Non-Markovian epidemics

  • István Z. Kiss
  • Joel C. Miller
  • Péter L. Simon
Chapter
Part of the Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics book series (IAM, volume 46)

Abstract

Early studies of non-Markovian epidemics focused on SIR dynamics on fully connected networks, or homogeneously mixing populations, with the infection process being Markovian but with the infectious period taken from a general distribution [8, 278, 292, 293]. These approaches use probability theory arguments and typically focus on characterising the distribution of final epidemic sizes for finite populations, or on the average size in the infinite population limit. Similarly, the quasi-stationary distribution in a stochastic SIS model, again in a fully connected network, has been the subject of many studies [66, 230, 231]. More recently, it has been shown that one can readily apply results from queueing [19] or branching process [233] theory, or use martingales [65] to cast the same questions within a different framework and obtain results more readily.

Keywords

Compartmental Model Infectious Period Test Node Susceptible Node Pairwise Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 8.
    Ball, F.: A unified approach to the distribution of total size and total area under the trajectory of infectives in epidemic models. Adv. Appl. Probab. 18 (2), 289–310 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 19.
    Ball, F., Britton, T., Neal, P.: On expected durations of birth-death processes, with applications to branching processes and SIS epidemics. J. Appl. Probab. 53 (1), 203–215 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 32.
    Bauch, C.T., Lloyd-Smith, J.O., Coffee, M.P., Galvani, A.P.: Dynamically modeling SARS and other newly emerging respiratory illnesses: past, present, and future. Epidemiology 16 (6), 791–801 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 61.
    Cator, E., van de Bovenkamp, R., Van Mieghem, P.: Susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemics on networks with general infection and cure times. Phys. Rev. E 87 (6), 062816 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 65.
    Clancy, D.: SIR epidemic models with general infectious period distribution. Stat. Probab. Lett. 85, 1–5 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 66.
    Clancy, D., Mendy, S.T.: Approximating the quasi-stationary distribution of the SIS model for endemic infection. Methodol. Comput. Appl. Probab. 13 (3), 603–618 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 163.
    Karrer, B., Newman, M.E.J.: Message passing approach for general epidemic models. Phys. Rev. E 82 (1), 016101 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 166.
    Keeling, M.J.: The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 266 (1421), 859–867 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 168.
    Keeling, M.J., Rohani, P.: Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)MATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 173.
    Kenah, E., Robins, J.M.: Second look at the spread of epidemics on networks. Phys. Rev. E 76 (3), 036113 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 182.
    Kiss, I.Z., Röst, G., Vizi, Z.: Generalization of pairwise models to non-Markovian epidemics on networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (7), 078701 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 199.
    Lloyd, A.: Realistic distributions of infectious periods in epidemic models: changing patterns of persistence and dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 60, 59–71 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 204.
    Ma, J., Earn, D.J.D.: Generality of the final size formula for an epidemic of a newly invading infectious disease. Bull. Math. Biol. 68 (3), 679–702 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 211.
    Miller, J.C.: Epidemic size and probability in populations with heterogeneous infectivity and susceptibility. Phys. Rev. E 76 (1), 010101(R) (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 212.
    Miller, J.C.: Bounding the size and probability of epidemics on networks. J. Appl. Probab. 45, 498–512 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 216.
    Miller, J.C.: A note on the derivation of epidemic final sizes. Bull. Math. Biol. 74 (9), 2125–2141 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 230.
    Nåsell, I.: The quasi-stationary distribution of the closed endemic SIS model. Adv. Appl. Probab. 28 (03), 895–932 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 231.
    Nåsell, I.: On the quasi-stationary distribution of the stochastic logistic epidemic. Math. Biosci. 156 (1), 21–40 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 233.
    Neal, P.: Endemic behaviour of SIS epidemics with general infectious period distributions. Adv. Appl. Probab. 46 (1), 241–255 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 234.
    Newman, M.E.J.: Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Phys. Rev. E 66 (1), 016128 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 249.
    Pellis, L., House, T., Keeling, M.J.: Exact and approximate moment closures for non-Markovian network epidemics. J. Theor. Biol. 382, 160–177 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 261.
    Riley, S., Fraser, C., Donnelly, C.A., Ghani, A.C., Abu-Raddad, L.J., Hedley, A.J., Leung, G.M., Ho, L.M., Lam, T.H., Thach, T.Q., Chau, P., Chan, K.P., Lo, S.V., Leung, P.Y., Tsang, T., Ho, W., Lee, K.H., Lau, E.M.C., Ferguson, N.M., Anderson, R.M.: Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions. Science 300 (5627), 1961–1966 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 270.
    Röst, G., Vizi, Z., Kiss, I.Z.: Impact of non-Markovian recovery on network epidemics. In: Biomat 2015: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mathematical and Computational Biology. World Scientific, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  24. 271.
    Röst, G., Vizi, Z., Kiss, I.Z.: Pairwise approximation for SIR type network epidemics with non-Markovian recovery. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.02933 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 278.
    Sellke, T.: On the asymptotic distribution of the size of a stochastic epidemic. J. Appl. Probab. 20 (02), 390–394 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 284.
    Sherborne, N., Blyuss, K.B., Kiss, I.Z.: Dynamics of multi-stage infections on networks. Bull. Math. Biol. 77 (10), 1909–1933 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 292.
    Startsev, A.N.: On the distribution of the size of an epidemic in a non-Markovian model. Theor. Probab. Appl. 41 (4), 730–740 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 293.
    Startsev, A.N.: Asymptotic analysis of the general stochastic epidemic with variable infectious periods. J. Appl. Probab. 38 (01), 18–35 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 307.
    van de Bovenkamp, R., Van Mieghem, P.: Survival time of the susceptible-infected-susceptible infection process on a graph. Phys. Rev. E 92 (3), 032806 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 311.
    Van Mieghem, P., van de Bovenkamp, R.: Non-Markovian infection spread dramatically alters the susceptible-infected-susceptible epidemic threshold in networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (10), 108701 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 319.
    Wallinga, J., Lipsitch, M.: How generation intervals shape the relationship between growth rates and reproductive numbers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 274 (1609), 599–604 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 325.
    Wearing, H.J., Rohani, P., Keeling, M.J.: Appropriate models for the management of infectious diseases. PLoS Med. 2 (7), 621 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 327.
    Wilkinson, R.R., Sharkey, K.J.: Message passing and moment closure for susceptible-infected-recovered epidemics on finite networks. Phys. Rev. E 89 (2), 022808-1-022808-6 (2014)Google Scholar
  34. 328.
    Wilkinson, R.R., Ball, F.G., Sharkey, K.J.: The relationships between message passing, pairwise, Kermack-McKendrick and stochastic SIR epidemic models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.03555 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • István Z. Kiss
    • 1
  • Joel C. Miller
    • 2
  • Péter L. Simon
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of SussexFalmer, BrightonUK
  2. 2.Applied MathematicsInstitute for Disease ModelingBellevueUSA
  3. 3.Institute of MathematicsEötvös Loránd UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations