Advertisement

Managerial Tools and the Network-as-Practice Perspective

  • Jukka Vesalainen
  • Magnus Hellström
  • Katri Valkokari
Chapter

Abstract

We conceptualize a networks-as-practice model by grounding our systems framework in the resource-based view (RBV), on the one hand, and in the strategy-as-practice perspective, on the other. From the RBV, we adopt the idea of valuable resources that are developed or deployed through activities. These activities are analogous to the practices in the practice-based approach, that is, generic ways of performing various tasks or functions. The notion of praxis in the practice-based approach gives our framework a dynamic character. Praxis, that is, actual activities or actual ways to perform general practices, have a tendency to maintain, reinforce, as well as transform the general practices. The tools introduced in the book represent networking practices that are designed to guide actual behavior in interorganizational boundaries.

Keywords

Social Capital Network Management Boundary Spanner Practice Theory Network Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice: Taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202–210. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.06.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berthod, O., Grothe-Hammer, M., & Sydow, J. (2016). Network ethnography: A mixed-method approach for the study of practices in interorganizational settings. Organizational Research Methods. doi: 10.1177/1094428116633872.
  4. Chakrabarti, R., Ramos, C., & Henneberg, S. (2013). Network dynamics in the UK pharmaceutical network—A network-as-practice perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3), 356–371. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cousins, P. D., & Lawson, B. (2007). The effect of socialization mechanisms and performance measurement on supplier integration in new product development. British Journal of Management, 18(3), 311–326. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00514.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 345–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1998.1255632.Google Scholar
  8. Freytag, P. V., & Ritter, T. (2005). Dynamics of relationships and networks—Creation, maintenance and destruction as managerial challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(7), 644–647. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 279–301. doi: 10.1177/1470593111408177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Holmström, J., Ketokivi, M., & Hameri, A.-P. (2009). Bridging practice and theory: A design science approach. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 65–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hultman, J., & Axelsson, B. (2007). Towards a typology of transparency for marketing management research. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5), 627–635. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarzabkowski, P., & Kaplan, S. (2015). Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 537–558. doi: 10.1002/smj.2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnston, D. A., McCutcheon, D. M., Stuart, F. I., & Kerwood, H. (2004). Effects of supplier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships. Journal of Operations Management, 22(1), 23–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kajüter, P., & Kulmala, H. I. (2005). Open-book accounting in networks. Potential achievement and reasons for failures. Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 179–204. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2005.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lavie, D. (2006). The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 638–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lui, S. S., & Ngo, H. (2005). An action pattern model of inter-firm cooperation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1123–1153. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00536.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. doi: 10.2307/259373.Google Scholar
  20. Nicolajsen, H. W., & Scupola, A. (2011). Investigating issues and challenges for customer involvement in business services innovation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(5), 368–376. doi: 10.1108/08858621111144424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011). Clearing a path through the forest: A meta-review of interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1108–1136. doi: 10.1177/0149206311407507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piercy, N. F. (2009). Strategic relationships between boundary-spanning functions: Aligning customer relationship management with supplier relationship management. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(8), 857–864. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramírez, R., & Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 49–65. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199901)20:1<49::AID-SMJ20>3.0.CO;2-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stanko, M. A., Bonner, J. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2007). Building commitment in buyer–seller relationships: A tie strength perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(8), 1094–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Truong, Y., Simmons, G., & Palmer, M. (2012). Reciprocal value propositions in practice: Constraints in digital markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Whittington, R. (2006). Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, 27(5), 613–634. doi: 10.1177/0170840606064101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jukka Vesalainen
    • 1
  • Magnus Hellström
    • 2
  • Katri Valkokari
    • 3
  1. 1.University of VaasaVaasaFinland
  2. 2.Åbo Akademi UniversityTurkuFinland
  3. 3.VTT Technical Research Center of FinlandTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations