Advertisement

How to Perform a High-Yield Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

  • Thiruvengadam Muniraj
  • Douglas G. AdlerEmail author
Chapter
  • 752 Downloads

Abstract

Performing a high-quality Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) requires competence in the procedure to ensure the appropriate identification of normal and abnormal findings, and performing diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers as indicated. This chapter will review the technique of upper endoscopy focusing on how to perform an efficient and complete examination with discussion of key normal and pathologic findings. With recent paradigm shift toward value-based care emphasizing quality more than quantity, along with payment and policy changes mandating the endoscopists to meet and report quality metrics, we believe this chapter on how to perform a high-yield upper endoscopic examination will be very useful for all the endoscopists.

Keywords

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) Ulcer Biopsy Esophagus Stomach Duodenum Quality Competence 

Supplementary material

Video 1.1

Examples of two brief esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures (MP4 179273 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1004–17.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Preiss C, Charton JP, Schumacher B, Neuhaus H. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD. Endoscopy. 2003;35:641–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Hidaka N, Ichise Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N. Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study. Dig Endosc Off J Jpn Gastroenterol Endosc Soc. 2009;21:24–8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1127–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung CS, Lin CK, Liang CC, Hsu WF, Lee TH. Intentional examination of esophagus by narrow-band imaging endoscopy increases detection rate of cervical inlet patch. Dis Esophagus Off J Int Soc Dis Esophagus/ISDE. 2015;28:666–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dellon ES, Gonsalves N, Hirano I, Furuta GT, Liacouras CA, Katzka DA. ACG clinical guideline: Evidenced based approach to the diagnosis and management of esophageal eosinophilia and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:679–92 quiz 93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shaheen NJ, Falk GW, Iyer PG, Gerson LB. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:30–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levine DS, Blount PL, Rudolph RE, Reid BJ. Safety of a systematic endoscopic biopsy protocol in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1152–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cameron GR, Jayasekera CS, Williams R, Macrae FA, Desmond PV, Taylor AC. Detection and staging of esophageal cancers within Barrett’s esophagus is improved by assessment in specialized Barrett’s units. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:971–83 e1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Prachayakul V, Aswakul P, Leelakusolvong S. Massive gastric antral vascular ectasia successfully treated by endoscopic band ligation as the initial therapy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;5:135–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang YX, Brill J, Krishnan P, Leontiadis G. American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the role of upper gastrointestinal biopsy to evaluate dyspepsia in the adult patient in the absence of visible mucosal lesions. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1082–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American gastroenterological association institute guideline on the role of upper gastrointestinal biopsy to evaluate dyspepsia in the adult patient in the absence of visible mucosal lesions: clinical decision support tool. Gastroenterology. 2015;149:1119.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney system. international workshop on the histopathology of gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20:1161–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Banerjee S, Cash BD, Dominitz JA, et al. The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with peptic ulcer disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:663–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–76 quiz 77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators common to all GI endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:3–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:17–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Huntsman Cancer CenterUniversity of Utah School of MedicineSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations