Design of an Adhoc Testbed for IoT and WSAN Applications Using Raspberry Pi
With recent advancement in wireless sensor technologies, IoT and WSAN applications have emerged and new algorithms and protocols have been proposed. Many simulations have been conducted to test these new protocols and algorithms. However in order to verify the new protocols and algorithms in real experiments, we designed an adhoc testbed, where we plan to conduct experiments for IoT and WSAN applications. In this paper we describe our testbed and show some results, while investigating the performance of the network for different packet sizes.
KeywordsWireless Sensor Network Mobile Host Smart City Dynamic Source Route Static Scenario
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.C. Felita and M. Suryanegara, “5G Key Technologies: Identifying Innovation Opportunity”, in International Conference QiR (Quality in Research), pp. 235-238, June 2013.Google Scholar
- 2.A. Gohil, H. Modi and S. Patel, “5G Technology of Mobile Communications: A Survey”, International COnference on INtelligent Systems and Signal Processing (ISSP-2013), pp. 288-292, March 2013.Google Scholar
- 3.X.Y. Li, “Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Theory and Applications”, Cambridge University Press, 2008, Hardcover Print.Google Scholar
- 4.S. Pellicer, G. Santa, A.L. Bleda, R. Maestre, A.J. Jara, A. Gomez Skarmeta, ”A Global Perspective of Smart Cities: A Survey”, in Seventh International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS-2013) pp.439,444, 3-5 July 2013. doi: 10.1109/IMIS.2013.79
- 5.L. Atzoria, A. Ierab, G. Morabitoc, “The Internet of Things: A survey”, Computer Networks, Elsevier, Vol. 54, Issue 15, pp. 2787-2805, October 2010.Google Scholar
- 6.RAPIRO, The programmable DIY Robot with Endless Possibilities, http://www.rapiro.com/, Last Accessed on August 2016.
- 7.G. De Marco, M. Ikeda, T. Yang and L. Barolli, “Experimental Performance Evaluation of a Pro-active Ad-hoc Routing Protocol in Outdoor and Indoor Scenarios”, Proc. of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA-2007), pp. 7-14, May 2007.Google Scholar
- 8.L. Barolli,M. Ikeda, G. De Marco, A. Durresi and F. Xhafa, “Performance Analysis of OLSR and BATMAN Protocols Considering Link Quality Parameter”, Proc. of International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA-2009), pp. 307-314, May 2009.Google Scholar
- 9.M. Ikeda, L. Barolli, M. Hiyama, T. Yang, G. De Marco and A. Durresi, “Performance Evaluation of a MANET Testbed for Differenet Topologies,” Proc. of International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems (NBiS-2009), Indianapolis, pp. 327-334, August 2009Google Scholar
- 10.E. Kulla, M. Ikeda, L. Barolli and R. Miho, “Impact of Source and Destination Movement on MANET Performance Considering BATMAN and AODV Protocols“, Proc. of International Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA-2010), pp. 94-101, 2010.Google Scholar
- 11.Open Mesh Webpage for a Collection of Tools to Build Free and Open Mesh Networks, Available online at http://www.open-mesh.org/
- 12.J. Bicket, D. Aguayo, S. Biswas, and R. Morris, “Architecture and Evaluation of an Unplanned 802.11b Mesh Network”, Proc. of International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM-2005), pp. 31-42 2005.Google Scholar
- 13.D. A. Maltz, J. Broch, and D. B. Johnson, “Lessons from a Full-scale Multihop Wireless Ad-Hoc Network Testbed”, Journal on Personal Communications, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 8-15, February 2001.Google Scholar
- 14.C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das, “Ad-hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, RFC 3561 (Experimental), Jul. 2003.Google Scholar
- 15.D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, and J. Broch, “DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Multi-Hop Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks”, Journal on Ad-Hoc Networking, Chap. 5, pp. 139-172, 2001.Google Scholar
- 16.S. Hou, M. Wu, W. Liao and D. Wang, “Performance Comparison of AODV and DSR in MANET Test-Bed Based on Internet of Things”, IEEE 82nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Fall), pp. 1-5, Boston, MA, 2015. doi: 10.1109/VTCFall.2015.7391074
- 17.P. Bellavista, G. Cardone, A. Corradi and L. Foschini, “Convergence ofMANET andWSN in IoT Urban Scenarios” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 3558-3567, October 2013. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2272099
- 18.Buffalo Products, WLI-UC-GNM: AirStation N-Technology 150Mbps USB 2.0 Client, http://www.buffalo-technology.com/, Last Accessed on February 2015.
- 19.Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS (Trusty Tahr), http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04/, Last Accessed on February 2015.
- 20.Raspbian Jessie Operating System for Raspberry Pi, https://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads/raspbian/, Last Accessed on August 2016.
- 21.A. Dainotti, A. Botta, and A. Pescap, “Do you know what you are generating?” Proc. of International Conference on Emerging Networking Experiments and Technologies (CoNEXT-2007), New York, USA, pp. 1-2, 2007.Google Scholar