Advertisement

Digital Implant Abutment and Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone

  • Nesrine Z. MostafaEmail author
  • Chris Wyatt
  • Jonathan A. Ng
Chapter

Abstract

The use of digital technology has revolutionized implant dentistry by enhancing diagnostics, streamlining treatment planning, increasing the accuracy of implant placement and optimizing the design of abutments and crowns. This chapter describes the digital workflow in terms of the following aspects: (1) digital impression, (2) digital implant treatment planning and (3) digital abutment and crown design and manufacturing. Advances in digital technology are also discussed including (1) current range of materials available for implant abutment fabrication using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and (2) CAD/CAM provisional crown at the time of implant placement.

Keywords

Digital impression Implant abutments Implant crowns CAD/CAM 

References

  1. Aboushelib MN, Salameh Z (2009) Zirconia implant abutment fracture: clinical case reports and precautions for use. Int J Prosthodont 22(6):616–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD (2006) Marginal adaptation of cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs. J Prosthodont 15(3):155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson M, Razzoog ME, Oden A, Hegenbarth EA, Lang BR (1998) Procera: a new way to achieve an all-ceramic crown. Quintessence Int 29(5):285–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204(9):505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bidra AS, Rungruanganunt P (2013) Clinical outcomes of implant abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent 25(3):159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bornstein MM, Al-Nawas B, Kuchler U, Tahmaseb A (2014) Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding contemporary surgical and radiographic techniques in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(Suppl):78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boudrias P, Shoghikian E, Morin E, Hutnik P (2001) Esthetic option for the implant-supported single-tooth restoration – treatment sequence with a ceramic abutment. J Can Dent Assoc 67(9):508–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brawek P, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow—the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17:2119–2125 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G (2011) Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(6):631–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canullo L (2007) Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations. Int J Prosthodont 20(5):489–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carvalho MA, Sotto-Maior BS, Del Bel Cury AA, Pessanha Henriques GE (2014) Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 112:1096–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christensen GJ (2009) Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140(10):1301–1304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craddock MRWRJ (2011) Is the US army dental corps ready for the digital impression? USA Army Med Dep J 1:38–41Google Scholar
  14. El Askary AS (2001) Multifaceted aspects of implant esthetics: the anterior maxilla. Implant Dent 10(3):182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fanning B (2011) CBCT – the justification process, audit and review of the recent literature. J Ir Dent Assoc 57(5):256–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Scharer P (2004) Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 17(3):285–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hinckfuss S, Conrad HJ, Lin L, Lunos S, Seong WJ (2012) Effect of surgical guide design and surgeon‘s experience on the accuracy of implant placement. J Oral Implantol 38(4):311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hinds KF (2014) Intraoral digital impressions to enhance implant esthetics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 35(3 Suppl):25–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hong-Seoka P, Chintala S (2015) Development of high speed and high accuracy 3D dental intra oral scanner. Proc Eng 100:1174–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hwang YC, Park YS, Kim HK, Hong YS, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ (2013) The evaluation of working casts prepared from digital impressions. Oper Dent 38:655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ (2010) Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 38(5):323–330PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Karunagaran S, Markose S, Paprocki G, Wicks R (2014) A systematic approach to definitive planning and designing single and multiple unit implant abutments. J Prosthodont 23:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kerstein RB, Castellucci F, Osorio J (2000) Utilizing computer generated titanium permanent healing. Abutments to promote ideal gingival form and anatomic restorartions on implants. Comendium 21(10):793–802Google Scholar
  24. Kim JS, Raigrodski AJ, Flinn BD, Rubenstein JE, Chung KH, Mancl LA (2013) In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load. J Prosthet Dent 109(4):255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kois JC (2001) Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22(3):199–206 quiz 208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kois JC (2004) Predictable single-tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 25(11):895–896 898, 900 passim; quiz 906–897Google Scholar
  27. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO (2013) Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(1):111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee KB, Park CW, Kim KH, Kwon TY (2008) Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic crowns fabricated with two different CAD/CAM systems. Dent Mater J 27(3):422–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B (1999) Zirconia-TZP and alumina – advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 7(4):113–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mandelaris GA, Vlk SD (2014) Guided implant surgery with placement of a presurgical CAD/CAM patient-specific abutment and provisional in the esthetic zone. Compend Contin Educ Dent 35(7):494–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L (2007) An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 35(11):819–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. May KB, Russell MM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR (1998) Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. J Prosthet Dent 80(4):394–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T et al (2005) Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 1. Implant Dent 14(4):312–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T et al (2006) Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2. Implant Dent 15(2):113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y (2011) CAD/CAM systems available for the fabrication of crown and bridge restorations. Aust Dent J 56(Suppl 1):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakamura K, Kanno T, Milleding P, Ortengren U (2010) Zirconia as a dental implant abutment material: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 23(4):299–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C (2014) A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet Dent 112(3):555–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orentlicher G, Goldsmith D, Abboud M (2012) Computer-guided planning and placement of dental implants. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am 20(1):53–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prestipino V, Ingber A (1993a) Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part I. J Esthet Dent 5(1):29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prestipino V, Ingber A (1993b) Esthetic high-strength implant abutments. Part II. J Esthet Dent 5(2):63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Priest G (2005) Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(9 Suppl 2):22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rohaly J, Hart DP, Brukilacchio TJ (2008) Three-channel camera systems with non-collinear apertures. USA. 7,372,642Google Scholar
  43. Sailer I, Sailer T, Stawarczyk B, Jung RE, Hammerle CH (2009) In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(5):850–858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17(7):1759–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shah K, Holloway JA, Denry IL (2008) Effect of coloring with various metal oxides on the microstructure, color, and flexural strength of 3Y-TZP. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 87(2):329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38(7):553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ (2001) Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 26(4):367–374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. van Noort R (2012) The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 28(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Worthington P, Rubenstein J, Hatcher DC (2010) The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J Am Dent Assoc 141(Suppl 3):19S–24SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yildirim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O, Spiekermann H (2000) Ceramic abutments – a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 20(1):81–91Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nesrine Z. Mostafa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chris Wyatt
    • 1
  • Jonathan A. Ng
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Prosthodontics & Dental Geriatrics, Department of Oral Health SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.VancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations