Collaboration Tools for Virtual Teams in Terms of the SECI Model

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 544)

Abstract

Nowadays, to participate in a team activity or to collaborate with somebody does not require a physical presence. Virtual settings connect individuals across space and time; allow their real-time communication and collaboration across the globe. It allows formation of virtual teams enabled by the information and communication technology (ICT). Such teams accomplish various functions in work, education and private life. Compared to local teams of physically present individuals, the collaboration in virtual environments requires intensive motivation of the team members, extensive support by their team leader and appropriate technology.

At the same time, no ICT tool is equally suitable for each and every activity. This paper aims to provide analysis of various ICT tools, to disclose their potential to contribute to team’s quality communication and to reduce drawbacks caused by impersonal environment. Our aim is to optimize the composition of the ICT supporting infrastructure in order to form successful and effective collaboration.

Keywords

Knowledge management Collaboration Virtual teams ICT SECI model 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the School of Management (Vysoká škola manažmentu).

References

  1. 1.
    Riemer, K., Frößler, F., Klein, S.: Real time communication-modes of use in distributed teams. In: European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 286–297. AIS, Geneva (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sarker, S., Sahay, S.: Information systems development by US-Norwegian virtual teams: implications of time and space. In: 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-35í02), 10 p. IEEE Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, F., Sager, J.: Train to work effectively in virtual environments: a framework of virtual team competency. In: AMCIS 2007, paper 104, pp. 1–11. AIS, Keystone (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klitmøller, A., Lauring, J.: When global virtual teams share knowledge: media richness, cultural difference and language commonality. J. World Bus. 48(3), 398–406 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whittaker, S., Bellotti, V., Gwizdka, J.: Email in personal information management. Commun. ACM 49(1), 68–73 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cios, K.J., Pedrycz, W., Swiniarski, R.W.: Data mining and knowledge discovery. In: Cios, K.J., Pedrycz, W., Swiniarski, R.W. (eds.) Data Mining Methods for Knowledge Discovery. Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 458, pp. 1–26. Springer, New York (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strong, D.M., Lee, Y.W., Wang, R.Y.: Data quality in context: a new study reveals businesses are defining data quality with the consumer in mind. Commun. ACM 40(5), 103–110 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P.: From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI Mag. 17(3), 37–54 (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits. Commun. AIS 1(2es), 1–37 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meso, P., Smith, R.: A resource-based view of organizational knowledge management systems. J. Knowl. Manage. 4(3), 224–234 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maier, R., Hädrich, T.: Knowledge management systems. In: Schwartz, D.G. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Knowledge Management, pp. 779–790. Idea Group Inc., Hershey (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: knowledge management and knowledge management systems: conceptual foundations and research issues. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 25(1), 107–136 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huber, G.P.: Transfer of knowledge in knowledge management systems: unexplored issues and suggested studies. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 10(2), 72–79 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malhotra, Y.: Why knowledge management systems fail: enablers and constraints of knowledge management in human enterprises. In: Malhotra, Y. (ed.) Handbook on Knowledge Management. International Handbook on Information Systems Series, pp. 577–599. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Leary, D.E.: Guest editor’s introduction: knowledge-management systems: converting and connecting. IEEE Intell. Syst. 3, 30–33 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ou, C.X.J., Davison, R.M.: Interactive or interruptive? Instant messaging at work. Decis. Support Syst. 52(1), 61–72 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huysman, M., De Wit, D.: Practices of managing knowledge sharing: towards a second wave of knowledge management. Knowl. Proc. Manage. 11(2), 81–92 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raman, M., Ryan, T., Olfman, L.: Designing knowledge management systems for teaching and learning with wiki technology. J. Inf. Syst. Edu. 16(3), 311–320 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johansen, R.: Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. The Free Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson-Lenz, P., Johnson-Lenz, T.: Groupware for a Small Planet. In: Lloyd, P. (ed.) Groupware in the 21st Century: Computer Supported Cooperative Working Toward the Millennium, pp. 269–284. Greenwood Publishing Group Inc., Westport (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Johnson-Lenz, P., Johnson-Lenz, T.: Groupware: the process and impacts of design choices. In: Kerr, E.B., Hiltz, S.R. (eds.) Computer-Mediated Communication Systems: Status and Evaluation. Academic Press, Orlando (1982)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J., Rein, G.: Groupware: some issues and experiences. Commun. ACM 34(1), 39–58 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Greer, B.M., Luethge, D.J., Robinson, G.: Utilizing virtual technology as a tool to enhance the workforce diversity learning. In: Scott, C.L., Sims, J.D. (eds.) Developing Workforce Diversity Programs, Curriculum, and Degrees in Higher Education. AHEPD, pp. 258–279. IGI Global, Oklahoma (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nonaka, I., Konno, N.: The concept of “Ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif. Manage. Rev. 40(3), 40–54 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N.: SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Plan. 33(1), 5–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R.: The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowl. Manage. Res. Pract. 1(1), 2–10 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stawnicza, O.: Information and communication technologies – creating oneness in globally distributed IT project teams. Proc. Technol. 16, 1057–1064 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Potter, R.E., Balthazard, P.A.: Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 56(4), 423–443 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mowshowitz, A.: Virtual organization. Commun. ACM 40(9), 30–37 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jang, C.Y., Steinfield, C., Pfaff, B.: Supporting Awareness among Virtual-Teams in a Web-Based Collaborative System: The Team SCOPE System. CSCW, Philadelphia (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jackson, P.J.: Organizational change and virtual teams: strategic and operational integration. Inf. Syst. J. 9, 313–332 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hackman, J.R.: The design of work teams. In: Lorsch, J.W. (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp. 315–342. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1987)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Katzenbach, J.R., Smith, D.K.: The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business School, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parker, G.M.: Cross-Functional Teams. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1994)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gunasekare, T.P.: Virtual teams in sri lankan business process outsourcing companies. J. Bus. Econ. Policy 2(3), 155–160 (2015)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cohen, S.G., Gibson, C.B.: In the beginning: Introduction and framework. In: Cohen, S.G., Gibson, C.B. (eds.) Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, pp. 1–13. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zaccaro, S.J., Ardison, S.D., Orvis, K.L.: Leadership in virtual teams. In: Day, D.V., Zaccaro, S.J., Halpin, S.M. (eds.) Leader Development for Transforming Organizations: Growing Leaders for Tomorrow, pp. 267–292. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bühlmann, B.: Need to Manage a Virtual Team?: Theory and Practice in a Nutshell. Cuvillier Verlag, Goettingen (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation. HarperCollins Publishers, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kumar, S., Gankotiya, A.K., Dutta, K.: A comparative study of moodle with other e-learning systems. In: 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology (ICECT 2011), Vol. 5, pp. 414–418. IEEE Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Selwyn, N.: The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 23(2), 83–94 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moodle. About Moodle. [online] last modified on 12 February 2016, at 16:05. https://docs.moodle.org/31/en/About_Moodle [cited 2016-05-30]
  43. 43.
    Edmunds, R., Thorpe, M., Conole, G.: Student attitudes towards and use of ICT in course study, work and social activity: a technology acceptance model approach. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 43(1), 71–84 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Goktas, Y., Yildirim, S., Yildirim, Z.: Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Edu. Technol. Soc. 12(1), 193–204 (2009)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., Monseur, C.: The use of ICT in education: a survey of schools in europe. Eur. J. Edu. 48(1), 11–27 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Long, S., Carlo, H., Fraser, J., Gosavi, A., Grasman, S.: Building communication skills in supply chain management and facility logistics curriculum through multi-institutional virtual teaming. In: American Society for Engineering Education 2010, paper 436, 9 p. (2010)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hvorecký, J.: Team Projects over the Internet. In: ICL 2006 Conference, 5 p. ICL, Villach (2006)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Staples, D.S., Zhao, L.: The effects of cultural diversity in virtual teams versus face-to-face teams. Group Decis. Negot. 15(4), 389–406 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    McDonough, E.F., Kahnb, K.B., Barczaka, G.: An Investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams. J. Product Innov. Manage. 18(2), 110–120 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ling, S.C.: The effects of group cultural composition and cultural attitudes on performance. In: Digitized Theses. Paper 1870 (1990)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    McLeod, P.L., Lobel, S.A.: The effects of ethnic diversity on idea generation in small groups. Acad. Manag. 1992(1), 227–231 (1992)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    McDonough, E.F., Kahn, K.B., Griffin, A.: Managing communication in global product development teams. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 46(4), 375–386 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Shachaf, P.: Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: an exploratory study. Inf. Manage. 45(2), 131–142 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Watson, W.E., Kumar, K., Michaelsen, L.K.: Cultural Diversity’s impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Acad. Manag. J. 36(3), 590–602 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hertel, G., Geister, S., Konradt, U.: Managing virtual teams: a review of current empirical research. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 15(1), 69–95 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kirchmeyer, C., Cohen, A.: Multicultural groups their performance and reactions with constructive conflict. Group Organ. Manage. 17(2), 153–170 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Maznevski, M.L., Chudoba, K.M.: Bridging space over time: global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. 11(5), 473–492 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ransone, C.L.: The nature and influence of relationship on success in a virtual work environment. In: Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University (2014)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kraut, R.E., Fussell, S.R., Brennan, S.E., Siegel, J.: Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In: Hinds, P., Kiesler, S. (eds.) Distributed Work, pp. 137–162. MIT Press, London (2002)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bušíková, A., Melicheríková, Z.: Ethics in e-Learning. In: IADIS International Conference on e-Learning, pp. 435–438. IADIS Press, Prague (2013)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dubé, L., Paré, G.: The multifaceted nature of virtual teams. In: Pauleen, D.J. (ed.) Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols and Processes, pp. 1–33. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Denhere, N., Hörne, T., van der Poll, J.A.: Managing globally distributed software development projects using virtual teams: a middle east case study. In: ACM Annual Research Conference on South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Article no. 12, 10 p. ACM, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Dossick, C.S., Homayouni, H., Lee, G.: Learning in global teams: BIM planning and coordination. Int. J. Autom. Smart Technol. 5(3), 119–135 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Daim, T.U., Ha, A., Reutiman, S., Hughes, B., Pathak, U., Bynum, W., Bhatla, A.: Exploring the communication breakdown in global virtual teams. Int. J. Project Manage. 30(2), 199–212 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hinds, P.J., Weisband, S.P.: Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In: Cohen, S.G., Gibson, C.B. (eds.) Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, pp. 21–36. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J.C., Alcordo, T.C., Baba, M.L., Britt, D., McKether, W., Monplaisir, L., Ratner, H.H., Wagne, K.H.: Context, task, and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. In: Cohen, S.G., Gibson, C.B. (eds.) Virtual Teams that Work: Creating Conditions for Virtual Team Effectiveness, pp. 239–264. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Johnston, K.A., Rosin, K.: Global virtual teams: how to manage them. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer and Management (CAMAN), pp. 1–4. IEEE Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bass, J.M., McDermott, R., Lalchandani, J.T.: Virtual teams and employability in global software engineering education. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), pp. 115–124. IEEE Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Moe, N.B., Cruzes, D., Dyba, T., Mikkelsen, E.: Continuous software testing in a globally distributed project. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), pp. 130–134. IEEE Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Curseu, P.L., Schalk, R., Wessel, I.: How do virtual teams process information? A literature review and implications for management. J. Manag. Psychol. 23(6), 628–652 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ratcheva, V., Vyakarnam, S.: Knowledge management and business model innovation: building virtual relationships. In: Malhotra, Y. (ed.) Distributed Organizational Environment, pp. 166–182. Idea Group Publishing, London (2001)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Coronas, T.T., Oliva, M.A., Luna, J.C.Y., Palma, A.M.L.: Virtual teams in higher education: a review of factors affecting creative performance. In: International Joint Conference, pp. 629–637. Springer International Publishing, Genève (2015)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Fuller, R.M., Harding, M.: The impact of interaction anticipation and incentive type on shared leadership and performance in virtual teams. In: 48th IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 732–741. IEEE Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zhan, L., Wang, N., Shen, X.-L., Sun, Y.: Knowledge quality of collaborative editing in wikipedia: an integrative perspective of social capital and team conflict. In: 19th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2015), paper 245, 10 p. AIS, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Rosen, B.: Leading virtual teams. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 21(1), 60–70 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Carter, D.R., Seely, P.W., Dagosta, J., DeChurch, L.A., Zaccaro, S.J.: Leadership for global virtual teams: facilitating teamwork processes. In: Wildman, J.L., Griffith, R.L. (eds.) Leading Global Teams, pp. 225–252. Springer, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Chase, N.: Learning to Lead a Virtual Team. Quality 38(9), 76 (1999)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hvorecký, J., Šimúth, J., Lichardus, B.: Managing rational and not-fully-rational knowledge. Acta Polytech. Hung. 10(2), 121–132 (2013)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Lin, D., Liang, Q., Xu, Z., Li, R., Xie, W.: Does knowledge management matter for information technology applications in China? Asia Pac. J. Manage. 25(3), 489–507 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Levin, D.Z., Cross, R.: The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manage. Sci. 50(11), 1477–1490 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Johannessen, J.-A., Olaisen, J., Olsen, B.: Mismanagement of tacit knowledge: the importance of tacit knowledge, the danger of information technology, and what to do about it. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 21(1), 3–20 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Foray, D., Lundvall, B.: The knowledge-based economy: from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. In: Neef, D., Siesfeld, G.A., Cefola, J. (eds.) The Economic Impact of Knowledge, pp. 115–121. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Woo, J.-H., Clayton, M.J., Johnson, R.E., Flores, B.E., Ellis, C.: Dynamic knowledge map: reusing experts’ tacit knowledge in the AEC industry. Autom. Constr. 13(2), 203–207 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Polanyi, M.: The tacit dimension. In: Prusak, L. (ed.) Knowledge in Organizations, pp. 135–146. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Green, A., Stankosky, M.: In Search of Knowledge Management: Pursuing Primary Principles. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2010)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Spiegler, I.: Knowledge management: a new idea or a recycled concept. Commun. AIS 3(4es) (2000). Article 2Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Vance, D.: Information, knowledge and wisdom: the epistemic hierarchy and computer-based information systems. In: AMCIS 1997, Paper 165. AMCIS, Indianapolis (1997)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Tuomi, I.: Data is more than knowledge: implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. In: 32nd IEEE Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1–12. IEEE Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Davenport, T.H., Marchand, D.: Is KM just good information management? Data, information and knowledge are points along a continuum. Fin. Times Mastering Ser. Mastering Inf. Manage., 2–3 (1999)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Nguyen, T., Burgess, S.: A case analysis of ICT for knowledge transfer in small businesses in vietnam. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34, 416–421 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Nonaka, I., Von Krogh, G.: Perspective-tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ. Sci. 20(3), 635–652 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Linde, C.: Narrative and social tacit knowledge. J. Knowl. Manage. 5(2), 160–171 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Smith, E.A.: The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace. J. Knowl. Manage. 5(4), 311–321 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Lopez-Nicolas, C., Soto-Acosta, P.: Analyzing ICT adoption and use effects on knowledge creation: an empirical investigation in SMEs. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 30(6), 521–528 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Skype. https://www.skype.com/en/. Accessed 05 June 2016
  96. 96.
    Microsoft Office Live Meeting 2007. https://www318.livemeeting.com/cc/usda/join. Accessed 05 June 2016
  97. 97.
    Chou, T.C., Chang, P.L., Tsai, C.T., Cheng, Y.P.: Internal learning climate, knowledge management process and perceived knowledge management satisfaction. J. Inf. Sci. 31(4), 283–296 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    SharePoint: Empowering teamwork. https://products.office.com/en-us/sharepoint/collaboration. Accessed 05 June 2016
  99. 99.
    Team Foundation Server: An enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software. https://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/products/tfs-overview-vs.aspx. Accessed 05 June 2016
  100. 100.
    Apache™ Subversion®: Enterprise-class centralized version control for the masses. https://subversion.apache.org/. Accessed 05 June 2016
  101. 101.
    Git: a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. https: https://git-scm.com/. Accessed 05 June 2016
  102. 102.
    Mercurial: a free, distributed source control management tool. https://www.mercurial-scm.org/. Accessed 05 June 2016
  103. 103.
    SonarQube: open platform to manage code quality. http://www.sonarqube.org/. Accessed 05 June 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vysoká škola manažmentuBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of IS, Faculty of ManagementComenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations