ACRyLIQ: Leveraging DBpedia for Adaptive Crowdsourcing in Linked Data Quality Assessment

  • Umair ul Hassan
  • Amrapali Zaveri
  • Edgard Marx
  • Edward Curry
  • Jens Lehmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10024)

Abstract

Crowdsourcing has emerged as a powerful paradigm for quality assessment and improvement of Linked Data. A major challenge of employing crowdsourcing, for quality assessment in Linked Data, is the cold-start problem: how to estimate the reliability of crowd workers and assign the most reliable workers to tasks? We address this challenge by proposing a novel approach for generating test questions from DBpedia based on the topics associated with quality assessment tasks. These test questions are used to estimate the reliability of the new workers. Subsequently, the tasks are dynamically assigned to reliable workers to help improve the accuracy of collected responses. Our proposed approach, ACRyLIQ, is evaluated using workers hired from Amazon Mechanical Turk, on two real-world Linked Data datasets. We validate the proposed approach in terms of accuracy and compare it against the baseline approach of reliability estimate using gold-standard task. The results demonstrate that our proposed approach achieves high accuracy without using gold-standard task.

References

  1. 1.
    Acosta, M., Zaveri, A., Simperl, E., Kontokostas, D., Auer, S., Lehmann, J.: Crowdsourcing linked data quality assessment. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8219, pp. 260–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Difallah, D.E., Demartini, G., Cudrè-Mauroux, P.: Pick-a-crowd: tell me what you like, and i’ll tell you what to do. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 367–374 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan, J., et al.: iCrowd: an adaptive crowdsourcing framework. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 1015–1030. ACM (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghazvinian, A., Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A., et al.: Creating mappings for ontologies in biomedicine: simple methods work. In: AMIA (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ul Hassan, U., O’Riain, S., Curry, E.: Effects of expertise assessment on the quality of task routing in human computation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Social Media for Crowdsourcing and Human Computation, Paris, France (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ul Hassan, U., O’Riain, S., Curry, E.: Leveraging matching dependencies for guided user feedback in linked data applications. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Information Integration on the Web, pp. 1–6. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked Data: Evolving the Web Into a Global Data Space, vol. 1. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ho, C.-J., Jabbari, S., Vaughan, J.W.: Adaptive task assignment for crowdsourced classification. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-13), pp. 534–542 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14(6), 1–4 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ipeirotis, P.G.: Analyzing the amazon mechanical turk marketplace. XRDS: Crossroads ACM Mag. Students 17(2), 16–21 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ipeirotis, P.G., Provost, F., Wang, J.: Quality management on amazon mechanical turk. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, pp. 64–67. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lehmann, J., et al.: DBpedia - a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from wikipedia. Semant. Web J. 6(2), 167–195 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C., Auer, S.: LIMES - a time-efficient approach for large-scale link discovery on the web of data. In: Proceedings of IJCAI (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noy, N.F., et al.: Mechanical turk as an ontology engineer?: using microtasks as a component of an ontology-engineering workflow. In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 262–271 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oleson, D., et al.: Programmatic gold: targeted and scalable quality assurance in crowdsourcing. In: Human Computation 11.11 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sarasua, C., Simperl, E., Noy, N.F.: CrowdMap: crowdsourcing ontology alignment with microtasks. In: Cudré-Mauroux, P., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7649, pp. 525–541. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_33 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 5(1), 3–55 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tarasov, A., Delany, S.J., Namee, B.M.: Dynamic estimation of worker reliability in crowdsourcing for regression tasks: making it work. In: Expert Systems with Applications 41.14, pp. 6190–6210 (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winkler, W.: String comparator metrics and enhanced decision rules in the Fellegi-Sunter model of record linkage. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (American Statistical Association), pp. 354–359 (1990)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zaveri, A., et al.: Quality assessment for linked data: a survey. Semant. Web J. 7(1), 63–93 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zaveri, A., et al.: User-driven quality evaluation of DBpedia. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems, pp. 97–104. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhou, Y., Chen, X., Li, J.: Optimal PAC multiple arm identification with applications to crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), pp. 217–225 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Umair ul Hassan
    • 1
  • Amrapali Zaveri
    • 2
  • Edgard Marx
    • 3
  • Edward Curry
    • 1
  • Jens Lehmann
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Insight Centre for Data AnalyticsNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics ResearchStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.AKSW GroupUniversity of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Computer Science InstituteUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  5. 5.Knowledge Discovery DepartmentFraunhofer IAISSankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations