Advertisement

Designing of Ontology for Domain Vocabulary on Agriculture Activity Ontology (AAO) and a Lesson Learned

  • Sungmin Joo
  • Seiji Koide
  • Hideaki Takeda
  • Daisuke Horyu
  • Akane Takezaki
  • Tomokazu Yoshida
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10055)

Abstract

This paper proposes Agriculture Activity Ontology (AAO) as a basis of the core vocabulary of agricultural activity. Since concepts of agriculture activities are formed by the various context such as purpose, means, crop, and field, we organize the agriculture activity ontology as a hierarchy of concepts discriminated by various properties such as purpose, means, crop and field. The vocabulary of agricultural activity is then defined as the subset of the ontology. Since the ontology is consistent, extendable, and capable of some inferences thanks to Description Logics, so the vocabulary inherits these features. The vocabulary is also linked to existing vocabularies such as AGROVOC. It is expected to use in the data format in the agricultural IT system. The vocabulary is adopted as the part of “the guideline for agriculture activity names for agriculture IT systems” issued by Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF), Japan. Also we investigated the usefulness of the ontology as the method for defining the domain vocabulary.

Keywords

Ontology Agriculture Agronomic sciences Knowledge representation Core vocabulary Vocabulary management 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI), Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), “Technologies for creating next-generation agriculture, forestry and fisheries” (funding agency: Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution, NARO).

References

  1. 1.
    AGROVOC Multilingual agricultural thesaurus. Subsequences. J. Mol. Biol. 147, 195–197 (1981). http://aims.fao.org/vest-registry/vocabularies/agrovoc-multilingual-agricultural-thesaurus
  2. 2.
    Baader, F., et al. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riesbeck, Christopher K., Roger C. Schank, Inside Case-Based Reasoning, ISBN 0-89856-767-6, LEA (1989)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    OWL Web Ontology Language Guide, W3C Recommendation 10, February 2004 https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/
  5. 5.
    Koide, S., Takeda, H.: OWL-full reasoning from an object oriented perspective. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 263–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi: 10.1007/11836025_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koide, S.: Theory and implementation of object oriented semantic web language Dr.thesis, Department Informatics School of Multidisciplinary Sciences, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    RDF 1.1 Turtle, Terse RDF Triple Language, W3C Recommendation 25, February 2014. https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/
  8. 8.
    Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (MAFF), Japan: the guideline for agriculture activity names for agriculture IT systems (2016). http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/it2/senmon_bunka/shiryo/shiryo04.pdf (in japanese)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sungmin Joo
    • 1
  • Seiji Koide
    • 2
  • Hideaki Takeda
    • 1
  • Daisuke Horyu
    • 3
  • Akane Takezaki
    • 3
  • Tomokazu Yoshida
    • 3
  1. 1.National Institute of InformaticsTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Ontolonomy, LLC.YokohamaJapan
  3. 3.National Agriculture and Food Research OrganizationIbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations