Advertisement

E-Participation Projects Development in the E-Governance Institutional Structure of the Eurasian Economic Union’s Countries: Comparative Overview

  • Radomir Bolgov
  • Vitalina Karachay
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 674)

Abstract

The paper provides preliminary results of the comparative overview of e-participation projects development within the e-governance institutional structure in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) member-states. The authors analyze (1) Legal base on e-governance and e-participation; (2) E-governance institutions and stuff; (3) Participation instruments of public engagement. In future the authors plan to elaborate the methodology of e-participation processes monitoring in the countries of the EAEU, and to examine the issue of e-governance institutions effectiveness in the EAEU region.

Keywords

Electronic governance Electronic participation Information and communication technologies (ICT) Institutional structure Citizen engagement Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) Eurasian integration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research was conducted with the support of Russian Foundation for Humanities, Grant №. 15-03-00715.

References

  1. 1.
    Aksyonov, A.: International ICT-development ratings (Mezhdunarodnye reitingi urovnya razvitiya ICT). http://d-russia.ru/mezhdunarodnye-rejtingi-urovnya-razvitiya-ikt.html
  2. 2.
    Astrom, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., Pirannejad, A.: Understanding the rise of e-participation in nondemocracies: domestic and international factors. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(2), 142–150 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bershadskaya, L., Chugunov, A., Dzhusupova, Z.: Understanding e-government development barriers in CIS countries and exploring mechanisms for regional cooperation. In: 2nd Joint International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, and International Conference on Electronic Democracy, pp. 87–101 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bolgov, R., Chugunov, A., Filatova, O., Misnikov, Y.: Electronic identification of citizens: comparing perspectives and approaches. In: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2014), October 27–30, 2014, Guimarães, Portugal, pp. 484–485. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolgov, R., Karachay, V., Zinovieva, E.: Information society development in eurasian economic union countries: legal aspects. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 8th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (ICEGOV 2014), pp. 387–390, October 27–30, 2014, Guimarães, Portugal. ACM Press, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Junusbekova, G.A.: Electronic government in Republic of Kazakhstan as a way to improve state government system. Life Sci. J. 10(4), 1353–1360 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karachay, V., Bolgov, R.: An overview of the e-governance development in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries: the case of Russia. electronic governance and open society: challenges in Eurasia. In: Proceedings of the International Conference, EGOSE 2015, 24–25 November, 2015, pp. 59–65 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marushka, D., Ablameyko, M.: Belarus and the baltic states: comparison study on e- government development results. In: 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2013, pp. 382–383 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Measuring and Evaluating e-Participation (METEP): Assessment of Readiness at the Country Level. http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/METEP%20framework_18%20Jul_MOST%20LATEST%20Version.pdf
  11. 11.
    Misnikov, Y.: E-Participation as a process and practice: What METEP can measure, why and how? UNDESA (2013). http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/UNPAN90456.pdf
  12. 12.
    Pardo, T., Styrin, E.: Digital government implementation: a comparative study in USA and Russia. In: 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2010, vol. 5, pp. 3815–3824 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Russia and Kyrgyzstan will activate the cooperation in the sphere of electronic government (Rossiya i Kirgiziya Aktiviziruyut Sotrudnichestvo v Oblasti Electronnogo Pravitelstva). http://minsvyaz.ru/ru/events/33432/
  14. 14.
    Sedikin, M.A.: e-Participation as dialog between the state and the citizens (Electronnoye Uchastie kak Dialog Vlasti I Obschestve). In: Discussion (Discussia), vol. 1 (№. 31), January 2013. http://www.journal-discussion.ru/publication.php?id=204
  15. 15.
    Sideridis, A.B., Protopappas, L., Tsiafoulis, S., Pimenidis, E.: Smart cross-border e-gov systems and applications. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 570, pp. 151–165 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Challenges of Theories on Democracy. Elaboration over new Trends in Transitology. Boulder, NY (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Chiefs of EAEU Member-States Ratified New Structure of EEC Collegium (Glavy EAES Utverdili Noviy Sostav Kollegii EEC). http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/nae/news/Pages/22-12-2015-5.aspx
  18. 18.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.E-Governance CenterITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations