Exploring IoT User Dimensions

A Multi-case Study on User Interactions in ‘Internet of Things’ Systems
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10027)

Abstract

‘Internet of Things’ (IoT) systems are fundamentally changing the way in which users interact and perceive technology. In this paper, we focus on two of the numerous dimensions of IoT systems with which the users interact; (1) the IoT user interface and (2) the IoT ecosystem. Based on literature, we develop a model that identifies how data is presented to users and how users interact with the system, and the level at which systems interconnect with, and collects data from, multiple systems. Companies can use the model to assess their systems in order to identify the current state of their systems and to identify the desired state. Moreover, the model can be used to better understand the steps necessary for transforming from one dimension to another in order to develop more advanced IoT systems.

Keywords

Internet of Things User interface Ecosystem User value 

References

  1. 1.
    Fenn, J., Raskino, M.: Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gartner’s 2015 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies Identifies the Computing Innovations That Organizations Should Monitor. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3114217
  3. 3.
    Heather Levy: What’s New in Gartner’s Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies (2015). http://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/whats-new-in-gartners-hype-cycle-for-emerging-technologies-2015/
  4. 4.
    Yonezawa, T., Galache, J.A., Gurgen, L., Matranga, I., Maeomichi, H., Shibuya, T.: A citizen-centric approach towards global-scale smart city platform. In: 2015 International Conference on Recent Advances in Internet of Things (RIoT), pp. 1–6 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Silva, L.C., Morikawa, C., Petra, I.M.: State of the art of smart homes. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 25, 1313–1321 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kovatcheva, E., Nikolov, R., Madjarova, M., Chikalanov, A.: Internet of Things for wellbeing – pilot case of a smart health cardio belt. In: Roa Romero, L.M. (ed.) XIII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2013, pp. 1221–1224. Springer, Switzerland (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., Chlamtac, I.: Internet of Things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 10, 1497–1516 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, G., Huang, J., Cheng, B., Chen, J.: A social network based approach for IoT device management and service composition. In: 2015 IEEE World Congress on Services (SERVICES), pp. 1–8 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Kranz, M., Holleis, P., Schmidt, A.: Embedded interaction: interacting with the Internet of Things. IEEE Internet Comput. 14, 46–53 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rukzio, E., Leichtenstern, K., Callaghan, V., Holleis, P., Schmidt, A., Chin, J.: An experimental comparison of physical mobile interaction techniques: touching, pointing and scanning. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 87–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). doi:10.1007/11853565_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rowland, C., Goodman, E., Charlier, M., Light, A., Lui, A.: Designing Connected Products: UX for the Consumer Internet of Things. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gärdenfors, D.: All or nothing? Interfaces for the Internet of Things — The Conference. https://medium.com/the-conference/all-or-nothing-interfaces-for-the-internet-of-things-15b64bd04ae3#.k2iduusp3
  15. 15.
    Yau, S.S., Buduru, A.B.: Intelligent planning for developing mobile IoT applications using cloud systems. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Services (MS), pp. 55–62 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Evans, D.: The internet of things: how the next evolution of the internet is changing everything. CISCO White Pap. 1, 14 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Nyström, A.-G.: Living labs as open-innovation networks. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hunter, J.: The Hierarchy of IoT “Thing” Needs. http://social.techcrunch.com/2015/09/05/the-hierarchy-of-iot-thing-needs/
  19. 19.
    Liu, Y., Zhou, G.: Key technologies and applications of Internet of Things. In: 2012 Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA), pp. 197–200 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dubé, L., Paré, G.: Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Q. 27, 597–636 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., Mead, M.: The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Q. 11, 369–386 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14, 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kvale, S.: Doing Interviews. SAGE, Los Angeles (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 14, 131–164 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaplan, B., Duchon, D.: Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in information systems research: a case study. MIS Q., 571–586 (1988)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Goetz, J.P., LeCompte, M.D., et al.: Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Academic Press, Orlando (1984)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sarkar, C., Nambi, S.N., Prasad, R.V., Rahim, A.: A scalable distributed architecture towards unifying IoT applications. In: 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 508–513. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceMalmö UniversityMalmöSweden
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations