Advertisement

The Applicability of International Techniques for E-Participation Assessment in the Russian Context

  • Lyudmila Vidiasova
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 674)

Abstract

The paper presents a review on existed approaches to e-participation assessment with the focus on indicators and proposed metrics. A research on the applicability of international tools for e-participation evaluation to the Russian context has been conducted.

The focus of the analysis was concentrated on the Russian legislator documents that determine e-participation development. Based on the normative base study, a comprehensive research of international techniques for assessing the progress in this sphere has been developed. The researchers determine 10 spheres to be evaluated in accordance with stated goals and targets, and 5 international tools for e-participation evaluation reflecting different specific of the research phenomenon.

The research revealed the necessity of two kinds of innovations. The first one reflects the demand to develop a clear detailed strategic document describing e-participation targets, prospects and orientations. The second one is connected with the development of a monitoring system for e-participation evaluation adequate for the Russian context.

Keywords

E-participation Evaluation Monitoring Effectiveness Assessment Regulations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted with support of the Grant of the President of the Russian Federation to young scientists №MK-5953.2016.6 “The research of e-participation tools development factors in Russian Federation”.

References

  1. 1.
    Akhremenko, A.S.: A dynamic approach to the mathematical modeling of political stability. Polit. Stud. 3, 105–112 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alathur, S., Vigneswara, I., Gupta, M.P.: Citizen empowerment and participation in e-democracy: Indian context. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 11–19 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Federal law №59 “On the order debated the requests of citizens of the Russian Federation” from 21.04.2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedrich, C.J.: Constitutional Government and Democracy: Theory and Practice in Europe and America. Ginn, Boston (1950)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gil-Garcia, R., Pardo, T.: Multi-method approaches to digital government research: value lessons and implementation challenges. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences (HICSS-39) (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jho, W., Song, K.: Institutional and technological determinants of civil e-Participation: solo or duet? Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 488–495 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karkin, N., Janssen, M.: Evaluating websites from a public value perspective: a review of Turkish local government websites. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 34, 351–363 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Macintosh, A., Whyte, A.: Towards an evaluation framework for e-Participation. Transf. Gov. People Process Policy 2(1), 16–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Measuring and Evaluating e-Participation (METEP): Assessment of Readiness at the Country Level. UNDESA Working Paper (2013). http://workspace.unpan.org/sites/Internet/Documents/METEP%20framework_18%20Jul_MOST%20LATEST%20Version.pdf
  10. 10.
    Medaglia, R.: eParticipation research: moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Gov. Inf. Q. 29, 346–360 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Presidential decree of the Russian Federation № 601 “On the main directions of governance improvement” from 07.05.2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schroetera, R., Scheel, O., Renn, O., Schweizer, P.: Testing the value of public participation in Germany: theory, operationalization and a case study on the evaluation of participation. Energ. Res. Soc. Sci. (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.013 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., Weerakkody, V.: Evaluating the use impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government. Gov. Inf. Q. 32, 473–487 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    State Program “Information Society” (2011–2010). The Russian government regulation №313 from 13.04.2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Systematic project of e-Government in Russia. Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communication (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ter’an, L., Drobnjak, A.: An evaluation framework for eParticipation: the VAAs case study. Int. Scholary Sci. Res. Innov. 7(1), 77–85 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Yakimets, V.N., Leonova, M.V.: The composite index assessing the effectiveness of information resources feedback of the Russian federal authorities. In: Proceedings of “Internet and modern society conference”, IMS 2007, pp. 217–220 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zheng, Y., Schachter, H.L., Holzer, M.: The impact of government from e-participation: a study of New Jersey municipalities. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, 653–659 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITMO UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations