Quality of Hypertensive Patients’ Electronic Health Records in Specialized Cardiological Centre: 6-Year Trends
Electronic health records (EHRs) have the potential to form the basis for a personalized approach to patient management, deliver high-quality care, and make the healthcare system more efficient and safer. Finding and studying the possible trends and long term changes of individual results in stored medical data may facilitate selection of an optimal treatment plan. Moreover, guidelines on disease management usually include only shifted results of clinical trials that are poorly generalized to routine clinical practice. In numerous EHR-related errors have been described, such as unstructured data, missing data, and incorrectly entered data. This study aims to assess the quality of hypertensive patients’ EHRs during 6 years after the implementation of EHRs in the specialized cardiological centre. The quality of patients’ EHRs was estimated by the completeness and consistency of stored data. We compared information entered into EHRs with diagnostic algorithms recommended by hypertension management guidelines. The results demonstrated the incompleteness and inconsistency of information in EHRs on risk factors, diabetes mellitus (DM), and subclinical organ damage. An assessment of six-year trends showed that the quality of data decreased in parallel with increase of workload of the clinic (estimated by the number of primary visits). Results indicate the urgent need for an action plan to resolve the problem of data incompleteness and inconsistency. Integration of specially designed clinical decision support system (CDSS) considered as a possible decision promoting an increase of EHRs quality. This study is part of a larger project aimed to develop of complex CDSS on cardiovascular disorders for medical research centre.
KeywordsElectronic health records Risk factors Diabetes mellitus Subclinical organ damage Completeness and consistency of information Learning curves Statistical data analysis
This paper is financially supported by The Russian Scientific Foundation, Agreement #14-11-00826 (10.07.2014).
- 3.Cruz-Correia, R., Rodrigues, P., Freitas, A., Almeida, F., Chen, R., Costa-Pereira, A.: Data quality and integration issues in electronic health records. In: Hristidis, V. (ed.) Information Discovery on Electronic Health Records, pp. 55–95. CRC Press, London (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Embi, P.J., Jain, A., Clark, J., Harris, C.M.: Development of an electronic health record-based clinical trial alert system to enhance recruitment at the point of care. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp. 231–235 (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.Mancia, G., et al.: 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur. Heart J. 34(28), 2159–2219 (2013). doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sundgren, M., Wilson, P., De Zegher, I.: Making the most of the electronic age. Eur. Pharm. Contractor 3, 18–21 (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.Turisco, F., Keogh, D., Stubbs, C., Glaser, J., Crowley Jr., W.F.: Current status of integrating information technologies into the clinical research enterprise within US Academic Health Centers: Strategic value and opportunities for investment. J. Investig. Med. 53(8), 425–433 (2005). doi: 10.2310/6650.2005.53806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar