Machine Learning for In Silico Modeling of Tumor Growth

  • Fleur Jeanquartier
  • Claire Jean-Quartier
  • Max Kotlyar
  • Tomas Tokar
  • Anne-Christin Hauschild
  • Igor Jurisica
  • Andreas Holzinger
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9605)

Abstract

The various interplaying variables of tumor growth remain key questions in cancer research, in particular what makes such a growth malignant and what are possible therapies to stop the growth and prevent re-growth. Given the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease, as well as the steadily growing set of publicly available big data sets, there is an urgent need for approaches to make sense out of these open data sets. Machine learning methods for tumor growth profiles and model validation can be of great help here, particularly, discrete multi-agent approaches.

In this paper we provide an overview of current machine learning approaches used for cancer research with the main focus of highlighting the necessity of in silico tumor growth modeling.

Keywords

Tumor growth Cancer modeling Machine learning Computational biology 

References

  1. 1.
    Kourou, K., Exarchos, T.P., Exarchos, K.P., Karamouzis, M.V., Fotiadis, D.I.: Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13, 8–17 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, D., Osborne, J., Wang, Z., Marias, K.: Computer simulation, visualization, and image processing of cancer data and processes. Cancer Inf. 14(Suppl 4), 105 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tzedakis, G., Tzamali, E., Marias, K., Sakkalis, V.: The importance of neighborhood scheme selection in agent-based tumor growth modeling. Cancer Inf. 14(Suppl 4), 67–81 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Araujo, R.P., McElwain, D.S.: A history of the study of solid tumour growth: the contribution of mathematical modelling. Bull. Math. Biol. 66(5), 1039–1091 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sieburg, H.B.: Physiological studies in silico. Stud. Sci. Complex. 12(2), 321–342 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jordan, M.I., Mitchell, T.M.: Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349(6245), 255–260 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holzinger, A.: Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in-the-loop? Brain Inf. (BRIN) 3(2), 119–131 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holzinger, A., Plass, M., Holzinger, K., Crişan, G.C., Pintea, C.-M., Palade, V.: Towards interactive machine learning (iML): applying ant colony algorithms to solve the traveling salesman problem with the human-in-the-loop approach. In: Buccafurri, F., Holzinger, A., Kieseberg, P., Tjoa, A.M., Weippl, E. (eds.) CD-ARES 2016. LNCS, vol. 9817, pp. 81–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45507-5_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, Z., Butner, J., Kerketta, R., Cristini, V., Deisboeck, T.: Simulating cancer growth with multiscale agent-based modeling. Semin. Cancer Biol. 30, 70–78 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szabó, A., Merks, R.M.: Cellular potts modeling of tumor growth, tumor invasion, and tumor evolution. Front. Oncol. 3, 87 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Von Neumann, J.: The general and logical theory of automata. Cereb. Mech. Behav. 1(41), 1–2 (1951)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neumann, J.V., Burks, A.W.: Theory of self-reproducing automata (1966)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ulam, S.: Some ideas and prospects in biomathematics. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 1(1), 277–292 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.: Support-vector networks. Mach. Learn. 20(3), 273–297 (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (2000). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1
  16. 16.
    Mantas, J.: Electronic health record. Stud. Health Technol. Inf. 65, 250–257 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waugh, D.F.: Protein-protein interactions. Adv. Protein Chem. 9, 325–437 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pawson, T., Nash, P.: Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. Genes Dev. 14, 1027–1047 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Przulj, N., Wigle, D., Jurisica, I.: Functional topology in a network of protein interactions. Bioinformatics 20(3), 340–348 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jeanquartier, F., Jean-Quartier, C., Holzinger, A.: Integrated web visualizations for protein-protein interaction databases. BMC Bioinf. 16, 195 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagoner, J.K.: Occupational carcinogenesis: the two hundred years since percivall pott. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 271(1), 1–4 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trisilowati, Mallet, D.G.: In silico experimental modeling of cancer treatment. ISRN Oncol. 2012, 828701 (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kotlyar, M., Pastrello, C., Pivetta, F., Sardo, A.L., Cumbaa, C., Li, H., Naranian, T., Niu, Y., Ding, Z., Vafaee, F., et al.: In silico prediction of physical protein interactions and characterization of interactome orphans. Nat. Methods 12(1), 79–84 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Snell, E.H., Lauricella, A.M., Potter, S.A., Luft, J.R., Gulde, S.M., Collins, R.J., Franks, G., Malkowski, M.G., Cumbaa, C., Jurisica, I., et al.: Establishing a training set through the visual analysis of crystallization trials. Part II: crystal examples. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D: Biol. Crystallogr. 64(11), 1131–1137 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jeanquartier, F., Jean-Quartier, C., Cemernek, D., Holzinger, A.: In silico modeling for tumor growth visualization. BMC Syst. Biol. 10(1), 1 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jeanquartier, F., Jean-Quartier, C., Schreck, T., Cemernek, D., Holzinger, A.: Integrating open data on cancer in support to tumor growth analysis. In: Renda, M.E., Bursa, M., Holzinger, A., Khuri, S. (eds.) ITBAM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9832, pp. 49–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43949-5_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Edelman, L.B., Eddy, J.A., Price, N.D.: In silico models of cancer. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2(4), 438–459 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Macal, C.M., North, M.J.: Tutorial on agent-based modelling and simulation. J. Simul. 4(3), 151–162 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99(suppl 3), 7280–7287 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Starruß, J., de Back, W., Brusch, L., Deutsch, A.: Morpheus: a user-friendly modeling environment for multiscale and multicellular systems biology. Bioinformatics 30(9), 1331–1332 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Benzekry, S., Lamont, C., Beheshti, A., Tracz, A., Ebos, J.M., Hlatky, L., Hahnfeldt, P.: Classical mathematical models for description and prediction of experimental tumor growth. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10(8), e1003800 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Laird, A.K.: Dynamics of tumour growth. Br. J. Cancer 18, 490–502 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loeb, L.: Tissue growth and tumor growth. J. Cancer Res. 2, 135 (1917)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gocka, E.F., Reed, L.J.: A method of fitting non-symmetric gompertz functions for characterising malignant growth. Int. J. Biomed. Comput. 8, 247–254 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Glazier, F., Glazier, J.A.: Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended potts model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69(13), 2013–2016 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gardner, M.: Mathematical games: the fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new solitaire game “life”. Sci. Am. 223(4), 120–123 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wolfram, S.: Statistical mechanics of cellular automata. Rev. Modern Phys. 55(3), 601 (1983)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Qi, A.S., Zheng, X., Du, C.Y., An, B.S.: A cellular automaton model of cancerous growth. J. Theor. Biol. 161(1), 1–12 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smolle, J., Stettner, H.: Computer simulation of tumour cell invasion by a stochastic growth model. J. Theor. Biol. 160(1), 63–72 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smolle, J.: Cellular automaton simulation of tumour growth-equivocal relationships between simulation parameters and morphologic pattern features. Anal. Cellular Pathol. 17(2), 71–82 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kansal, A.R., Torquato, S., Harsh, G., Chiocca, E., Deisboeck, T.: Simulated brain tumor growth dynamics using a three-dimensional cellular automaton. J. Theor. Biol. 203(4), 367–382 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Patel, A.A., Gawlinski, E.T., Lemieux, S.K., Gatenby, R.A.: A cellular automaton model of early tumor growth and invasion: the effects of native tissue vascularity and increased anaerobic tumor metabolism. J. Theor. Biol. 213(3), 315–331 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Alarcón, T., Byrne, H.M., Maini, P.K.: A cellular automaton model for tumour growth in inhomogeneous environment. J. Theor. Biol. 225(2), 257–274 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gerlee, P., Anderson, A.R.: An evolutionary hybrid cellular automaton model of solid tumour growth. J. Theor. Biol. 246(4), 583–603 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brutovsky, B., Horvath, D., Lisy, V.: Inverse geometric approach for the simulation of close-to-circular growth. The case of multicellular tumor spheroids. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 387(4), 839–850 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chaplain, M., Anderson, A.: Mathematical modelling, simulation and prediction of tumour-induced angiogenesis. Invasion Metastasis 16(4–5), 222–234 (1995)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Anderson, A.R., Chaplain, M.: Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Bull. Math. Biol. 60(5), 857–899 (1998)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Markus, M., Böhm, D., Schmick, M.: Simulation of vessel morphogenesis using cellular automata. Math. Biosci. 156(1), 191–206 (1999)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    de Pillis, L.G., Mallet, D.G., Radunskaya, A.E.: Spatial tumor-immune modeling. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 7(2–3), 159–176 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mallet, D.G., De Pillis, L.G.: A cellular automata model of tumor-immune system interactions. J. Theor. Biol. 239(3), 334–350 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Vidyasagar, M.: Machine learning methods in the computational biology of cancer, vol. 470. The Royal Society (2014)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cruz, J.A., Wishart, D.S.: Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis. Cancer Inf. 2, 59–77 (2006)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Madhukar, N.S., Elemento, O., Pandey, G.: Prediction of genetic interactions using machine learning and network properties. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3, 172 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lisboa, P.J., Vellido Alcacena, A., Tagliaferri, R., Napolitano, F., Ceccarelli, M., Martín Guerrero, J.D., Biganzoli, E.: Data mining in cancer research. IEEE Comput. Intell. Magaz. 5(1), 14–18 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Vellido, A., Biganzoli, E., Lisboa, P.J.: Machine learning in cancer research: implications for personalised medicine. In: ESANN, pp. 55–64 (2008)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Upstill-Goddard, R., Eccles, D., Fliege, J., Collins, A.: Machine learning approaches for the discovery of gene-gene interactions in disease data. Brief. Bioinf. 14(2), 251–260 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Larrañaga, P., Calvo, B., Santana, R., Bielza, C., Galdiano, J., Inza, I., Lozano, J.A., Armañanzas, R., Santafé, G., Pérez, A., et al.: Machine learning in bioinformatics. Brief. Bioinf. 7(1), 86–112 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kourou, K., Exarchos, T.P., Exarchos, K.P., Karamouzis, M.V., Fotiadis, D.I.: Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 13, 8–17 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hu, X., Cammann, H., Meyer, H.A., Miller, K., Jung, K., Stephans, C.: Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer-tools for diagnosis and management. Nat. Rev. Urol. 10, 174–182 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Eckel, S.P., Baumbach, J., Hauschild, A.C.: On the importance of statistics in breath analysis-hope or curse? J. Breath Res. 8(1), 012001 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Morris, M., Greiner, R., Sander, J., Murtha, A., Schmidt, M.: Learning a classification-based glioma growth model using MRI data. J. Comput. 1(7), 21–31 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    González-Vélez, H., Mier, M., Julià-Sapé, M., Arvanitis, T.N., García-Gómez, J.M., Robles, M., Lewis, P.H., Dasmahapatra, S., Dupplaw, D., Peet, A., et al.: Healthagents: distributed multi-agent brain tumor diagnosis and prognosis. Appl. Intell. 30(3), 191–202 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Bussink, J., Lambin, P., Aerts, H.J.: Machine learning methods for quantitative radiomic biomarkers. Sci. Rep. 5, 13087 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kherlopian, A.R., Song, T., Duan, Q., Neimark, M.A., Po, M.J., Gohagan, J.K., Laine, A.F.: A review of imaging techniques for systems biology. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 74 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Buchen, L.: Cancer: missing the mark. Nature 471(7339), 428–432 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wang, J., Zuo, Y., Man, Y., Avital, I., Stojadinovic, A., Liu, M., Yang, X., Varghese, R.S., Tadesse, M.G., Ressom, H.W.: Pathway and network appro-aches for identification of cancer signature markers from omics data. J. Cancer 6(1), 54–65 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chuang, H.Y., Lee, E., Liu, Y.T., Lee, D., Ideker, T.: Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 140 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Liu, N., Liu, X., Zhou, N., Wu, Q., Zhou, L., Li, Q.: Gene expression profiling and bioinformatics analysis of gastric carcinoma. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 96(3), 361–366 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wong, Y.H., Chen, R.H., Chen, B.S.: Core and specific network markers of carcinogenesis from multiple cancer samples. J. Theor. Biol. 362, 17–34 (2014)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sanz-Pamplona, R., Aragüés, R., Driouch, K., Martín, B., Oliva, B., Gil, M., Boluda, S., Fernández, P.L., Martínez, A., Moreno, V., Acebes, J.J., Lidereau, R., Reyal, F., Van de Vijver, M.J., Sierra, A.: Expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress proteins is a candidate marker of brain metastasis in both ErbB-2+ and ErbB-2- primary breast tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 179(2), 564–579 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wang, Y.C., et al.: A network-based biomarker approach for molecular investigation and diagnosis of lung cancer. BMC Med. Genom. 4(1), 2 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Luo, T., Wu, S., Shen, X., Li, L.: Network cluster analysis of protein-protein interaction network identified biomarker for early onset colorectal cancer. Mol. Biol. Rep. 40(12), 6561–6568 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Schramm, S.J., Li, S.S., Jayaswal, V., Fung, D.C.Y., Campain, A.E., Pang, C.N.I., Scolyer, R.A., Yang, Y.H., Mann, G.J., Wilkins, M.R.: Disturbed protein-protein interaction networks in metastatic melanoma are associated with worse prognosis and increased functional mutation burden. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 26(5), 708–722 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zhang, Y., Yang, C., Wang, S., Chen, T., Li, M., Wang, X., Li, D., Wang, K., Ma, J., Wu, S., Zhang, X., Zhu, Y., Wu, J., He, F.: Liveratlas: a unique integrated knowledge database for systems-level research of liver and hepatic disease. Liver Int. Off. J. Int. Assoc. Study Liver 33(8), 1239–1248 (2013)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ahn, J., Yoon, Y., Yeu, Y., Lee, H., Park, S.: Impact of TGF-b on breast cancer from a quantitative proteomic analysis. Comput. Biol. Med. 43(12), 2096–2102 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Oh, J.H., Deasy, J.O.: A literature mining-based approach for identification of cellular pathways associated with chemoresistance in cancer. Brief. Bioinf. 17(3), 468–478 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Majewski, I.J., Bernards, R.: Taming the dragon: genomic biomarkers to individualize the treatment of cancer. Nat. Med. 17(3), 304–312 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Li, A., Walling, J., Ahn, S., Kotliarov, Y., Su, Q., Quezado, M., Oberholtzer, J.C., Park, J., Zenklusen, J.C., Fine, H.A.: Unsupervised analysis of transcriptomic profiles reveals six glioma subtypes. Cancer Res. 69(5), 2091–2099 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ceccarelli, M., Barthel, F.P., Malta, T.M., Sabedot, T.S., Salama, S.R., Murray, B.A., Morozova, O., Newton, Y., Radenbaugh, A., Pagnotta, S.M., et al.: Molecular profiling reveals biologically discrete subsets and pathways of progression in diffuse glioma. Cell 164(3), 550–563 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Lalonde, E., Ishkanian, A.S., Sykes, J., Fraser, M., Ross-Adams, H., Erho, N., Dunning, M.J., Halim, S., Lamb, A.D., Moon, N.C., et al.: Tumour genomic and microenvironmental heterogeneity for integrated prediction of 5-year biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 15(13), 1521–1532 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mungall, C.J., Washington, N.L., Nguyen-Xuan, J., Condit, C., Smedley, D., Köhler, S., Groza, T., Shefchek, K., Hochheiser, H., Robinson, P.N., et al.: Use of model organism and disease databases to support matchmaking for human disease gene discovery. Hum. Mutat. 36(10), 979–984 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Clarke, C., Madden, S.F., Doolan, P., Aherne, S.T., Joyce, H., O’Driscoll, L., Gallagher, W.M., Hennessy, B.T., Moriarty, M., Crown, J., Kennedy, S., Clynes, M.: Correlating transcriptional networks to breast cancer survival: a large-scale coexpression analysis. Carcinogenesis 34(10), 2300–2308 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yang, Y., et al.: Gene co-expression network analysis reveals common system-level properties of prognostic genes across cancer types. Nat. Commun. 5, 262–272 (2014)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Liu, R., Lv, Q.L., Yu, J., Hu, L., Zhang, L.H., Cheng, Y., Zhou, H.H.: Correlating transcriptional networks with pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 151(3), 607–618 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Yeh, H.Y., et al.: Identifying significant genetic regulatory networks in the prostate cancer from microarray data based on transcription factor analysis and conditional independency. BMC Med. Genom. 2(1), 70 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Remo, A., et al.: Systems biology analysis reveals NFAT5 as a novel biomarker and master regulator of inflammatory breast cancer. J. Trans. Med. 13(1), 138 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Akutekwe, A., Seker, H.: Inference of nonlinear gene regulatory networks through optimized ensemble of support vector regression and dynamic Bayesian networks. In: Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference 2015, pp. 8177–8180 (2015)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Jörnsten, R., Abenius, T., Kling, T., Schmidt, L., Johansson, E., Nordling, T.E.M., Nordlander, B., Sander, C., Gennemark, P., Funa, K., Nilsson, B., Lindahl, L., Nelander, S.: Network modeling of the transcriptional effects of copy number aberrations in glioblastoma. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 486 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Shi, X., Zhao, Q., Huang, J., Xie, Y., Ma, S.: Deciphering the associations between gene expression and copy number alteration using a sparse double Laplacian shrinkage approach. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 31(24), 3977–3983 (2015)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Leung, A., Bader, G.D., Reimand, J.: HyperModules: identifying clinically and phenotypically significant network modules with disease mutations for biomarker discovery. Bioinformatics 30(15), 2230–2232 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Wong, S.W., Cercone, N., Jurisica, I.: Comparative network analysis via differential graphlet communities. Proteomics 15(2–3), 608–617 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Leung, M.K., Delong, A., Alipanahi, B., Frey, B.J.: Machine learning in genomic medicine: a review of computational problems and data sets. Proc. IEEE 104(1), 176–197 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Shivade, C., Raghavan, P., Fosler-Lussier, E., Embi, P.J., Elhadad, N., Johnson, S.B., Lai, A.M.: A review of approaches to identifying patient phenotype cohorts using electronic health records. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 21(2), 221–230 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Hochheiser, H., Castine, M., Harris, D., Savova, G., Jacobson, R.S.: An information model for computable cancer phenotypes. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Making 16(1), 121 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Delen, D., Walker, G., Kadam, A.: Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods. Artif. Intell. Med. 34(2), 113–127 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D., Jemal, A.: Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 66(1), 7–30 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Menden, M.P., Iorio, F., Garnett, M., McDermott, U., Benes, C.H., Ballester, P.J., Saez-Rodriguez, J.: Machine learning prediction of cancer cell sensitivity to drugs based on genomic and chemical properties. PLoS one 8(4), e61318 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gupta, S., Tran, T., Luo, W., Phung, D., Kennedy, R.L., Broad, A., Campbell, D., Kipp, D., Singh, M., Khasraw, M., et al.: Machine-learning prediction of cancer survival: a retrospective study using electronic administrative records and a cancer registry. BMJ Open 4(3), e004007 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Zhao, D., Weng, C.: Combining pubmed knowledge and EHR data to develop a weighted bayesian network for pancreatic cancer prediction. J. Biomed. Inf. 44(5), 859–868 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Shanmugasundaram, P., Viswanath, V., Sankar, A., Ravichandiran, V.: Metabolomics: a cancer diagnostic tool. J. Pharm. Res. 5(12), 5210 (2012)Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Handa, H., Usuba, A., Maddula, S., Baumbach, J.I., Mineshita, M., Miyazawa, T.: Exhaled breath analysis for lung cancer detection using ion mobility spectrometry. PloS one 9(12), e114555 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Cairns, R.A., Harris, I.S., Mak, T.W.: Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11(2), 85–95 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    O’Shea, K., Cameron, S.J., Lewis, K.E., Lu, C., Mur, L.A.: Metabolomic-based biomarker discovery for non-invasive lung cancer screening: a case study. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1860(11, Part B), 2682–2687 (2016). Systems Genetics - Deciphering the Complex Disease with a Systems ApproachCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Gaul, D.A., Mezencev, R., Long, T.Q., Jones, C.M., Benigno, B.B., Gray, A., Fernández, F.M., McDonald, J.F.: Highly-accurate metabolomic detection of early-stage ovarian cancer. Sci. Rep. 5, 16531 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Hauschild, A.C., Baumbach, J.I., Baumbach, J.: Integrated statistical learning of metabolic ion mobility spectrometry profiles for pulmonary disease identification. Genet. Mol. Res. 11(3), 2733–2744 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Brunelli, L., Caiola, E., Marabese, M., Broggini, M., Pastorelli, R.: Comparative metabolomics profiling of isogenic KRAS wild type and mutant NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016). doi: 10.1038/srep28398. Nature Publishing Group
  108. 108.
    Bertini, I., Cacciatore, S., Jensen, B.V., Schou, J.V., Johansen, J.S., Kruhøffer, M., Luchinat, C., Nielsen, D.L., Turano, P.: Metabolomic NMR fingerprinting to identify and predict survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 72(1), 356–364 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Wei, S., Liu, L., Zhang, J., Bowers, J., Gowda, G.N., Seeger, H., Fehm, T., Neubauer, H.J., Vogel, U., Clare, S.E., Raftery, D.: Metabolomics approach for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Mol. Oncol. 7(3), 297–307 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Jean-Quartier, C., Jeanquartier, F., Cemernek, D., Holzinger, A.: Tumor growth simulation profiling. In: Renda, M.E., Bursa, M., Holzinger, A., Khuri, S. (eds.) ITBAM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9832, pp. 208–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43949-5_16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Koch, L.: Genetic screen: a network to guide precision cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 504–505 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Kotlyar, M., Fortney, F., Jurisica, I.: Network-based characterization of drug-regulated genes, drug targets, and toxicity. Methods 57(4), 477–485 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Fortney, K., Griesman, G., Kotlyar, M., Pastrello, C., Angeli, M., Tsao, M.S., Jurisica, I.: Prioritizing therapeutics for lung cancer: an integrative meta-analysis of cancer gene signatures and chemogenomic data. PLoS Comp. Biol. 11(3), e1004068 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Sacha, D., Sedlmair, M., Zhang, L., Lee, J.A., Weiskopf, D., North, S., Keim, D.: Human-centered machine learning through interactive visualization: review and open challenges. In: Proceedings of the 24th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Computational Intelligence and Machine Learning (2016)Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Kornhauser, D., Wilensky, U., Rand, W.: Design guidelines for agent based model visualization. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 12(2), 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Savas, S., Geraci, J., Jurisica, I., Liu, G.: A comprehensive catalogue of functional genetic variations in the EGFR pathway: protein-protein interaction analysis reveals novel genes and polymorphisms important for cancer research. Int. J. Cancer 125(6), 1257–1265 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Rodriguez-Brenes, I.A., Komarova, N.L., Wodarz, D.: Tumor growth dynamics: insights into evolutionary processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28(10), 597–604 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Blair, R.H., Trichler, D.L., Gaille, D.P.: Mathematical and statistical modeling in cancer systems biology. Front. Physiol. 3, 227 (2012). doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00227. Frontiers Research Foundation
  119. 119.
    Holzinger, A.: Biomedical Informatics: Discovering Knowledge in Big Data. Springer, New York (2014)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Holzinger, A., Dehmer, M., Jurisica, I.: Knowledge discovery and interactive data mining in bioinformatics - state-of-the-art, future challenges and research directions. BMC Bioinf. 15(Suppl 6), I1 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Sturm, W., Schreck, T., Holzinger, A., Ullrich, T.: Discovering medical knowledge using visual analytics: a survey on methods for systems biology and *-omics data. In: Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine, pp. 71–81. Eurographics Association (2015)Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Turkay, C., Jeanquartier, F., Holzinger, A., Hauser, H.: On computationally-enhanced visual analysis of heterogeneous data and its application in biomedical informatics. In: Holzinger, A., Jurisica, I. (eds.) Interactive Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining in Biomedical Informatics: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges, vol. 8401, pp. 117–140. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Otasek, D., Pastrello, C., Holzinger, A., Jurisica, I.: Visual data mining: effective exploration of the biological universe. In: Holzinger, A., Jurisica, I. (eds.) Interactive Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining in Biomedical Informatics: State-of-the-Art and Future Challenges. LNCS, vol. 8401, pp. 19–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Pastrello, C., Pasini, E., Kotlyar, M., Otasek, D., Wong, S., Sangrar, W., Rahmati, S., Jurisica, I.: Integration, visualization and analysis of human intera-ctome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 445(4), 757–773 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fleur Jeanquartier
    • 1
  • Claire Jean-Quartier
    • 1
  • Max Kotlyar
    • 2
  • Tomas Tokar
    • 2
  • Anne-Christin Hauschild
    • 2
  • Igor Jurisica
    • 2
  • Andreas Holzinger
    • 1
  1. 1.Holzinger Group HCI-KDD, Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and DocumentationMedical University GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Princess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations