Implant Provisionalization: The Key to Definitive Aesthetic Success
Developing implant aesthetics can be elusive to many clinicians. Too often we see practitioners jumping from the implant uncovery to the definitive restoration, only to be questioned by themselves, the patient or their referring colleague: ‘why does it not look correct’ or ‘why does it not feel right when I bite?’ There is no doubt that the fabrication of a provisional implant-supported restoration is a costly procedure both in clinical time and additional cost to the patient. However, when it is avoided, for any reason, there often are complications with the final prosthesis. One must think of the provisional restoration as the prototype from which the definitive restoration evolves; ideally the only difference being is the material from which each is fabricated. Aesthetics and function are always established in this relatively inexpensive plastic material prior to the investment of time and effort being put into the definitive restoration.
KeywordsImplant aesthetics Implant provisional Implant temporary Provisionalization Temporization MAC ZAC Gingiva Restoration Implant-abutment interface Acrylic
- Al-Juboori MJ, Bin Abdulrahaman S, Jassan A (2012) Comparison of flapless and conventional flap and the effect on crestal bone resorption during a 12-week healing period. Dent Implantol Updat 23(2):9–16Google Scholar
- Al-Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL (2012) Effect of the platform- switching technique on preservation of peri-implant marginal bone: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27(1):138–145Google Scholar
- Buser D, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Frei M, Belser UC (2013) Long-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5- to 9-year follow-up. J Periodontol 84(11):1517–1527Google Scholar
- Degiudi M, Piattelli A, Shibli JA, Strocchi R, Iezzi G (2009) Bone formation around a dental implant with a platform switching and another with a tissue care connection: a histologic and histomorphometric evaluation in man. Titanium 1(1):8–15Google Scholar
- Karateew ED (2014) Mac and Zac: clinical protocols for predictable implant aesthetics. Dentistry Today 33(9):90–98Google Scholar
- Mangano C, Mangano F, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, La Colla L, Mangano A (2008) Single- tooth Morse taper connection implants after 1 year of functional loading: a multicenter study on 302 patients. Eur J Oral Implatol 1(4):305–315Google Scholar
- Salama H. One abutment/one time. dentalXP.com, May 2011.
- Vela X, Mendez V, Rodriguez X, Segala M, Tarnow DP (2012) Crestal bone changes on platform-switched implants and adjacent teeth when the tooth-implant distance is less than 1.5 mm. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 32(2):149–155Google Scholar