Advertisement

Team-Based Projects and Peer Assessment. IT Works!

  • Veronika Dropčová
  • Zuzana Kubincová
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 544)

Abstract

In order to make the assignments in our Web-design course more attractive for students, the educational strategies of peer assessment and team-based learning were employed. Students worked in teams on a whole-semester lasting assignment – a web application (project) based on their own designs. The project implementation was divided into three phases. After each phase all teams were supposed to submit their work for peer reviewing by other teams. Moreover, students peer-assessed also their team-mates contributions. Following this, each student’s score in every particular phase was counted based on her team project evaluation and also the peer assessment she received.

The focus of this paper is on students’ acceptance of these innovative peer assessment methods as well as on students’ opinions about their possible benefits and usefulness.

Keywords

Peer review Computer science course Team work 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported from the Slovak national VEGA project no. 1/0948/13.

References

  1. 1.
    Bejdová, V., Homola, M., Kubincová, Z.: Blogging in obligatory course: A bitter victory. In: Popescu, E., Lau, R.W.H., Pata, K., Leung, H., Laanpere, M. (eds.) ICWL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8613, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09635-3_1 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bejdová, V., Kubincová, Z., Homola, M.: Blogging activities with peer-assessment in university courses. In: ICTE 2013. Ostravská univerzita v OstravěGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bejdová, V., Kubincová, Z., Homola, M.: Are students reliable peer-reviewers? In: 2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE, Los Alamaitos (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boud, D., Falchikov, N.: Rethinking Assessment in Higher Education: Learning for the Longer Term. Routledge, London (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, W., Warren, M.: Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students’ contributions to a group project. Teach. High. Educ. 5(2), 243–255 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Churchill, D.: Educational applications of web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40(1), 179–183 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cross, K.P.: Adults as Learners: Increasing Participation and Facilitating Learning. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco (1981). ERICGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dropčová, V.: Peer Review and Peer Assessment in Higher Computer Science Education. Ph.D. thesis, Comenius University in Bratislava (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dropčová, V., Homola, M., Kubincová, Z.: May I peer-review your web design project? In: Li, Y., et al. (eds.) State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning, pp. 243–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dropčová, V., Kubincová, Z., Homola, M.: Peer review in a web design course: Now students like them too. In: ICWL. submitted (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Falchikov, N.: Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 11(2), 146–166 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Homola, M., Kubincová, Z.: Practising web design essentials by iterative blog development within a community portal. In: CSEDU (1), pp. 181–186 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Homola, M., Kubincová, Z.: Taking advantage of web 2.0 in organized education (a survey). In: Auer, M.E. (ed.) Proceedings of International Conference on Interactive Computer Aided Learning (ICL2009), pp. 741–752. Kassel University Press, Villach, Austria, September 2009Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kennedy, G.J.: Peer-assessment in group projects: is it worth it? In: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference on Computing Education, vol. 42, pp. 59–65. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kubincová, Z., Homola, M., Bejdová, V.: Motivational effect of peer review in blog-based activities. In: Wang, J.-F., Lau, R. (eds.) ICWL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8167, pp. 194–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5_20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levine, R.E.: Peer evaluation in team-based learning. In: Team-Based Learning for Health Professions Education: A Guide to Using Small Groups to Improve Learning, pp. 103–116. VA: Stylus Publishing, Sterling (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin, S.S., Liu, E.Z.F., Yuan, S.M.: Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 17(4), 420–432 (2001)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, E.F., Lin, S.S., Chiu, C.H., Yuan, S.M.: Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Trans. Educ. 44(3), 246–251 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Magzoub, M.E.M., Abdelhameed, A.A., Schmidt, H.G., Dolmans, D.H.: Assessing students in community settings: the role of peer evaluation. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 3(1), 3–13 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Michaelsen, L.K., Fink, L.D.: Calculating peer evaluation scores. In: Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching, pp. 241–248. VA: Stylus Publishing, Sterling (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Piaget, J.: Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion Press, New York (1970). Trans. D. ColtmanGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Popescu, E.: Students’ acceptance of web 2.0 technologies in higher education: Findings from a survey in a romanian university. In: 2010 Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA), pp. 92–96. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reily, K., Finnerty, P.L., Terveen, L.: Two peers are better than one: aggregating peer reviews for computing assignments is surprisingly accurate. In: 2009 Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 115–124. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reiter, H.I., Eva, K.W., Hatala, R.M., Norman, G.R.: Self and peer assessment in tutorials: Application of a relative-ranking model. Acad. Med. 77(11), 1134–1139 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Topping, K.: Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev. Educ. Res. 68(3), 249–276 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Thought and language. Ann. Dyslexia 14(1), 97–98 (1964)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu, W.S.: The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers. J. Educ. Foreign Lang. Lit. 3(2), 125–138 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Comenius University in BratislavaBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations