Prosthetic Solutions to Biological Deficiencies: Pink and White Aesthetics

  • Pinhas AdarEmail author


The digital information age has made knowledge plentiful. With just a “click” of a mouse, our patients can take an active role in their own dental health. How wonderful it would be if knowledge were the only requirement needed. Proper processing of newly learned knowledge is needed to form an action plan or the knowledge helps with nothing. Keeping up with the latest products in the dental field is a full-time job in and of itself. These different options change the demands of our patients, making our job of knowing, with a certain accuracy, all of the products as well as the options and possible implications of the dental care that we choose for that particular patient.

Since the mere action of telling a patient what is needed in their particular case is not just “selling” a product, but we are actually asking them to invest in our expertise in the procedure. So we owe it to our patients to know which product is the best for their particular case but also how that product works, what is the preparation design needed for that product and what are the limitations of it. Knowing all of this is necessary to know what is needed to get the best possible result and make for a happy patient and doctor and technician. A treatment plan is anything said prior to doing the treatment. Once the treatment has been completed, everything which is then said, is an excuse. If a dental professional offers a patient a treatment option and does not know how the product will react in that patient’s particular scenario, a disservice is done to all involved.


Smile design Digital dentistry Zirconia implant restoration Monolithic zirconia Hybrid implant screw retained Prettau Zirconia restoration PMMA the blueprint for the final design 


  1. Adar P (2005) Lab talk. Communication: the ultimate in synergy. Insid Dent 1:82–83Google Scholar
  2. Adar P (2014) Incorporating the human touch in restorative outcomes. Insid Dent Technol 4:52–56Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad I (2002) Synaesthetic restorations: a psychological perspective for surpassing aesthetic dentistry. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 14(8):643–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA (2011) Reconstruction of esthetics with a digital approach. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 31(2):185–193Google Scholar
  5. Culp L, McLaren EA (2010) Lithium disilicate: the restorative material of multiple options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 31(9):716–720 722, 724–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gratton DG, Aquilino SA (2004) Interim restorations. Dent Clin N Am 48(2):vii 487–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Adar P (1997) Avoiding patient disappointment with trial veneer utilization. J Esthet Dent 9(6):277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Feeley RT (1995) Cosmetics and the esthetic patient and laboratory communication. Oral Health 85(8):9–12 14PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Haddad HJ, Jakstat HA, Arnetzl G et al (2009) Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality? J Dent 37(Suppl 1):e40–e44 Epub 2009 May 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hatai Y (2008 Winter) Reproducing nature: understanding the composition of natural dentition. Eur J Esthet Dent 3(4):372–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Herrguth M, Wichmann M, Reich S (2005) The aesthetics of all-ceramic veneered and monolithic CAD/CAM crowns. J Oral Rehabil 32(10):747–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ishikawa-Nagai S, Yoshida A, Sakai M, Kristiansen J, DaSilva JD (2009) Clinical evaluation of perceptibility of color differences between natural teeth and all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 37(Suppl 1):e57–e63 Epub 2009 Apr 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Joiner A (2004) Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent 32(Suppl 1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kahng LS (2006) Patient-dentist-technician communication within the dental team: using a colored treatment plan wax-up. J Esthet Restor Dent 18(4):185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Luo XP, Zhang L (2010) Effect of veneering techniques on color and translucency of Y-TZP. J Prosthodont 19(6):465–470 Epub 2010 Jun 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mayekar SM (2001) Shades of a color. Illusion or reality? Dent Clin N Am 45(1):155–172 viiPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Raptis NV, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H (2006) Optical behavior of current ceramic systems. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 26(1):31–41Google Scholar
  12. Reynolds JA, Roberts M (2010) Lithium-disilicate pressed veneers for diastema closure. Inside Dent 6(5):46–52Google Scholar
  13. Santos GC Jr, Boksman LL, Santos MJ (2013) CAD/CAM technology and esthetic dentistry: a case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent 34(10):764 766,768PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tortopidis D, Hatzikyriakos A, Lokoti M, Menees G, Tsiggos N (2007) Evaluation of the relationship between subjects’ perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs. J Esthet Restor Dent 19(3):154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Volpato CA, Monteiro S Jr, de Andrada MC, Fredel MC, Petter CO (2009) Optical influence of the type of illuminant, substrates and thickness of ceramic materials. Dent Mater 25(1):87–93 Epub 2008 Jul 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adar Dental Network, Oral Design Center, AtlantaAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations