Advertisement

Setting the Stage for Creativity: Upstream, Mid-stream, and Downstream

  • Leigh Thompson
  • David Schonthal
Chapter

Abstract

The most common question we get as researchers and practitioners is: how to instigate creativity in teams and organizations? Some managers are focused downstream, on the development of a product; others are focused upstream—such as how to start thinking big. However, managers often forget about the mid-stream process. In this chapter, we combine insights from scientific research with actual examples and case studies to identify specific stage-setting processes that leaders and managers need to take in order to keep the raft moving through the mid-stream rapids and get downstream, and finally ashore. We point out the key challenges at each point in the creative river and how to leverage the talents of the team and organization.

Keywords

Task Conflict Social Loafing Design Firm Creative Enterprise Quantity Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Asch, S.E.: Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychol. Monogr.: General Appl. 70(9), 1 (1956)Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, C.: The Verdict of Peace. Pan Books, London (2002)Google Scholar
  3. Bouchard, T.J.: Training, motivation, and personality as determinants of the effectiveness of brainstorming groups and individuals. J. Appl. Psychol. 56(4), 324–331 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. Dunbar, K.: How scientists think: online creativity and conceptual change in science. In: Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., Vaid, S. (eds.) Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes, pp. 461–493. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farh, J.L., Lee, C., Farh, I.C.: Task conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when. J. Appl. Psychol. 95(6), 1173–1180 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferguson, E.D.: Adler’s motivational theory: an historical perspective on belonging and the fundamental human striving. Individ. Psychol. 45(3), 354 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. Howard, Dekonick, Culley: The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation 21(4), 263–274 (2010) Google Scholar
  8. Karau, S.J., Williams, K.D.: Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Pers. Social Psychol. 65, 681–706 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. Kelley, T., Littman, J.: The Ten Faces of Innovation: IDEO’s Strategies for Beating the Devil’s Advocate & Driving Creativity Throughout your Organisation. Ransom House, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Mauro, R., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Higgins, T., Kruglanski, A.: The perfect mix: regulatory complementarity and the speed-accuracy balance in group performance. Psychol. Sci. 20(6), 681–685 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mikula, G., Schwinger, T.: Intermember relations and reward allocation: theoretical considerations of affects. In: Brandstatter, H., Davis, H., Schuler, H. (eds.) Dynamics of Group Decisions. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA (1978)Google Scholar
  12. Mitchell, C.K.: The effect of break task on performance during a second session of brainstorming. Masters thesis, University of Texas at Arlington (1998)Google Scholar
  13. Mueller, T.: Biomimetrics: design by nature. National Geographic. nationalgeographic.com. Apr 2009Google Scholar
  14. Nemeth, C.J., Ormiston, M.: Creative idea generation: harmony versus stimulation. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 37(3), 524–535 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parnes, S.J., Meadow, A.: Effect of “brainstorming” instructions on creative problem-solving by trained and untrained subjects. J. Educ. Psychol. 50(4), 171–176 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paulus, P.B., Nakui, T., Brown, V.R., Putman, V.L.: Effects of task instructions and brief breaks on brainstorming. Group Dyn.: Theory, Res. Pract. 10(3), 206–219 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paulus, P., Kohn, N., Arditti, L.: Effects of quantity and quality instructions on brainstorming. J. Creative Behav. 45(1), 38–46 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Personnaz, M., Personnaz, B., Goncalo, J.A.: The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: a study in two countries. Eur. J. Social Psychol. 34(4), 365–374 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, C.M., Tindale, R.S., Dugoni, B.L.: Minority and majority influence in freely interacting groups: qualitative vs. quantitative differences. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 35(1), 137–149 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith, C.M., Bushouse, E., Lord, J.: Individual and group performance on insight problems: the effects of experimentally induced fixation. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 13(1), 91–99 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thompson, L.L.: Improving the creativity of organizational work groups. Acad. Manag. Executive 17(1), 96–109 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson, E.R., Thompson, L., Lucas, B.: Embarrassment versus pride and creative idea generation (2016)Google Scholar
  23. Thompson, L.L., Choi, H.S. (eds.): Creativity and innovation in organizational teams. Psychology Press, Routledge (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kellogg School of ManagementNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations