Digital Competence and Capability Frameworks in the Context of Learning, Self-Development and HE Pedagogy

  • David Biggins
  • Debbie Holley
  • George Evangelinos
  • Marketa Zezulkova
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 180)

Abstract

The paper explores and compares digital competence (DigComp) framework, published by EU in 2013 and updated in 2016, with digital capabilities (DigCap) framework introduced within the UK higher and further education context in 2009 and updated in 2015. The similarities found between the updated versions are in the increased focus on data in the context of privacy and overall literacy, as well as in the inclusion of wellbeing into the key areas. The main difference between the digital competence and capabilities frameworks is in the DigComp’s neglect of life-long learning and self-development. The paper further discusses the frameworks, their similarities and differences, through a single UK institution case study of a technology enhanced learning toolkit for HE. It then concludes by arguing for a human-centered approach to digital competence and capability frameworks, in which learning, self-development and wellbeing should play a vital role.

Keywords

Competence Capability Framework Toolkit Learning Wellbeing 

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission: Measuring Digital Skills across the EU: EU wide indicators of Digital Competence (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evangelinos, G., Holley, D.: A Qualitative exploration of the EU digital competence (DIGCOMP) framework: a case study within healthcare education. In: Vincenti, G., Bucciero, A., Vaz de Carvalho, C. (eds.) E-Learning, E-Education, and Online-Training (ELEOT) First International Conference, Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, pp. 85–92. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13293-8
  3. 3.
    Evangelinos, G., Holley, D.: A qualitative exploration of the DIGCOMP digital competence framework: attitudes of students, academics and administrative staff in the health faculty of a UK HEI. EAI Endorsed Trans. e-Learn. 2(6), e1 (2015). doi: 10.4108/el.2.6.e1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zezulkova, M.: Media learning in primary school classroom: Following teachers’ beliefs and children’s interests. In: Kotilainen, S., and Kupiainen, R. (eds.) Reflections on Media Education Futures, pp. 159–169 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union: Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission: Digital Single Market Europe 2020 strategy https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/europe-2020-strategy
  7. 7.
    European Commission: DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Commission: Youth Strategy on Health and Wellbeing. http://ec.europa.eu/youth/policy/youth_strategy/health_wellbeing_en.htm
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Beetham, H., McGill, L., Littlejohn, A.: Thriving in the 21st century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA project) (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Celot, P.: Study on Assessment Criteria for Media Literacy Levels (2009). http://ec.europa.eu/culture/library/studies/literacy-criteria-report_en.pdf
  12. 12.
    Mansell, R.: Here comes the revolution – the European Digital Agenda. In: Donders, K., Pauwels, C., Loisen, J. (eds.) The Palgrave Handbook of European Media Policy, pp. 202–217. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    European Commission: Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    JISC: Learning in a Digital Age Extending higher education opportunities for lifelong learning (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pepler, G., Jeans, N.: Summary of Jisc Digital Student Skills Sector study: preliminary review of the Learner Focus Groups (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage. Quin, Thousands Oak (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quinn, R.E.: Building the bridge as you walk on it: a guide for leading change. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heppell, S.: From Digital Literacy to Capability: Critical review (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Alkier, S.: The Capability Approach and Well-Being Measurement for Public Policy (2015). http://www.ophi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/OPHIWP094.pdf
  21. 21.
    McDougall, J., Readman, M., Wilkinson, P.: From Digital Literacy to Digital Capability. http://www.cemp.ac.uk/downloads/From%20Digital%20Literacy%20to%20Capability%20-%20Project%20Report.pdf

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Biggins
    • 1
  • Debbie Holley
    • 1
  • George Evangelinos
    • 2
  • Marketa Zezulkova
    • 3
  1. 1.Bournemouth UniversityCentre for Excellence in LearningPooleUK
  2. 2.Anglia Ruskin UniversityFaculty of Health Social Care and EducationCambridgeUK
  3. 3.Insitute of Communication Studies & JournalismCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations