Mathematics of Epidemics on Networks pp 303-326 | Cite as
Non-Markovian epidemics
Abstract
Early studies of non-Markovian epidemics focused on SIR dynamics on fully connected networks, or homogeneously mixing populations, with the infection process being Markovian but with the infectious period taken from a general distribution [8, 278, 292, 293]. These approaches use probability theory arguments and typically focus on characterising the distribution of final epidemic sizes for finite populations, or on the average size in the infinite population limit. Similarly, the quasi-stationary distribution in a stochastic SIS model, again in a fully connected network, has been the subject of many studies [66, 230, 231]. More recently, it has been shown that one can readily apply results from queueing [19] or branching process [233] theory, or use martingales [65] to cast the same questions within a different framework and obtain results more readily.
Keywords
Compartmental Model Infectious Period Test Node Susceptible Node Pairwise ModelReferences
- 8.Ball, F.: A unified approach to the distribution of total size and total area under the trajectory of infectives in epidemic models. Adv. Appl. Probab. 18 (2), 289–310 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ball, F., Britton, T., Neal, P.: On expected durations of birth-death processes, with applications to branching processes and SIS epidemics. J. Appl. Probab. 53 (1), 203–215 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 32.Bauch, C.T., Lloyd-Smith, J.O., Coffee, M.P., Galvani, A.P.: Dynamically modeling SARS and other newly emerging respiratory illnesses: past, present, and future. Epidemiology 16 (6), 791–801 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Cator, E., van de Bovenkamp, R., Van Mieghem, P.: Susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemics on networks with general infection and cure times. Phys. Rev. E 87 (6), 062816 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 65.Clancy, D.: SIR epidemic models with general infectious period distribution. Stat. Probab. Lett. 85, 1–5 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 66.Clancy, D., Mendy, S.T.: Approximating the quasi-stationary distribution of the SIS model for endemic infection. Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 13 (3), 603–618 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 163.Karrer, B., Newman, M.E.J.: Message passing approach for general epidemic models. Phys. Rev. E 82 (1), 016101 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 166.Keeling, M.J.: The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 266 (1421), 859–867 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 168.Keeling, M.J., Rohani, P.: Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 173.Kenah, E., Robins, J.M.: Second look at the spread of epidemics on networks. Phys. Rev. E 76 (3), 036113 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 182.Kiss, I.Z., Röst, G., Vizi, Z.: Generalization of pairwise models to non-Markovian epidemics on networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (7), 078701 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 199.Lloyd, A.: Realistic distributions of infectious periods in epidemic models: changing patterns of persistence and dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 60, 59–71 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 204.Ma, J., Earn, D.J.D.: Generality of the final size formula for an epidemic of a newly invading infectious disease. Bull. Math. Biol. 68 (3), 679–702 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 211.Miller, J.C.: Epidemic size and probability in populations with heterogeneous infectivity and susceptibility. Phys. Rev. E 76 (1), 010101(R) (2007)Google Scholar
- 212.Miller, J.C.: Bounding the size and probability of epidemics on networks. J. Appl. Probab. 45, 498–512 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 216.Miller, J.C.: A note on the derivation of epidemic final sizes. Bull. Math. Biol. 74 (9), 2125–2141 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 230.Nåsell, I.: The quasi-stationary distribution of the closed endemic SIS model. Adv. Appl. Probab. 28 (03), 895–932 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 231.Nåsell, I.: On the quasi-stationary distribution of the stochastic logistic epidemic. Math. Biosci. 156 (1), 21–40 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 233.Neal, P.: Endemic behaviour of SIS epidemics with general infectious period distributions. Adv. Appl. Probab. 46 (1), 241–255 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 234.Newman, M.E.J.: Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys. Rev. E 66 (1), 016128 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 249.Pellis, L., House, T., Keeling, M.J.: Exact and approximate moment closures for non-Markovian network epidemics. J. Theor. Biol. 382, 160–177 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 261.Riley, S., Fraser, C., Donnelly, C.A., Ghani, A.C., Abu-Raddad, L.J., Hedley, A.J., Leung, G.M., Ho, L.M., Lam, T.H., Thach, T.Q., Chau, P., Chan, K.P., Lo, S.V., Leung, P.Y., Tsang, T., Ho, W., Lee, K.H., Lau, E.M.C., Ferguson, N.M., Anderson, R.M.: Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions. Science 300 (5627), 1961–1966 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 270.Röst, G., Vizi, Z., Kiss, I.Z.: Impact of non-Markovian recovery on network epidemics. In: Biomat 2015: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mathematical and Computational Biology. World Scientific, New York (2015)Google Scholar
- 271.Röst, G., Vizi, Z., Kiss, I.Z.: Pairwise approximation for SIR type network epidemics with non-Markovian recovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.02933 (2016)Google Scholar
- 278.Sellke, T.: On the asymptotic distribution of the size of a stochastic epidemic. J. Appl. Probab. 20 (02), 390–394 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 284.Sherborne, N., Blyuss, K.B., Kiss, I.Z.: Dynamics of multi-stage infections on networks. Bull. Math. Biol. 77 (10), 1909–1933 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 292.Startsev, A.N.: On the distribution of the size of an epidemic in a non-Markovian model. Theor. Probab. Appl. 41 (4), 730–740 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 293.Startsev, A.N.: Asymptotic analysis of the general stochastic epidemic with variable infectious periods. J. Appl. Probab. 38 (01), 18–35 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 307.van de Bovenkamp, R., Van Mieghem, P.: Survival time of the susceptible-infected-susceptible infection process on a graph. Phys. Rev. E 92 (3), 032806 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 311.Van Mieghem, P., van de Bovenkamp, R.: Non-Markovian infection spread dramatically alters the susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic threshold in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (10), 108701 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 319.Wallinga, J., Lipsitch, M.: How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 274 (1609), 599–604 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 325.Wearing, H.J., Rohani, P., Keeling, M.J.: Appropriate models for the management of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. 2 (7), 621 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 327.Wilkinson, R.R., Sharkey, K.J.: Message passing and moment closure for susceptible-infected-recovered epidemics on finite networks. Phys. Rev. E 89 (2), 022808-1-022808-6 (2014)Google Scholar
- 328.Wilkinson, R.R., Ball, F.G., Sharkey, K.J.: The relationships between message passing, pairwise, Kermack-McKendrick and stochastic SIR epidemic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.03555 (2016)Google Scholar