Abstract
This chapter describes two screening instruments developed to provide screening of examinees, regardless of language or cultural differences—hence the term Universal in their titles. Developed by R. Steve McCallum and Bruce Bracken, authors of the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT; Riverside 1998) and the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test-2 (PRO-ED 2016), these assessment tools share the goal of the UNIT instruments, to provide a fair assessment of examinees regardless of language abilities or language of origin. The Universal Multidimensional Abilities Scales (UMAS), designed to screen examinees in several domains related to academic success, is a six subscale rating scale (Cognition, Creativity, Leadership, Literacy, Math, and Science) completed by a teacher who knows the examinee well. The Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test (UNIT-GAT) is a two subtest, group administered screener of cognitive abilities (Analogic Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning). Used together or separately, these instruments efficiently provide information about examinees’ levels of functioning across several domains and can be useful in the process of screening examinees for further assessment to determine eligibility for special services. These instruments share in common the philosophy that it is important to provide a fair assessment, despite cultural and language differences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bar-On, R., & Parker, J. D. A. (2000). BarOn emotional quotient inventory: Youth version. Multi-Health system, Incorporated.
Bracken, B. A., & McCallum, R. S. (1998). Universal nonverbal intelligence test. Chicago, IL: Riverside.
Browarnik., B. (2016). Concurrent and predictive validity of the universal nonverbal intelligence test—Group ability test. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Bryant, J. D. (2006). Selecting at-risk readers in first grade for early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 394–409.
CTB. (1996). Terra Nova comprehensive test of basic skills (5th ed.). Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
Gray, R. G., McCallum, R. S., & Bain, S. (2009). Language-reduced screening for giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(1), 38–64.
Hammill, D. D., Wiederholt, J. L., & Allen, E. A. (2014). TOSCRF: Test of silent contextual reading fluency—second edition examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Hopkins, W. G. (2002). A scale of magnitudes for effect statistics. In A new view of statistics. Retrieved April 2, 2010, from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/effectmag.html
Jordan, K. R., Bain, S. K., McCallum, R. S., & Bell, S. M. (2012). Comparing gifted and non-gifted African American and Euro-American students on cognitive and academic variables using local norms. Journal for Education of the Gifted, 35(3), 241–258. doi:10.1177/0162353212451701
Mather, N., Hammil, D. D., Allen, E. A., & Roberts, R. (2014). Test of silent word reading fluency—Second edition examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
McCallum, R. S., & Bracken, B. A. (2012). Universal multidimensional abilities scales. Austin, TX: Pro ED, Publishing Co.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978–1979a). The anatomy of teacher prediction. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 59–65.
Morine-Dershimer, G. (1978–1979b). How teachers “see” their pupils. Educational Research Quarterly, 3(4), 43–58.
Naglieri, J. A., & Bornstein, B. T. (2003). Intelligence and achievement: Just how correlated are they? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21(3), 244–260.
Park, S. H., Goo, J. M., & Jo, C.-H. (2004). Receiver operating charactering characteristic (ROC) curve: Practical review for radiologists. Korean Journal of Radiology, 5(1), 11–18.
Pfeiffer, S., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted rating scales. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Reynolds, C. R. (2003). Conceptual and technical problems in learning disability diagnosis. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment in children: Intelligence, aptitude, and achievement (2nd ed., pp. 475–497). New York, NY: Guilford.
Sattler, J. M. (2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). LaMesa, CA: Jerome M. Sattler Publisher.
Tennessee Department of Education. (2011). Tennessee comprehensive assessment program. Retrieved from http://www.tn.gov/education/assessment/achievement.shtml
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2011 (130th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bell, S.M. (2017). Two Nonverbal Screeners: The Universal Multidimensional Abilities Scales and the Universal Nonverbal Intelligence Test-Group Abilities Test. In: McCallum, R. (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50602-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50604-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)