Advertisement

Challenging Maxillary Anterior Implant-Supported Restorations: Creating Predictable Outcomes with Zirconia

  • Michael MoscovitchEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The restoration of form and function with dental implants often presents challenges to the most experienced clinician. Each case category has requirements, whether it is a single tooth or a complete arch in need of restoration. The anterior zone, especially the maxilla, can present issues beyond our traditional knowledge of tooth-supported restorations. The high lip line accompanied by irregular bone loss patterns has challenged the practice of implant dentistry since the inception of reliable osseointegrated implants. In the ensuing years, the advancement of implant technology along with regenerative technologies has provided the backbone of improving treatment outcomes. Developments such as 3D radiography, advanced treatment planning software and high-performance ceramics have opened new possibilities in treatment objectives and greater understanding of the requirements for successful management of the complex anterior aesthetic zone. This chapter will explore a series of cases from the single tooth to multi-unit restorations in both the maxilla and mandibular zones. Explanation of the differential treatment choices and subsequent restorative results will be presented along with pertinent supporting evidence.

Keywords

Zirconia Monolithic zirconia Minimally veneered zirconia Digital workflow Prototypes Provisionals Zirconia properties Zirconia clinical performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Hiam Keren, MDT, for the laboratory support in the production of the restorations and Danae Sandoval for the technical assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. The author reported no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M (2010) Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 37:641–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Bartolucci AA, Janowski GM (2012) Influence of low-temperature environmental exposure on the mechanical properties and structural stability of dental zirconia. J Prosthodont 21:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alqahtani F. Full-mouth rehabilitation of severely worn dentition due to soda swishing: A clinical report. J Prosthodont 2013;23:50–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barewal R, Stanford C, Weesner T (2012) A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of three loading protocols on dental implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:945–956PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassetta M, Stefanelli L, Giansanti M, Di Mambro A, Calasso S (2013) Accuracy of a computer-aided implant surgical technique. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 33(3):316–325Google Scholar
  6. Chevalier J, Gremillard L (2009) The tetragonal-monoclinic transformation in zirconia: lessons learned and future trends. J Am Ceram Soc 92:1901–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho S, Schaefer O, Thompson G, Guentsch A (2015) Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 113:310–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen GJ (2012) Indirect restoration use: a changing paradigm. J Am Dent Assoc 143:398–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen M (ed) (2008) Interdisciplinary treatment planning: principles, design, implementation, 1st edn. Quintessence, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ (2007) Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98:389–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dym H (2015) Implant procedures for the general dentist. Dent Clin 53(2):255–528Google Scholar
  12. Flinn BD, deGroot DA, Mancl LA, Raigrodski AJ (2012) Accelerated aging characteristics of three yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline dental materials. J Prosthet Dent 108:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gökçen-Röhlig B, Saruhanoglu A, Cifter ED, Evlioglu G (2010) Applicability of zirconia dental prostheses for metal allergy patients. Int J Prosthodont 23:562–565PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Goodacre C, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan J (2003) Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 90(2):121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guess PC, Att W, Strub JR (2012) Zirconia in fixed implant prosthodontics. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14:633–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Güth JF, Almeida E, Silva JS, Beuer FF, Edelhoff D (2012) Enhancing the predictability of complex rehabilitation with a removable CAD/CAM-fabricated long-term provisional prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 107:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic G, Bornstein M, Dawood A, Quirynen MEAO (2012) Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:1243–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hisbergues M, Vendeville S, Vendeville P (2009) Zirconia: established facts and perspectives for a biomaterial in dental implantology. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 88:519–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janyavula S, Lawson N, Cakir D, Beck P, Ramp LC, Burgess JO (2013) The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel. J Prosthet Dent 109:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A (2004) Quality of dental implants. Int J Prosthodont 17(6):607–641Google Scholar
  21. Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, Ahn JS, Shin SW, Huh JB (2010) A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2:111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kapos T, Evans C (2014) CAD/CAM technology for implant abutments, crowns, and superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(suppl 1):117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karl M, Graef F, Wichmann M, Krafft T (2012) Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 107:232–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelly JR, Denry I (2008) Stabilized zirconia as a structural ceramic: an overview. Dent Mater 24:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keren H, Caro S. Das beste material. Dent Lab. 2009Google Scholar
  26. Klasser GD, Greene CS, Lavigne GJ (2010) Oral appliances and the management of sleep bruxism in adults: a century of clinical applications and search for mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont 23:453–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ko N, Mine A, Egusa H, Shimazu T, Ko R, Nakano T, Yatani H (2014) Allergic reaction to titanium-made fixed dental restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthodont:1–3Google Scholar
  28. Lang N, Berglundh T, Heitz-Mayfield L, Pjetursson B, Salvi G, Sanz M (2004) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:150–154Google Scholar
  29. Larsson C, Wennerberg A (2014) The clinical success of zirconia-based crowns: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 27:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moráguez OD, Belser UC (2010) The use of polytetrafluoroethylene tape for the management of screw access channels in implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 103:189–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moscovitch MS (2015a) Monolithic zirconia fixed prostheses. In: Beumer J, Faulkner R, Shah C, Moy P (eds) Fundamentals of implant dentistry, volume 1: prosthodontic principles. Quintessence Books, Hanover Park, pp 94–101Google Scholar
  32. Moscovitch MS (2015b) A complex implant-supported reconstruction with monolithic-minimally veneered zirconia: a clinical report. Compendium 36(7):496–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Moscovitch MS (2015c) Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 35(3):315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moscovitch MS, Saba S (1996) The use of a provisional restoration in implant dentistry: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11:395–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoğlu E (2010) Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont 19(1):64–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Park JH, Park S, Lee K, Yun KD, Lim HP (2014) Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 111:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pjetursson B, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A (2012) A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(6):22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH (2012) Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 107:170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reyes A, Turkyilmaz I, Prihoda TJ (2015) Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques. J Prosthet Dent 113(4):295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rojas-Vizcaya F (2011) Full zirconia fixed detachable implant-retained restorations manufactured from monolithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in service. J Prosthodont 20:570–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sagirkaya E, Arikan S, Sadik B, Kara C, Karasoy D, Cehreli M (2012) A randomized, prospective, open-ended clinical trial of zirconia fixed partial dentures on teeth and implants: interim results. Int J Prosthodont 25:221–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmitter M, Boemicke W, Stober T (2014) Bruxism in prospective studies of veneered zirconia restorations: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 27:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thalji GN, Cooper LF (2014) Implant-supported fixed dental rehabilitation with monolithic zirconia: a clinical case report. J Esthet Restor Dent 26:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walton TR (2014) Making sense of complication reporting associated with fixed dental prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 27:114–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wismeijer D, Brägger U, Evans C, Kapos T, Kelly JR, Millen C, Wittneben JG, Zembic A, Taylor TD (2014) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding restorative materials and techniques for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wood M, Vermilyea S (2004) A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the committee on research in fixed prosthodontics of the academy of fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 92(5):447–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Restorative SciencesBoston University, Residency Program, McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Private PracticeMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations