Advertisement

Experience-Based Models of Surface Proximal Aerial Robot Flight Performance in Wind

  • John W. YaoEmail author
  • Vishnu R. Desaraju
  • Nathan Michael
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics book series (SPAR, volume 1)

Abstract

This work presents an experiment-driven aerodynamic disturbance modeling technique that leverages experiences from past flights to construct a predictive model of the exogenous forces acting on an aerial robot. Specifically, we consider operation in turbulent air stemming from the interaction between wind and nearby surfaces. To construct the disturbance model, we employ Locally Weighted Projection Regression and relate the aerial robot’s state and an experimentally learned freestream wind model to the disturbance forces estimated during flight through the environment. The approach is experimentally validated through a set of flight tests in an indoor environment with artificially generated turbulent airflow that illustrate the computation of this disturbance model, its generalizability across flow conditions, and its utility for disturbance-aware motion planning.

Keywords

Wind Condition Unscented Kalman Filter Flight Experience Northwesterly Wind Disturbance Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hoffmann, G.M., Huang, H., Waslander, S.L., Tomlin, C.J.: Quadrotor helicopter flight dynamics and control: Theory and experiment. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conferrnce, vol. 2, Hilton Head, USA, August 2007Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bangura, M., Mahony, R.: Nonlinear dynamic modeling for high performance control of a quadrotor. In: Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Robotics and Automation, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 1–10, December 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Omari, S., Hua, M.D., Ducard, G., Hamel, T.: Nonlinear control of VTOL UAVs incorporating flapping dynamics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 2419–2425, November 2013Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leishman, R., Macdonald, J., Beard, R., McLain, T.: Quadrotors and accelerometers: state estimation with an improved dynamic model. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 34(1), 28–41 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abeywardena, D., Wang, Z., Dissanayake, G., Waslander, S., Kodagoda, S.: Model-aided state estimation for quadrotor micro air vehicles amidst wind disturbances. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Chicago, USA, pp. 4813–4818, September 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grande, R.C., Chowdhary, G., How, J.P.: Experimental validation of bayesian nonparametric adaptive control using gaussian processes. J. Aero. Inf. Syst. 11(9), 565–578 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohamed, A., Abdulrahim, M., Watkins, S., Clothier, R.: Development and flight testing of a turbulence mitigation system for micro air vehicles. J. Field Robot. 33(5), 639–660 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ranganathan, B.N., Penskiy, I., Dean, W., Bergbreiter, S., Humbert, J.S.: Bio-inspired wind frame state sensing and estimation for mav applications. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany, pp. 2729–2735, September 2015Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gremillion, G.M., Castano, L.M., Humbert, J.S.: Disturbance rejection with distributed acceleration and strain sensing. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, vol. 2, Kissimmee, USA, pp. 1623–1639, January 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yeo, D.W., Sydney, N., Paley, D.A.: Onboard flow sensing for rotary-wing uav pitch control in wind. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, vol. 4, National Harbor, USA, pp. 2445–2455, January 2016Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Desaraju, V., Michael, N.: Hierarchical adaptive planning in environments with uncertain, spatially-varying disturbance forces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China, pp. 5171–5176, May 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lawrance, N., Sukkarieh, S.: Path planning for autonomous soaring flight in dynamic wind fields. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, China, pp. 2499–2505, May 2011Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hollinger, G.A., Pereira, A.A., Binney, J., Somers, T., Sukhatme, G.S.: Learning uncertainty in ocean current predictions for safe and reliable navigation of underwater vehicles. J. Field Robot. 33(1), 47–66 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galway, D., Etele, J., Fusina, G.: Modeling of urban wind field effects on unmanned rotorcraft flight. J. Aircraft 48(5), 1613–1620 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bartholomew, J., Calway, A., Mayol-Cuevas, W.: Learning to predict obstacle aerodynamics from depth images for micro air vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Hong Kong, China, pp. 4967–4973, May 2014Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rasmussen, C.E., Williams, C.K.I.: Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vijayakumar, S., D’Souza, A., Schaal, S.: Incremental online learning in high dimensions. Neural Comput. 17(12), 2602–2634 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Julier, S.J., Uhlmann, J.K.: A new extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In: Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 3068, Orlando, USA, pp. 182–193, July 1997Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mahony, R., Kumar, V., Corke, P.: Multirotor aerial vehicles: modeling, estimation, and control of quadrotor. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 19(3), 20–32 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hovakimyan, N., Cao, C.: L1 Adaptive Control Theory: Guaranteed Robustness with Fast Adaptation, vol. 21. SIAM, Philadelphia (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richter, C., Bry, A., Roy, N.: Polynomial trajectory planning for aggressive quadrotor flight in dense indoor environments. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Robotics Research, Singapore, December 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Yao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vishnu R. Desaraju
    • 1
  • Nathan Michael
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations