Early Mobility, Skin, and Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment
The intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is an important adverse effect due to bed rest in critically ill patients. This kind of complication is a hindrance to the implementation of a fast recovery of patients. It’s mandatory for nurses to implement the ICU-AW prevention through an active collaboration in early patients’ positioning, progressive mobilization, and active collaboration during physiotherapy interventions. The only contraindications to early mobilization are hemodynamic instability, intracranial hypertension, and severe multiple bone injuries. Another major complication related to the bed rest of patients is the development of pressure ulcers (pressure injuries—PIs) in ICU. PIs’ risk assessment using the Braden scale in critical care patients is no longer recommended, since it showed a poor accuracy in predicting PIs, mainly related to the scale lack of ICU-specific risk factors such as MV, hypotension, cardiovascular instability, and ICU-LOS. Even the Cubbin-Jackson scale seems to have important limitations in ICU populations. However, the recent introduction of a new scale called COHMON (conscious level, mobility, hemodynamics, oxygenation, nutrition) index for PIs’ risk assessment seems to be promising.
KeywordsBed rest Critical care Early ambulation Muscle weakness Pressure ulcer Pressure injury Prevention
- 5.Fletcher SN, Kennedy DD, Ghosh IR, Misra VP, Kiff K, Coakley JH, et al. Persistent neuromuscular and neurophysiologic abnormalities in long-term survivors of prolonged critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1012–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000053651.38421.D9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Gosselink R, Bott J, Johnson M, Dean E, Nava S, Norrenberg M, et al. Physiotherapy for adult patients with critical illness: recommendations of the European Respiratory Society and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Task Force on physiotherapy for critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1188–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1026-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Emily Haesler (Ed.). Cambridge Media: Osborne Park; 2014.Google Scholar
- 17.National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP). Announcement of change in terminology from pressure ulcer to pressure injury. 2016. http://www.npuap.org/national-pressure-ulcer-advisory-panel-npuap-announces-a-change-in-terminology-from-pressure-ulcer-to-pressure-injury-and-updates-the-stages-of-pressure-injury/. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
- 19.Rennert R, Golinko M, Yan A, Flattau A, Tomic-Canic M, Brem H. Developing and evaluating outcomes of an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of osteomyelitis in Stage IV pressure ulcers: literature and wound electronic medical record database review. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009;55:42–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Brunel AS, Lamy B, Cyteval C, Perrochia H, Téot L, Masson R, et al. OSTEAR Study Group. Diagnosing pelvic osteomyelitis beneath pressure ulcers in spinal cord injured patients: a prospective study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:267.E1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Pressure ulcers. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs89. Accessed 7 Apr 2017.
- 36.Cobos Vargas A, Garofano Jerez JR, Guardia Mesa MF, Carrasco Muriel C, Lopez Perez F, Gonzalez Ramırez AR, et al. Design and validation of a new rating scale (COMHON Index) to estimate the risk of pressure ulcer in patients attended in critical care units. Connect: The World of Critical Care. Nursing. 2011;8:41.Google Scholar
- 37.Fulbrook P, Anderson A. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72:680–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12825.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar