Abstract
Advances in technology have had a significant impact on the way in which we produce and consume music. The music industry is most likely to continue progressing in tandem with the evolution of electronics and computing technology. Despite the incredible power of today’s computers , it is commonly acknowledged that computing technology is bound to progress beyond today’s conventional models. Researchers working in the relatively new field of Unconventional Computing (UC) are investigating a number of alternative approaches to develop new types of computers, such as harnessing biological media to implement new kinds of processors. This chapter introduces the field of UC for sound and music, focusing on the work developed at Plymouth University’s Interdisciplinary Centre for Computer Music Research (ICCMR ) in the UK. From musical experiments with Cellular Automata modelling and in vitro neural networks , to quantum computing and bioprocessing, this chapter introduces the substantial body of scientific and artistic work developed at ICCMR. Such work has paved the way for ongoing research towards the development of robust general-purpose bioprocessing components, referred to as biomemristors , and interactive musical biocomputers .
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamatzky, A. (2007). Physarum machine: Implementation of a Kolmogorov-Uspensky machine on a biological substrate. Parallel Processing Letters, 17(04), 455–467.
Adamatzky, A., et al. (2010). Advances in Physarum machines gates, hulls, mazes and routing with slime mould. In K. Bosschere (Ed.), Applications, tools and techniques on the road to exascale computing (pp. 41–55). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Adamatzky, A. (Ed.). (2016). Advances to unconventional computing (Vol. 1 & 2). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
Adamatzky, A., Costello, B., Melhuish, C., & Ratcliffe, N. (2003). Experimental reaction-diffusion chemical processors for robot path planning. Journal of Intelligent Robotic Systems, 37(3), 233–249.
Armstrong, R., & Ferracina, S. (Eds.). (2013). Unconventional computing: Design methods for adaptive architecture. Toronto: Riverside Architectural Press.
Aspray, W. (1990). John von Neumann and the origins of modern computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bontorin, G., Renaud, S., Gerenne, A., Alvado, L., Le Masson, G., & Thomas, J. (2007). A real-time closed-loop setup for hybrid neural networks. In Proceedings of 29th annual conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (pp. 3004–3007), Lyon, France.
Caleffi, M., Akyildiz, I. F., & Paura, L. (2015). On the solution of the Steiner tree NP-hard problem via Physarum bionetwork. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 23(4), 1092–1106.
Chua, L. (1971). Memristor-the missing circuit element. IEEE Transactions on Circuit Theory, 18(5), 507–519.
Chua, L. (2015). Everything you wish to know about memristors but are afraid to ask. Radioengineering, 24(2), 319–368.
DeMarse, T., Wagenaar, D. A., Blau, A. W., & Potter, S. M. (2001). The neurally controlled animat: Biological brains acting with simulated bodies. Autonomous Robots, 11(3), 305–310.
Dewdney, A. K. (1988). Computer recreations: The hodgepodge machine makes waves. Scientific American, August: 104–107.
Doornbusch, P. (2004). Computer sound synthesis in 1951: The music of CSIRAC. Computer Music Journal, 28(1), 10–25.
Ellis, J. (2006). Standard model of particle physics. Encyclopedia of astronomy and astrophysics. Bristol: IOP Publishing.
Gale, E., Adamatzky, A., & Costello, B. (2014). Are slime moulds living memristors?. Available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.3414. Last visited October 31, 2014.
Jones, J. (2010). The emergence and dynamical evolution of complex transport networks from simple low-level behaviours. International Journal of Unconventional Computing, 6(2), 125–144.
Kamioka, H., Maeda, E., Jimbo, Y., Robinson, H. P. C., & Kawana, A. (1996). Spontaneous periodic synchronized bursting during formation of mature patterns of connections in cortical cultures. Neuroscience Letters, 206(1–2), 109–112.
Kike, A., Chiaramonte, A., Troisi, A., & Miranda, E. (2013). Could chamber: A duet for violin and subatomic particles. Movie on YouTube http://www.alexiskirke.com/#cloud-chamber
Kirke, A., Miranda, E., Chiaramonte, A., Troisi, A. R., Matthias, J., Radtke, J., et al. (2011). Cloud chamber: A performance involving real time two-way interaction between subatomic radioactive particles and violinist. In Proceedings of international computer music conference (ICMC 2011), Huddersfield, UK.
Kolmogorov, A. N., & Uspenskii, V. A. (1958). On the definition of an algorithm. Uspekhi Matematicheskikh Nauk 13(4), 3–28. (In Russian) English translation in AMS Translations 1963 Series 2, Vol. 21, pp. 217–245.
Meyer, R., & Stocking, W. (1970). Studies on microplasmodia of Physarum polycephalum V. Cell Biology International Reports, 3(4), 321–330.
Miranda, E. R. (1994). Olivine tress. Musical composition on SoundCloud https://soundcloud.com/ed_miranda/olivine-trees. Last accessed on September 10, 2016.
Miranda, E. R. (1995). Granular synthesis of sounds by means of a cellular automaton. Leonardo, 28(4), 297–300.
Miranda, E. R. (2002). Computer sound design: Synthesis techniques and programming. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Focal Press.
Miranda, E. R. (2014). Biocomputer music. Musical composition on SoundCloud https://soundcloud.com/ed_miranda/biocomputer-music. Last accessed on September 10, 2016.
Miranda, E. R. (2015). Biocomputer music: A composition for piano and biocomputer. Video documentary on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/111409050. Last accessed on September 20, 2016.
Miranda, E. R. (2016). Music biocomputing. Video documentary on Vimeo https://vimeo.com/163427284. Last accessed on September 20, 2016.
Miranda, E. R., Adamatzky, A., & Jones, J. (2011). Sounds synthesis with slime mould of Physarum polycephalum. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 8(2), 107–113.
Miranda, E. R., Bull, L., Gueguen, F., & Uroukov, I. S. (2009). Computer music meets unconventional computing: Towards sound synthesis with in vitro neural networks. Computer Music Journal, 33(1), 09–18.
Miranda, E. R., Nelson, P., & Smaill, A. (1992). ChaOs: A model for granular synthesis by means of cellular automata. Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre—Annual Report 1991–1992 & project directory (pp. 153–156).
Newby, G., Hamley, I., King, S., Martin, C., & Terrill, N. (2009). Structure, rheology and shear alignment of Pluronic block copolymer mixtures. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 329(1), 54–61.
Nicolis, G., & De Wit, A. (2007). Reaction-diffusion systems. Scholarpedia 2(9), 1475. Available on-line http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Reaction-diffusion_systems. Last accessed on September 21, 2016.
Novellino, A., D’Angelo, P., Cozzi, L., Chiappalone, M., Sanguineti, V., & Martinoia, S. (2007). Connecting neurons to a mobile robot: An in vitro bidirectional neural interface. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2007, Article ID 12725.
Pershin, Y. V., La Fontaine, S., & Di Ventra, M. (2009). Memristive model of amoeba learning. Physical Review E, 80(2), 021926.
Potter, A. M., DeMarse, T. B., Bakkum, D. J., Booth, M. C., Brumfield, J. R., Chao, Z., et al. (2004). Hybrots: hybrids of living neurons and robots for studying neural computation. In Proceedings of brain inspired cognitive systems, Stirling, UK.
Radtke, J. (2001). Diffusion cloud chamber owner’s guide, Version 2.5. Madison: Reflection Imaging Inc.
Shu, J. J., Wang, Q. W., Yong, K. Y., Shao, F., & Lee, K. J. (2015). Programmable DNA-mediated multitasking processor. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 119(17), 5639–5644.
Strukov, D. B., Sneider, G. S., Stewart, D. R., & Williams, R. S. (2008). The missing memristor found. Nature, 453, 80–83.
Swade, D. (1991). Charles Babbage and his calculating engines. London: Science Museum.
Truax, B. (1988). Real-time granular synthesis with a digital signal processor. Computer Music Journal, 12(2), 14–26.
Turing, A. M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42(2), 230–265.
Uroukov, I., Ma, M., Bull, L., & Purcell, W. (2006). MEA recordings of the spontaneous behaviour of hen embryo brain spheroids. In Proceedings of the 5th international meeting on substrate-integrated micro electrode arrays (pp. 232–234). BIOPRO.
Valle, A., & Lombardo, V. (2003). A two-level method to control granular synthesis. In Proceedings of the XIV colloquium on musical informatics (XIV CIM 2003). Firenze, Italy.
Acknowledgments
Most of the work presented in this chapter was developed in collaboration with colleagues within our university and beyond. We thank Antonino Chiaramonte, Anna Troisi, John Matthias, Nick Fry and Cathy McCabe of Plymouth University for their contribution to the musical experiments with particle physics. Larry Bull and Ivan Uroukov, at University of West of England, Bristol, and ICCMR post-graduate student Francois Gueguen, contributed to the work with in vitro neural networks .
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miranda, E.R., Kirke, A., Braund, E., Antoine, A. (2017). On Unconventional Computing for Sound and Music. In: Miranda, E. (eds) Guide to Unconventional Computing for Music. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49881-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49881-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49880-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49881-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)