre, D., de Jong, T., Mans, G.F.G., Hugo, W.: (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poincaré, H.: New methods of celestial mechanics, vol. 13. Springer Science & Business Media (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poincar, H.: Mmoire sur les courbes dfinies par une quation diffrentielle (ii). Journal de Mathmatiques Pures et Appliques 8, 251–296 (1882)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Russer, P., Cangellaris, A.C.: Network–oriented modeling, complexity reduction and system identification techniques for electromagnetic systems. In: Proc. 4th Int. Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in the Time-Domain: TLM/FDTD and Related Techniques, pp. 105–122 (2001)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sharpanskykh, A., Treur, J.: Modelling and analysis of social contagion in dynamic networks. Neurocomputing 146, 140–150 (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Treur, J.: Dynamic modeling based on a temporal–causal network modeling approach. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 16, 131–168 (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling: Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer International Publishing (2016). URL https://books.google.it/books?id=LcowDQAAQBAJ
  27. 27.
    Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling and Its Conceptual Foundations, pp. 3–33. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Treur, J.: Verification of temporal-causal network models by mathematical analysis. Vietnam Journal of Computer Science 3(4), 207–221 (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy sets and systems 100, 9–34 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behavioural Informatics GroupVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations