Advertisement

National Liberation Movements and the UN: Favour Won and Lost?

  • Stefanie Herr
Chapter
Part of the Global Issues book series (GLOISS)

Abstract

The tension between the right to self-determination and the principle of state sovereignty has important implications for national liberation struggles all around the world. During the 1960s and 1970s, liberation movements came to be widely recognised as legitimate. In later decades, however, this international support waned. Decolonisation had offered a unique window of opportunity: not only did it provide a normative framework that could unite disparate groups from all over the world, it also created additional opportunities for mobilising support and expanding dissidents’ pool of resources. Once this normative framework had disappeared, the movements were no longer able to unite in their struggle. As ‘lone warriors’, they could not generate the same level of support and sovereignty re-emerged as the dominant principle of global order.

Keywords

United Nations Normative Order Geneva Convention Territorial Integrity State Sovereignty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albert, Mathias. 2005. ‘Politik der Weltgesellschaft und Politik der Globalisierung: Überlegungen zur Emergenz von Weltstaatlichkeit’. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, special issue ‘Weltgesellschaft’, 223–8.Google Scholar
  2. Annan, Kofi. 1999. ‘Two Concepts of State Sovereignty’. The Economist, 18 September. Accessed 15 January 2015. http://nbksdbd.tamilnet.com/img/publish/2008/01/TwoconceptsofsovereigntyAnnan.pdf.
  3. Araujo, Father Robert. 2000. ‘Sovereignty, Human Rights, and Self-Determination: The Meaning of International Law’. Fordham International Law Journal 24(5): 1475–532.Google Scholar
  4. Ayoob, Mohammed. 2002. ‘Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty’. International Journal of Human Rights 6(1): 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayefsky, Anne F. 2000. Self-Determination in International Law: Quebec and Lessons Learned: Legal Opinions. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Bhatia, Michael V. 2005. ‘Fighting Words: Naming Terrorists, Bandits, Rebels and Other Violent Actors’. Third World Quarterly 26(1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biersteker, Thomas J. 2002. ‘State, Sovereignty and Territory’. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walther Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 157–76. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biersteker, Thomas J., and Cynthia Weber. 1996. ‘The Social Construction of State Sovereignty’. In State Sovereignty as Social Construct, edited by Thomas J. Biersteker and Cynthia Weber, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilkova, Veronika. 2010. ‘Treat Them as They Deserve!? Three Approaches to Armed Opposition Groups under Current International Law’. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse 4(1): 111–26.Google Scholar
  10. Blin, Arnaud. 2011. ‘Armed Groups and Intra-State Conflicts: The Dawn of a New Era?’ International Review of the Red Cross 93(882): 287–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradley, Mark P. 2010. ‘Decolonialization, the Global South and the Cold War, 1919–1962’. In The Cambridge History of the Cold War, edited by Melvyn P. Leffler and Odd A. Westad, 464–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brock, Lothar. 1999. ‘Normative Integration und kollektive Handlungskompetenz auf internationaler Ebene’. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 6(2): 323–49.Google Scholar
  13. Brownlie, Ian. 1992. Basic Documents on Human Rights. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Carley, Patricia. 1996. Self-Determination: Sovereignty, Territorial Integrity, and the Right to Secession. New York: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  15. Cassese, Antonio. 1995. Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal. Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Chadwick, Elizabeth. 1996. ‘Terrorism and the Law: Historical Contexts, Contemporary Dilemmas, and the End(s) of Democracy’. Crime, Law and Social Change 26(4): 329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chandler, David. 2003. ‘New Rights for Old? Cosmopolitan Citizenship and the Critique of State Sovereignty’. Political Studies 51(2): 332–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crawford, Neta C. 2002. Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cristescu, Aureliu. 1981. ‘The Right to Self-Determination: Historical and Current Development in the Basis of United Nations Instruments’, study by the Special Rapporteur of the Sub-commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. Accessed 2 June 2015. http://www.cetim.ch/en/documents/cristescu-rap-ang.pdf.
  20. Cullen, Anthony. 2010. The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daase, Christopher. 2000. ‘Das Humanitäre Völkerrecht und der Wandel des Krieges’. In Humanitäres Völkerrecht: Politische, rechtliche und strafgerichtliche Dimensionen, edited by Jana Hasse, Erwin Müller, and Patricia Schneider, 161–208. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  22. Dahl, Robert A. 1965. ‘Reflections on Opposition in Western Democracies’. Government and Opposition 1(1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dahm, Georg, Jost Delbrück, and Rüdiger Wolfrum. 2002. Völkerrecht, I(2). 2nd ed. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  24. Dinkel, Jürgen. 2010. ‘“To Grab the Headlines in the World Press”: Die Afroasiatische Konferenz in Bandung (1955) und die ersten blockfreien Konferenzen als Medienereignisse’. Zeitgeschichte-online. Accessed 27 May 2015. http://www.zeitgeschichte-online.de/thema/grab-headlines-world-press.
  25. Doyle, Michael W. 1986. Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Draper, G. I. A. D. 1979. ‘Wars of National Liberation and War Criminality’. In Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict, edited by Michael Howard, 135–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Eckel, Jan. 2010. ‘Human Rights and Decolonization: New Perspectives and Open Questions’. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1(1): 111–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eriksen, Tore L. 2000. Norway and National Liberation in Southern Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Africainstitutet.Google Scholar
  29. Faundez, Julio. 1989. ‘International Law and Wars of National Liberation: Use of Force and Intervention’. African Journal of International and Comparative Law 1(1): 85–9.Google Scholar
  30. Finnemore, Martha. 1996. ‘Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention’. In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein, 153–85. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fisch, Jörg. 2010. Das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker: Die Domestizierung einer Illusion. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  32. Friedlander, Robert A. 1981. ‘Terrorism and National Liberation Movements: Can Rights Derive from Wrongs’. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 13(2): 281–9.Google Scholar
  33. Golan, Galia. 1988. The Soviet Union and National Liberation Movements in the Third World. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  34. Götze, Andreas. 2002. Fragen der Anwendbarkeit des humanitären Völkerrechts unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der sogenannten Nationalen Befreiungskriege. European University Studies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. Groves, Zoe. 2013. ‘Transnational Networks and Regional Solidarity: The Case of the Central African Federation, 1953–1963’. African Studies 72(2): 155–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gurney, Christabel. 2008. ‘In the Heart of the Beast: The British Anti-Apartheid Movement, 1959–1994’. In The Road to Democracy in South Africa, iii: International Solidarity, edited by South African Democracy Education Trust, 255–352. Pretoria: Unisa Press.Google Scholar
  37. Halberstam, Malvina. 2003. ‘The Evolution of the United Nations Position on Terrorism: From Exempting National Liberation Movements to Criminalizing Terrorism Wherever and by Whomever Committed’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 41(3): 573–84.Google Scholar
  38. Hannum, Hurst. 2011. Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Self-Determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  39. Heintze, Hans-Joachim. 1994. Selbstbestimmungsrecht und Minderheitenrechte im Völkerrecht: Herausforderungen an den globalen und regionalen Menschenrechtsschutz. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  40. Heinze, Robert. 2010. ‘“It recharged our Batteries”: Medien in der Dekolonisierung Afrikas’. Zeitgeschichte-online. Accessed 27 May 2015. http://www.zeitgeschichte-online.de/thema/it-recharged-our-batteries.
  41. Heraclides, Alexis. 1990. ‘Secessionist Minorities and External Involvement’. International Organization 44(3): 341–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hettiarachchi, Trevona. 2007. ‘Self-Determination, National Liberation Movements and the Use of Force’. MJur thesis, Durham University. Accessed 22 May 2013. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/2360/.
  43. Higgins, Noelle. 2009. ‘The Regulation of Armed Non-State Actors: Promoting the Application of the Laws of War to Conflicts Involving National Liberation Movements’. Human Rights Brief 17(1): 12–8.Google Scholar
  44. Hveem, Helge, and Peter Willets. 1973. ‘The Practice of Non-Alignment: On the Present and the Future of an International Movement’. In Horizons of African Diplomacy, edited by Yashpal Tandon and Dilshad Chandarana, 63–90. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
  45. Jackson, Robert. 1993. ‘The Weight of Ideas in Decolonization: Normative Change in International Relations’. In Ideas and Foreign Policy Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, edited by Judith Goldstein and Robert Keohane, 111–38. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Kaculevski, Zage. 2006. Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker und Minderheitenschutz: Eine Fallstudie zur FYROM. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  47. Kalter, Christoph. 2011. Die Entdeckung der Dritten Welt: Dekolonisierung und neue radikale Linke in Frankreich. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  48. Karmon, Ely. 2005. Coalitions between Terrorist Organizations: Revolutionaries, Nationalists and Islamists. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  49. Manghezi, Nadja. 2009. The Maputo Connection: The ANC in the World of Frelimo. Auckland Park: Jacana.Google Scholar
  50. Marshall, Monty G., and Ted R. Gurr. 2005. Peace and Conflict 2005: A Global Survey of Armed Conflicts, Self-Determination Movements, and Democracy. College Park: Center for International Development and Conflict Management University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  51. Metelits, Claire. 2009. Inside Insurgency: Violence, Civilians, and Revolutionary Group Behavior. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meyer, Karl E. 1991. ‘Editorial Notebook; Woodrow Wilson’s Dynamite’. The New York Times, 14 August. Accessed 15 January 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/14/opinion/editorial-notebook-woodrow-wilson-s-dynamite.html.
  53. Morgenstierne, Christopher M. 2003. Denmark and National Liberation in Southern Africa: A Flexible Response. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
  54. Müller, Johann A. 2012. ‘The Inevitable Pipeline into Exile’: Botswana’s Role in the Namibian Liberation Struggle. Basle: Basler Afrika Bibliographien.Google Scholar
  55. Nadarajah, Suthaharan, and Luxshi Vimalarajah. 2008. The Politics of Transformation: The LTTE and the 2002–2006 Peace Process in Sri Lanka. Berghof Transitions Series 4. Berlin: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  56. Ndlovu, Sifiso M. 2004. ‘The ANC’s Diplomacy and International Relations’. In The Road to Democracy in South Africa: 1970–1980, ii, edited by South African Democracy Education Trust, 615–68. Pretoria: Unisa Press.Google Scholar
  57. Olalia, Edre U. 2002. The Status in International Law of National Liberation Movements and Their Use of Armed Force. Utrecht: International Association of People’s Lawyers.Google Scholar
  58. Oloka-Onyango, Joe. 1999. ‘Heretical Reflections on the Right to Self-Determination: Prospects and Problems for a Democratic Global Future in the New Millennium’. American University International Law Review 15(1): 151–208.Google Scholar
  59. Oppenheim, Lassa. 1905. International Law: A Treatise. i, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Paech, Norman, and Gerhard Stuby. 1994. Machtpolitik und Völkerrecht in den internationalen Beziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  61. Pangalangan, Raul C., and Elizabeth H. Aguiling. 1983. ‘The Privileged Status of National Liberation Movements under International Law’. Philippine Law Journal 58(1): 44–65.Google Scholar
  62. Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Policzer, Pablo. 2005. ‘Neither Terrorists nor Freedom Fighters’. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference, Honolulu, 5 March. Accessed 10 June 2008. http://www.armedgroups.org/sites/armedgroups.org/files/AGP_Working_Paper_5_-_Policzer__March_05_.pdf.
  64. Quane, Helen. 1998. ‘The United Nations and the Evolving Right to Self-Determination’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 47(3): 537–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Raič, David. 2002. Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination. The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  66. Reddy, Enuga S. 2008. ‘The United Nations and the Struggle for Liberation in South Africa’. In The Road to Democracy in South Africa, iii: International Solidarity, edited by South African Democracy Education Trust, 41–140. Pretoria: Unisa Press.Google Scholar
  67. Reno, Wiliam. 2011. Warfare in Independent Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Roberts, Adam. 1999. ‘Beyond the Flawed Principle of National Self-Determination’. In People, Nation and State: The Meaning of Ethnicity and Nationalism, edited by Edward Mortimer, 77–106. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  69. Roberts, Adam. 2003. ‘Order/Justice Issues at the United Nations’. In Order and Justice in International Relations, edited by Rosemary Foot, John Gaddis, and Andrew Hurrell, 49–79. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Roepstorff, Kristina. 2012. The Politics of Self-Determination: Beyond the Decolonialization Process. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  71. Salehyan, Idean, Kristian S. Gleditsch, and David E. Cunningham. 2011. ‘Explaining External Support for Insurgent Groups’. International Organization 65(4): 709–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Santos, Aurora A. E. 2012. ‘The Role of the Decolonization Committee of the United Nations Organization in the Struggle against Portuguese Colonialism in Africa: 1961–1974’. Journal of Pan African Studies 4(10): 248–60.Google Scholar
  73. Sassòli, Marco. 2002. ‘Collective Security Operations and IHL’. In Relevance of International Humanitarian Law to Non-State Actors, edited by College of Europe, 77–100. Proceedings of the Bruges Colloquium 27, 25–26 October.Google Scholar
  74. Schaller, Christian. 2009. Sezession und Anerkennung: Völkerrechtliche Überlegungen zum Umgang mit territorialen Abspaltungsprozessen. SWP-Studie 33. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  75. Schlichte, Klaus. 2004. ‘Staatlichkeit als Ideologie: Zur politischen Soziologie der Weltgesellschaft’. In Ideologien in der Weltpolitik, edited by Klaus-Gerd Giesen, 149–66. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sellström, Tor. 2002. Sweden and National Liberation in Southern Africa: Solidarity and Assistance. Uppsala: Nordiska Africainstitutet.Google Scholar
  77. Senghaas, Dieter. 2003. ‘Die Konstitution der Welt: Eine Analyse in friedenspolitischer Absicht’. Leviathan 31(1): 117–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shaw, Malcom. 1983. ‘The International Status of National Liberation Movements’. Liverpool Law Review 5(1): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shigwedha, Vilho A. 2014. ‘The Relationship between UNITA and SWAPO: Allies and Adversaries’. Journal of Southern African Studies 40(6): 1275–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Soiri, Iina. 1999. Finland and National Liberation in Southern Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Africainstitutet.Google Scholar
  81. Sorum, Paul C. 2009. Intellectuals and Decolonization in France. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  82. Stokke, Olav. 2009. The UN and Development: From Aid to Cooperation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Strydom, Hennie. 2007. ‘The Non-Aligned Movement and the Reform of International Relations’. In Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, xi, edited by Armin von Bogdandy and Rüdiger Wolfrum, 1–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  84. Talbott, Strobe. 2000. ‘Self-Determination in an Interdependent World’. Foreign Policy 118: 152–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tan, Lena. 2015. ‘Rethinking the Role of Ideas and Norms in Twentieth Century Decolonization: Constructing Metropolitan British Identities and Responding to Indian Nationalism (1929–1935)’. International Relations 29(2): 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Thürer, Daniel, and Thomas Burri. 2008. ‘Self-Determination’. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, edited by Rüdiger Wolfrum. Accessed 7 January 2015. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e873.
  87. Tomuschat, Christian. 1974. ‘Die Befreiungsbewegungen in den Vereinten Nationen’. Vereinte Nationen 22(3): 65–73.Google Scholar
  88. Travers, Patrick J. 1976. ‘The Legal Effect of United Nations Action in Support of the Palestine Liberation Organization and the National Liberation Movements in Africa’. Harvard International Law Journal 17(3): 561–80.Google Scholar
  89. Tyner, Richard J. 1978. ‘Wars of National Liberation in Africa and Palestine: Self-Determination for Peoples or for Territories?’. Yale Studies in World Public Order 5(1): 234–91.Google Scholar
  90. United Nations. n.d.a. ‘United Nations and Decolonization’. Accessed 30 April 2015. http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/.
  91. United Nations. n.d.b. ‘Committee of 24 (Special Committee on Decolonization)’. Accessed 12 May 2015. http://www.un.org/en/decolonization/specialcommittee.shtml.
  92. Van Ness, Peter. 1970. Revolution and Chinese Foreign Policy: Peking’s Support for Wars of National Liberation. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  93. Weller, Marc. 2008a. Escaping the Self-Determination Trap. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  94. Weller, Marc. 2008b. ‘Why the Legal Rules on Self-Determination Do Not Resolve Self-Determination Disputes’. In Settling Self-Determination Disputes: Complex Power-Sharing in Theory and Practice, edited by Marc Weller and Barbara Metzger, 17–47. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Werner, Wouter G., and Jaap de Wilde. 2001. ‘The Endurance of Sovereignty’. European Journal of International Relations 7(3): 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Williams, Paul R., and Francesca Jannotti Pecci. 2004. ‘Earned Sovereignty: Bridging the Gap between Sovereignty and Self-Determination’. Stanford Journal of International Law 40: 1–40.Google Scholar
  97. Young, Iris M. 2004. ‘Two Concepts of Self-Determination’. In Ethnicity, Nationalism, and Minority Rights, edited by Stephen May, Tariq Modood, and Judith Squires, 176–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Peace Research Institute Frankfurt (PRIF)Frankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations