Women’s Role in Biotechnology Research: The Case of Mexico

  • Humberto Merritt
  • Maria Pilar M. Perez-Hernandez
Chapter

Abstract

It is widely recognized that women face a number of gender-related barriers to succeed in science and technology. Specifically, most women seeking to pursue an academic career need to overcome not only professional hurdles but also personal and social obstacles. Although women have made strides in closing the gender gap, especially in life sciences, many still face professional exclusion. In Mexico, biotechnology is one of the few fields where women scientists participate in large numbers. The School of Biological Sciences of the National Polytechnic Institute (ENCB-IPN) is one of the country’s most prestigious academic institutions where women enrolled in life sciences have had a long tradition to teaching and carrying out scientific research. In this chapter, we explore the involvement of female scientists from ENCB in patenting and commercializing biotechnology research. By drawing on the Espacenet international patent database we were able to identify how these women scientists interact with their male colleagues. Empirical findings suggest that most female scientists from ENCB tend to patent in collaboration with male scientists, whereas only a handful of them patent alone. We also report how they deal with this situation and what the challenges for pursuing an entrepreneurial vocation in the Mexican scientific milieu are.

References

  1. Blazquez, N., and J. Flores. 2005. Género y Ciencia en América Latina: El Caso de México. In Ciencia, Tecnología y Género en Iberoamérica, ed. N. Blazquez, and J. Flores, 305–328. México: UNAM/Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades.Google Scholar
  2. Blickenstaff, J.C. 2005. Women and Science Careers: Leaky Pipeline or Gender Filter? Gender and Education 17 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/09540250500145072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brush, C.G. 2008. Women Entrepreneurs: A Research Overview. In The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship, ed. M.C. Casson, B. Yeung, A. Basu, et al., 611–628. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. CONACYT. 2014. Informe General del Estado de la Ciencia y la Tecnología 2013. México: CONACYT.Google Scholar
  5. Cotter, D.A., J.M. Hermsen, S. Ovadia, and R. Vanneman. 2001. The Glass Ceiling Effect. Social Forces 80 (2): 655–681. doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlstrand, Å.L., and D. Politis. 2013. Women Business Ventures in Swedish University Incubators. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 5 (1): 78–96. doi:10.1108/17566261311305229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ecklund, E.H., A.E. Lincoln, and C. Tansey. 2012. Gender Segregation in Elite Academic Science. Gender & Society 26 (5): 693–717. doi:10.1177/0891243212451904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, and B. Uzzi. 2000. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hualde, A. 2012. Conocimiento Truncado: Las Carreras de las Mujeres en Ciencia y Tecnología. In Innovación y Crisis: Trayectorias y Respuestas de Empresas y Sectores, ed. J. Micheli, E.A. Medellín, J. Jasso, and A. Hidalgo, 289–316. México: UAM Azcapotzalco/Miguel Ángel Porrúa.Google Scholar
  10. IPN-Instituto Politécnico Nacional. 2015. [National Polytechnic Institute – IPN]. Informe Anual de Actividades. 2014. [Annual Report 2014 in Spanish]. Mexico: Instituto Politécnico Nacional. http://bit.ly/1M1qx91. Accessed on 27 Oct 2015.
  11. Kelley, D.J., C.G. Brush, P.G. Greene, and Y. Litovsky. 2013. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2012 Women’s Report. Babson Park, MA: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.Google Scholar
  12. Louis, K.S., D. Blumenthal, M.E. Gluck, and M.A. Stoto. 1989. Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors among Life Scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly 34 (1): 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maliniak, D., R. Powers, and B.F. Walter. 2013. The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations. International Organization 67 (4): 889–922. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin, L., L. Wright, Z. Beaven, and H. Matlay. 2015. An Unusual Job for A Woman? Female Entrepreneurs in Scientific, Engineering and Technology Sectors. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research 21 (4): 539–556. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-08-2011-0095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Merritt, H. 2008. La Política de la Innovación Industrial en México: Una Revisión Crítica. Denarius 18: 125–160. http://bit.ly/1GI0eV5. Accessed on 28 Apr 2015.
  16. Merritt, H. 2015. The Role of Human Capital in University-Business Cooperation: The Case of Mexico. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 6 (3): 568–588. doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0258-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Murray, F.E. 2004. The Role of Academic Inventors in Entrepreneurial Firms: Sharing the Laboratory Life. Research Policy 33 (4): 643–659. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murray, F.E., and L. Graham. 2007. Buying Science and Selling Science: Gender Differences in the Market for Commercial Science. Industrial and Corporate Change 16 (4): 657–689. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD. 2006. Women in Scientific Careers: Unleashing the Potential. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  20. OECD. 2009. Reviews of Innovation Policy: Mexico. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  21. OECD. 2014. Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD. 1994. Reviews of national science and technology policy: Mexico. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Pérez-Hernández, P, O. Súchil., A. Sánchez, and J. González. 2011. Transición a la universidad emprendedora: el caso del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Conference paper presented in Spanish at XVI Congreso Latino-Iberoamericano de Gestión Tecnológica, Oct 2011, Lima Perú.Google Scholar
  24. Polkowska, D. 2013. Women Scientists in the Leaking Pipeline: Barriers to the Commercialisation of Scientific Knowledge by Women. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 8 (2): 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ranga, L.M., and H. Etzkowitz. 2010. Athena in the World of Techne: The Gender Dimension of Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 5 (1): 1–12. doi:10.4067/S0718-27242010000100001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosa, P., and A. Dawson. 2006. Gender and the Commercialization of University Science: Academic Founders of Spinout Companies. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 18 (4): 341–366. doi:10.1080/08985620600680059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosser, S. 2014. The Gender Gap in Patents. In Women, Science, and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies, ed. M. Wyer, M. Barbercheck, D. Cookmeyer, et al., 111–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Smith-Doerr, L. 2004. Women’s Work: Gender Equality vs. Hierarchy in the Life Sciences. Boulder CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Stephan, P.E., and A. El-Ganainy. 2007. The Entrepreneurial Puzzle: Explaining the Gender Gap. Journal of Technology Transfer 32 (5): 475–487. doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9033-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UNESCO. 2007. Science, Technology and Gender: An International Report. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  31. Villa, E. 2009. Un Logro de Todos: Informe de la Administración 2004–2009 [Administration Report 2004–2009 in Spanish]. Mexico: Instituto Politécnico Nacional. http://bit.ly/1LxD1UJ. Accessed on 28 Apr 2015.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Humberto Merritt
    • 1
  • Maria Pilar M. Perez-Hernandez
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Sciences Research CenterNational Polytechnic Institute of MexicoCiudad de MexicoMexico
  2. 2.National Polytechnic Institute of MexicoCentro de Incubación de Empresas de Base Tecnológica CIEBT IPNCDMXMexico

Personalised recommendations