Describing Scholarly Information Resources with a Unified Temporal Map

  • Robert B. Allen
  • Hanna Song
  • Bo Eun Lee
  • Jiyoung Lee
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10075)

Abstract

We consider the use of procedures for providing structured descriptions of information resources such as scholarly works and of their contents. This goes beyond the usual view of metadata as discrete elements. For instance, we consider mapping the structured and interdependent activities in the publication of Ulysses. We discuss some specific representations and discuss the development of structured scholarly guides. Finally, we consider how the activities associated with publication, along with other historical activities, can be positioned on a unified temporal map. Ultimately, there should be a unified framework for the description of individual information resources and collections of information resources across periods and technologies.

Keywords

Archives Metadata Scholarly records Structured continuum Structured scholarly guides Threads 

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, R.B.: Using information visualization to support access of archival records. J. Archival Organ. 3, 37–49 (2005). doi:10.1300/J201v03n01_04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, R.B.: Visualization, Causation, and History. In: iConference (2011). doi:10.1145/1940761.1940835
  3. 3.
    Allen, R.B.: Issues for the Direct Representation of History. In: Morishima, A., Rauber, A., Liew, C.L. (eds.) ICADL 2016. LNCS, vol. 10075, pp. 218–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen, R.B., Chu, YM.: Architectures for complex semantic models. In: IEEE Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing, pp. 254–261 (2105). doi:10.1109/35021BIGCOMP.2015.7072809
  5. 5.
    Anderson, S., Allen, R.B.: Malleable Finding Aids. TPDL, pp. 402–407 (2012). doi:10.1007%2F978-3-642-33290-6_43Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies with Basic Format Ontology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015). http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/Reference
  7. 7.
    DeRose, S.J.: Navigation, access, and control using structured information. Am. Archivist 60, 298–309 (1997). doi:10.17723/aarc.60.3.0777u1361u62tqp6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huntley, R.P., Sawford, T., Martin, M.J., O’Donovan, C.: Understanding how and why the Gene Ontology and its annotations evolve: the GO within UniProt, GigaScience, 3 (2014). doi:10.1186/2047-217X-3-4
  9. 9.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The interdisciplinary Study of coordination. Comput. Surv. 26, 87–119 (1994). doi:10.1145/174666.174668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayer, R., Antunes, G., Caetano, A., Bakhshandeh, M., Rauber, A., Borbinha, J.: Using ontologies to capture the semantics of a (business) process for digital preservation. Int. J. Digital Librar. 15, 129–152 (2015). doi:10.1007/s00799-015-0141-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayer, R., Proell, S., Rauber, A.: On the Applicability of Workflow Management Systems for the Preservation of Business Processes, iPres (2012). http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~mayer/publications/pdf/may_ipres12-workflows.pdf
  12. 12.
    McKemmish, S., Acland, G., Ward, N., Reed, B.: Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: the Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema, Archivaria, (48) (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rico, F.: Scholarly editions and real readers. Variants 5, 1–13 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Robinson, P.: Current Directions in the Making of Digital Editions: Towards Interactive Editions. Ecdotica 4, 176–191 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Action. Cambridge U. Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Upward, F.M.: Structuring the Records Continuum, Part One: Postcustodial Principles and Properties. Archives and Manuscripts 25 (1997). http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/publications/recordscontinuum-fupp1.html
  17. 17.
    Upward, F.M.: Structuring the Records Continuum, Part Two: Structuration Theory and Recordkeeping. Archives and Manuscripts, 25 (1997). http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/research/groups/rcrg/publications/recordscontinuum-fupp2.html
  18. 18.
    Zisman, M.D.: Representation, Specification and Automation of Office Procedures. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania Wharton School of Business, Pennsylvania (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Allen
    • 1
  • Hanna Song
    • 1
  • Bo Eun Lee
    • 1
  • Jiyoung Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Yonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations