Advertisement

General Aspects of Transthoracic 3D-Echo

  • José-Julio Jiménez NácherEmail author
  • Gonzalo Alonso Salinas
  • Marina Pascual Izco
Chapter

Abstract

3D TTE has been one of the biggest advances in ultrasound technology. To obtain large volumes with adequate frame rate is the major challenge in 3D TTE. There are several methods of data acquisition in 3D TTE. To assess left ventricular function, it is better to choose full volume acquisition. To evaluate mitral or aortic valves, choose zoom acquisition. There are also various methods of 3D image display: slice rendering allows accurate measurements of chamber dimensions, valve areas and regurgitant jets. Cropping is very useful to remove anatomical structures to focus exclusively on the target anatomy. Apical four-chamber is the preferred view to 3D TTE left ventricle (LV) data acquisition. 3D TTE enables complete assessment of right ventricle (RV) geometry including the inflow, apex and outflow tract. 3D TTE may be superior to 2D TTE techniques diagnosing complex mitral valve disease. It enables “en face” visualization of the mitral valve from LV and LA perspectives. Parasternal long and short axis, apical and the subcostal views are the preferred to display the tricuspid valve (TV). 3D TTE aortic valve (AV) area measurement is more precise than the 2D TEE approach. 3DE short-axis view allows real AV orifice planimetry. 3D TTE has proved to be a useful tool in Congenital Heart disease (CHD) in three specific areas: improved understanding of the anatomy of the CHD, quantification of volumes and ventricular function, especially of the right ventricle and guiding therapeutic interventions.

Keywords

3D transthoracic echocardiogram Image acquisition Image display 3D artifacts Heart anatomy 

Supplementary material

Video 2.1

(AVI 361 kb)

Video 2.2

(AVI 291 kb)

Video 2.3

(AVI 341 kb)

Video 2.4

(AVI 5416 kb)

Video 2.5

(AVI 3277 kb)

Video 2.6

(AVI 706 kb)

Video 2.7

(AVI 850 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Lang RM, Badano L, Tsang W, Adams DH, et al. EAA/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three dimensional echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:1–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salgo IS. Three-dimensional echocardiography technology. Cardiol Clin. 2007;25:231–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morbach C, Lin BA, Sugeng L. Clinical application of three-dimensional echocardiography. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;57:19–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rabben SI. Technical principles of transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. In: Badano LP, Lang RM, Zamorano JL, editors. Textbook of real-time three dimensional echocardiography. London/New York: Springer; 2011. p. 9–24.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monaghan MJ. Role of real time 3D echocardiograpny in evaluating the left ventrice. Heart. 2006;92:131–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caiani EG, Corsi C, Sugeng L, et al. Improved quantification of left ventricular mass based on endocardial and epicardial surface detection with real time three dimensional echocardiography. Heart. 2006;92:213–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mor-Avi V, Sugeng L, Weinert L, et al. Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004;110:1814–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thavendiranathan P, Liu S, Verhaert D, et al. Feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of real-time full-volume 3D transthoracic echocardiography to measure LV volumes and systolic function: a fully automated endocardial contouring algorithm in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(3):239–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Zamorano JL, Pérez de Isla L, et al. Comparison of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions measured by three-dimensional echocardiography versus by two-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with various cardiomyopathies. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(6):809–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takeuchi M, Jacobs A, Sugeng L, et al. Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with Doppler tissue imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:1321–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mor-Avi V, Yodwut C, Jenkins C, et al. Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume: multicenter study for validation with CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(8):769–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lancellotti P, Moura L, Pierard LA, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve diseases). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:307–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsang W, Lang RM, Krozon I. Role of real-time three dimensional echocardiography in cardiovascular interventions. Heart. 2011;97:850–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anwar AM, Geleijnse ML, Soliman OI, et al. Assessment of normal tricuspid valve anatomy in adults by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Int J Card Imaging. 2007;23(6):717–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Zamorano JL, Prieto-Moriche E, et al. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a novel, simple, and reliable method to improve accuracy in area calculation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(10):1296–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldstein SA, Evangelista A, Abbara S, et al. Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(2):119–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bleich S, Nanda NC, Hage FG. The incremental value of three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in adult congenital heart disease. Echocardiography. 2013;30:483–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salustri A, Spitaels S, McGuie J, et al. Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography in adult patients with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:759–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hage FG, Raslam S, Dean P, et al. Real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in congenital heart disease. Echocardiography. 2012;29:220–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van der Zwaan HB, Helbing WA, Boersma E, et al. Usefulness of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography to identify right ventricular dysfunction in patients with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:843–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vettukattil JJ. Three-dimensional echocardiography in congenital heart disease. Heart. 2012;98:79–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scheurer M, Bandisode V, Ruff P, et al. Early experience with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography guidance of right ventricular biopsy in children. Echocardiography. 2006;23(1):45–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • José-Julio Jiménez Nácher
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gonzalo Alonso Salinas
    • 1
  • Marina Pascual Izco
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiology DepartmentHospital Ramón y CajalMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations